>>81711085>We wouldn't even need welfare if we lived in a society that didn't prioritize capitalism,>implyingmonopiles and usury aren't free market idiot
anyway, what would happen if I didn't want to pay my share for single mothers, annonete?
>and fathersno, those actually tend to have jobs, probably why their kids don't turn out to be criminals most of the time
>custodyim not moving the goal post, but i genuinely don't care about this aspect of the settlements
divorce rape happens to men more because we can't afford to be leaches at the tit of the state like women are.
>That doesn't mean that it's okayyeah. ok? Im not a shit skin but with the way women vote they seem to be eager to bring islam and backwater savages here.
>but it is crazy to me how the man does not get as much shame for cheating as the woman does.i think anyone that breaks up their marriage for random dick/pussy gets a bad rap. You trying to quantify the defamation within decimals screams power hungry.
If I said "joke about divorce" the first thing that pops up in your mind isn't some woman on the street with a child, but an alcoholic guy and cucking. Well, you are a female and we already established you just want even more "equality" so don't bother answering that actually.
>Even in real life when a guy brags about having sex with a girl, people support him.well women can do this too now so at least the whoring out is truly equal. Now we just have to make the virginity rates equal too....oh wait.
>I know.do you?
implying that among all these anti-war propaganda pieces that reach MSM levels of notoriety, you have NEVER seen something condemning war time rape is absolutely ludicrous , and you are a woman too so you think this stuff would be your go to against "le evil nature of men".
This is just plain ignorant, which isn't a shocker considering your other viewpoints
>That's not quite bright of you either.ill reiterate, what would happen to me if i didn't want to contribute to welfare?