>Average man is attracted to 50% of women
>Average woman is only attracted to 5% of men
Make it make sense

They are all lesbians

>>81735922 (OP)
im ngl its not that hard to be part of the 5% in dating apps just know how to take pictures and dont present yourself as a manchild or "inoffensive" issue is making women think youre attractive irl

>>81735963
Looksmaxxing exists.

>>81735922 (OP)
>Make it make sense
That's the fun part, I can't!
Proximity and time spent together is how normal relationships develop, this allows for a lot of guys to find partners, moving over to the digital where you're just stats on her phone means she will choose what she believes is best every single time, she will come to expect nothing less in fact, the average man who could have had a chance if they interacted in real life no longer stands a chance.
We really fucked ourselves with the internet, maybe future generations can do better.

>>81735963
Would you shut the fuck up, top 5% are tall guys with handsome faces, you don't know what you're talking about.

You will never be good enough for the average woman. Take the blackpill and live a happy life as a truecel.

>>81736023
>tall guys
>on tinder
are you retarded?

>do women actually just like the illusion of self sufficiency?

>>81735963
>just know how to take pictures and dont present yourself as a manchild or "inoffensive"
i've seen women say shit like this and then swipe on chads who only have blurry bathroom selfies and an otherwise-blank profile

Use to be the 20/80 rule, now I guess it's the 5/95 rule

>>81735922 (OP)
>dating app data
Wow, it's worthless!

>>81736475
This. Our dads are part of the top 5% of society and we have their genes.

>>81736023
why does being tall matters on photos you fucking retard

>>81736540
>he thinks anyone is looking at photos

>>81736297
By learning to take photos I mean making yourself look attractive in them. No one is attractive 24/7 and most people can look very different on photos depending on the angle/lightning. At minimum you shouldn't be having photos in your profile that make you look less attractive. Women are pretty much professionals at taking photos while most men are borderline retarded at taking them which is why I think its not that hard to be part of the 95%. Honestly even chad can end up falling victim for this you can be pretty and not photogenic.

>>81736618
yeah this
its like that one retard that swiped right like 2 million times but only had those straight guy holding fish smiling awkwardly pics lol

>>81735922 (OP)
I figured this out in middle school, op.

Men can reproduce 100x faster and don't risk their lives every time they do it.

>>81736661
as this >>81735969 anon pointed looksmaxxing also helps a lot in your pictures. Tats, muscles and a good haircut/beard boosts your smv by a shit ton on dating apps. Honestly you can get away with being ugly in dating apps if you look "sexy" enough in the female gaze. This phenomena is also true if youre a woman with a mid face but look like a fertility goddess

>>81736897
tats and getting a good haircut/beard boost your sex appeal pretty much instantly for women

It makes sense because biologically men don't participate in raising their spawn (in humans).
There are species where both partners contribute equally, those species usually have somewhat bigger females in proportion to whatever they gestate, and have little sexual dimorphism and selection. One common example is hooded crows, even specialists often struggle to differentiate between males and females, their eggs are small and low risk for the female and contributing to raising (aka feeding, nesting and teaching) is equal.
But in homo sapiens female bears like 80% of responsibility and risk for having an offspring, so they are super selective over who is worth such risk.

There are also other factors for low sexual dimorphism and selection in animals, but they simply don't apply to humans. Those can be :
- A very solitary and isolated lifestyle, for example a lots of felines.
-Females selecting for traits that are shared in same chromosome, so inherited in both sexes (some birds)

>>81735922 (OP)
women are conditioned to care about their appearance since they're girls. Men on the other hand are valued by other things like money, physical skill, etc.

On dating apps you see pictures first. In real life women value a man's conversational ability more. If you can make people laugh you can flip that statistic and get pretty much 95% of women you go for.
On dating apps you're never even given that chance because both women and men have to judge by appearance.

>>81736540
Tinder has a height filter.

>>81737227
This is such extreme bluepilled cope. 95% is the most delusional number I've ever seen.

