>>81689820>spatial iq is when reflexes>there aren't different kinds (i.e. subsets) of IQ anon>>81688862>neural plasticity is independent from iq>>81688470>arbitrary score on a bell curve>IQ tests are not accurate at measuring intelligenceiq correlates strongly with virtually all measures of success and cognitive deficit we have (i.e. an actual diagnostic tool), societal or otherwise, to the point where i argue not accepting it as a proxy measurement if not a measurement naturally precludes you from making any comparative statements re: intelligence.
>>81688442>phd implies intelligencephd implies conscientiousness, which is related to, but not exactly, intelligence.
>>81688448>you can't get a phd in math with a 108 iqyou probably could.
>t. matsci phdthis thread sucks bc you all simply don't understand what you're discussing. IQ Is a comparative measure of how efficient your brain is at performing certain elementary cognitive tasks that extrapolate well to real-life performance. the strength of your short-term memory, your ability to manipulate simple objects or to recognize patterns, how much verbal knowledge and intuition you've built already, etc. are all the foundation of the complete human portrait of intelligence.