With 95% of men not being able to find a mate, how long until unironic incel revolution happens and loss of all female rights? We came to the point where even objectively handsome men are simply unable to find a date. With females now whoring themselves to the only top 5% men, it's more than evident that giving females right to choose a partner leads to civilizational collapse. I propose a strictest form of sharia for females. No ability to leave the home, no ability to hold a job and no ability to choose a partner. It's the only way to stop female animalistic ultra hypergamy from ruining the world.

>>81742828 (OP)
it's cliche, but have you tried going outside

>>81742838
Are you a female? How does it feel knowing you will lose all rights including the right to use internet in 10 years tops?

>>81742828 (OP)
I prefer a positive incentive system where people are rewarded for marrying and having kids

>revolution
yes, that's a risk factor
>incel revolution specifically
doubt, you need another organizing principle, it'll be for this or that ideology but fueled largely by frustrated and lonely men

>>81742838
Yeah and its 100% true
Ugly or average men dont have any chances

>>81743012
But women choose not to do that when they have the option to. The only way they will behave like decent people is if they're forced to.

>>81743012
yes but only if you're white or asian
certain populations are already breeding enough with abortion as the only levy keeping them from flooding in

>>81743034
Things are too comfortable for an incel revolution, but if it ever happened it'd be mega based.

Women are horrible because our ancestors behaved badly towards them. We'll have to wait 100,000 years in a feminist society before hypergamy disappears from the brains of all women. Sequestering women is not a long-term strategy, but if we don't care about other generations like the boomers did, we'll have to ban all rights to women.

>>81743118
Boomers were smart about this shit. When you let woman out of their chains, they're 100% focused on evolution. Only the strongest and tallest guys will be suitable. Technically, it's good for humanity, as manlet losers can't rape women anymore and force them to have low genetics babies.

>>81743012
But that would mean putting in more regulations that might make green line not go up and that would make shareholders unhappy, you know like mandated leave, mandated schedule flexibility, protecting consumers from investment banks snatching up all the land and pricing young families out of the market and people spending money and time helping their children raise their grandchildren means less money being spent making the green line go up. Green line go up is all that matters.

>>81743172
We don't care about the proper evolution of women because we've never needed them. Women now don't need them either, but their brains don't realize it - it's just a matter of waiting a long, long time before they understand that this strategy is useless now.

>>81742828 (OP)
Women want to be attracted

>>81742828 (OP)
We will be replaced by (((AI))) shortly. Simps are no longer needed to enforce the Jew World Order.

>>81743083
Kek it's another "pale men good, dark men bad" thread.
Also this isn't true. I can't find a fucking gf anymore whether she's my race or not because they're all hypersexual whores now

>>81742828 (OP)
It cannot happen soon enough, mein bruder.

>>81742828 (OP)

there is definitely a cultural incel revolution already going on in Gen Z and Gen Alpha especially, however, as for a hard uprising, I don't think that's likely given modern bread and circuses like pornography, vidya, and drugs. i think it will be a slow collapse unfortunately where men just check out and society collapses - hopefully before the AI roll-out completely replaces men which would nullify them checking out.

>>81744467
Agreed. Sadly, this incel revolution will mostly consist of men dropping out of society. With AI and outsourcing to slaves, it won't even matter.