>>81736540
Not him but most guys on tinder(Tall guys) have their height as the first thing on their bio for a reason

>>81735922 (OP)
Men are shit, they don't know what hygiene is, apparently a lot of them don't know you are supposed to clean your ass and to use the soap on your whole body

Why is this a bad thing? Most people have no place reproducing. If Chad passes on his genes then so fucking what. Why should I care?

>>81737240
Even Duolicious has a height filter. The last resort for the most pathetic losers has a fucking height filter.

>>81735922 (OP)
Moids blow and deserve to be lonely.
Note that foids also spend more time with each other having fun and try to constantly erect foid-only spaces to keep moids out but moids never try to have moid-only spaces.
No one likes moids; they suck and are terrible company and deserve their loneliness.

They have no value and no worth except for manual labor and dying in wars.

>>81735922 (OP)
well u guys r ugly

>>81739125
>but moids never try to have moid-only spaces
what were video games?

>>81739430
They never wanted girls out and would rejoice if a girl would join the server.
Male-only spaces exist because foids don't want to get into them. Female-only spaces exist because foids kick moids out who try to get into them.

Foids are desired, both both by their own and by moids. Moids are hated by everyone including by moids. They even kill each other more than they kill foids. That is how much they have no value and are a failed creation.

>>81739125
roasties will say shit like this and fool themselves for a moment but if you get to know them you'll understand that they need male companionship more than men need their bodies.
They'll talk about sisterhood and independence but they'll cry themselves to sleep every time they see a happy stacy.
Eventually men will be happy with sexbots but non-stacies will never fill that hole.

>>81739500
this men live on easy mode and women are suffering much more than any man.

>>81735922 (OP)
Imagine if you were talking to a girl who has very mid looks and she was like
>PLEASE! ILL LITERALLY FUCK ANY GUY, IT DOESNT EVEN MATTER IF ITS A FUCKING OLD FAT BLACK GUY, ANY DICK PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE
You probably wouldn't find her very appealing. That's how most guys look and act, and that's why they will swipe on everyone on tinder instead of selecting. Have you seen a guy use tinder? Most of my friends would literally just watch a youtube video or something while swiping right over and over without looking. If there were girls who act like men, you would have to be cautious about giving likes on the app.

>>81739513
yeah and it's all self-inflicted. It's my only comfort as a short framecel.

>>81739532
>born with the wrong genetics
>"self inflicted"
patriarchy pilled

>>81739539
I meant women's suffering!

>>81735963
It's not hard to be in the top 20% for dating apps. It's a little difficult to be in the top 5%.
It's also a lot harder to get hookups instead of just dates. Girls who want hookups only care about looks. Being a top 5% for hookups is pure luck of the genetic draw.
Girls who want actual dates will care about your job, salary, personality, etc. You can partially make up for having not being the most attractive guy.

>>81735922 (OP)
Fuck apps and social media ruined everything.
They made women Chad-sexual, and average men incels.

>>81735922 (OP)
Women don't like men like that, take the misandrypill.

>>81739125
>Note that foids also spend more time with each other having fun and try to constantly erect foid-only spaces to keep moids out but moids never try to have moid-only spaces.

Is this why feminists caused the Boy Scouts of America to get renamed to Scouts of America, while maintaining a ban on boys from joining the Girl Scouts of America?
Kill yourself.

>They have no value and no worth except for manual labor and dying in wars.
If I am reduced to my traditional roles, women should be reduced to their traditional roles, otherwise your pretense for feminism and equality no longer stands.

>>81737690
It ain't Chad reproducing, its shit tier criminals and drug addicts having kids. We are devolving

>>81737227
Men are judged by what they do when they can hold a woman economically hostage. Otherwise a woman wants a man that is the top 10% or higher in looks. She will settle for betabux but will resent him and make his life hell and then clean him out.

>>81736171
I was tall on tinder and got 0 matches. Then went to other apps and got decent matches and conversations.
Not coming to say height doesn't matter, just tinder is utter shit for almost all.

>>81739125
Not allowed to have man only spaces otherwise they'd be discriminatory with an activist woman trying to take it down.

You literally have Crystal Cafe, yet you still find yourself here. Women can't help themselves but to invade male spaces.

