>>81718829 (OP)for example
"terrifs are bad because it will just be passed to the consuumer"
ok
taxing the rich does the same thing
why would a country or a company take the tax hit when it can be passed to the consumer
>>81718843when it comes to economic policy, there is not anything more than the economy. If you are talking about the meaning of life or some equally esoteric stuff, then please know that that stuff can only be pursued in peace and prosperity. If you want to meditate, thats free. If you want to have friends and worship, thats free. But money and the mateerial side of the world should be set up for the maximum production of goods and value for everyone
and the only intolerant one here is you
>>81718857heres a book for you to read
"Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis"
>>81718856No I don't. Next time you should ask what I believe before assuming what I believe in bad faith. Thats how a conversation works