That's not true. You are simply misinterpreting the chart and using mental gymnastics to come to the conclusion you wanted. It has never been easier than today to find girls. Incels are only making excuses for not trying.

>>81737093
>It makes sense because biologically men don't participate in raising their spawn
What the fuck are you talking about?
I won't read the rest of your inane babbling, I hope this entire post was made with AI, that you aren't a mouth breathing retard that actually believes this is true.

>>81737274
The reason being they are insecure and think being tall will compensate for their shortcomings.

>>81735922 (OP)
as someone who tried a bunch of dating apps, the ones where I've been most likely to get actual 30+ message conversations out of girls are:
Jaumo > Boo > Duolicious > OKcupid > Bumble > Lovoo > Tinder > Hinge
Jaumo is some chink app I think, It has the advantage that you get a bunch of coins per day for free, and with those you can message people without matching them.
Your intro requests will still get rejected a lot obviously, but at least you got a bunch of real females actually looking at your profile.
Boo and Duolicious have simmilar features.
On duolicious its fully free, but 1) its the retard 4chan dating app and most girls on there are batshit insane, and due to the fact that messaging people is free, women get so many goddamn intros that they ignore even more messages percentage wise or are really passive dry texters because they are chatting with 30 guys simultaniously.
Boo is some reddit tier "introvert" dating app, so if you're a robot there will be more girls on there that e.g. play vidya, watch anime, etc. Most of them are still pretty normie, but its a better target audience than stacy's on tinder so you get more matches as an introvert robot type.
OKcupid kinda sucks, but you get spammed by a bunch of 3rd world bitches that want your big fat... passport if you live in a first world country. That can boost your ego.
Bumble, Lovoo, and Tinder are kinda on the same level, probably just luck of the draw really that I got more matches on one or the other.
Hinge is dogshit. Maybe its the opposite of "Boo" and its the target audience thats the furthest (soon to hit the wall normie beckys that are looking to settle down with a normie chad-lite), but during the 2 month of my dating app experiment, I didn't get a single fucking match.
The best result was on Jaumo where in 2 month I've had over two dozen conversation with real non scam girls that didn't just fizzle out in the first 3 messages and actually lasted at least 30+ messages exchanged.

>>81743046
>but at least you got a bunch of real females actually looking at your profile.
forgot to mention:
shit like Tinder or Bumble have an elo system.
If the algorithm decides your profile is shit, you're effectively shaddowbanned. You aren't just getting any matches because your profile is shit, and you are metaphorically invisible to women because you aren't a chad.
You're not getting any matches because you literally don't even appear in femoids swipe-stack anymore and are literally invisible to them.
Though deleting and making a new account can mitigate that somewhat, it still sucks dick.

So features like the messaging thing that get actual real female eyes on your profile are real fucking nice, after that its just a numbers game until one of them accepts your request.

>>81742858
>Muh muh muh feminism, if you dislike me, that means you must be a feminist.
No anon, it wasn't "feminists" who renamed that dumb scouting; they simply had allowed females for a long time which is the point. Moids aren't trying to create male-only spaces because they all rejoice when foids enter. Also, I don't live in that shit country and scouting was never secregated to begin with where I live.

Feminism blows and the reason you're reduced to your traditional roles is other moids anyway and because you're not good for anything else.

>>81742903
>Muh muh 4chan is a male-only space
No, there's literally no mention in the rules anywhere of it; that's the point. You actually think they're going to go after you if you make some forum that doesn't allow female posters? Of course not, it's just that none of you people would even want it because the moment some foid shows up anywhere in your male only spaces you rejoice and stumble over each other to get the drips of attention from that person.

>>81736487
threadus /us

>>81743087
That's a lot of words to cope with.

>>81735922 (OP)
>Make it make sense
Possibly the gayest meme phrase to come out in recent history. Whenever I read it I immediately associate it with quirk chungus reddit females.

>>81739446
>>81743087
>men rejoice 100% of the time when a woman invades their male only space
That's merely your mere opinion

Most men are emotionally stunted crugs, even with resources or looks. Women can tolerate the dullness if he's established, but there's no point in someone who's both a flat dullard and has nothing going on.