Thread 81765400

What you feel for women is just a desire to procreate, not love. You don't know what it's like to feel a deep connection to someone and fall in love without expecting a family because they're all you need in life. You will never know true love as a straight man and I pity you lol.

no listen man im gonna say some gooey shit about like a soul or something and uhhh it's just real ok man

weird flex but ok enjoy your cope

>>81765400 (OP)

There's no such thing as love for either gender but it sure is nice to pretend that we really like each other for our personalities and shit.

>>81765400 (OP)
>What you feel for women is just a desire to procreate, not love.
I'm still undecided on having kids but I definitely want a gf/wife, so you're wrong

>>81765400 (OP)
what you call a desire to procreate is not a desire to procreate, it's actually motivation to experience life.

>>81765428
I can only develop feelings for personalities I like without even knowing how they look like behind the screen

>>81765454
>creating more life is how you experience life instead of focusing on your own and existing life

>>81765400 (OP)
>stupid femcel can't comprehend that sex is like physiological need for men and being horny feels like needing to pee, with intrusive thoughts flooding your brain until you cum, and actual love with cuddling goes after you cum in girl
Give sex and yummy meals, obtain love, it's that easy.

>>81765400 (OP)
>You don't know what it's like to feel a deep connection to someone and fall in love without expecting a family because they're all you need in life
I know exactly what that is, I've experienced it with several women (and even a man) online. True love transcends gender and even physical attraction. But it never lasts long. Love is like a beautiful flower destined to wither away and die. A fleeting connection between two souls.

>>81765400 (OP)
>You will never know true love as a straight man
So no one will never true love then

>>81765400 (OP)
You don't understand that your concept of romantic love has been poisoned by your belief it's detached from sex, a common phenomenon in women.
What you often desire and describe isn't a lover's love, it's daddy's love you missed, and that now you seek in your romantic relationship, never growing up into a woman seeking a sexual relationship.

>>81765472
i'm just saying a biological fact. nobody desires anyone else. that's just an illusion.

>>81765400 (OP)
Women aren't capable of true love. They view men as toys, not as people, and they have no loyalty to men or to each other. Homosexuals are effeminate mentally ill, thus not capable of true love either. The only true form of love is male friendship.
TL;DR Homies over hoes!

>>81765816
male friendship doesn't exist. men only talk to each other for money.

>>81765483
That isn't love, nor is it deep. It's just a shallow fondness for something. You get bored of it, then throw it away.

>>81765831
Some people like you are incapable of feeling deep emotions, only shallow ones. You just wouldn't understand.

>>81765824
That's terrible bait

>>81765870
it has nothing to do with bait.

>>81765865
I throw that insult right back at you. Deep feelings are lasting. They last years, decades, or even an entire lifetime. They are like a possession that takes over one's body and moves them to fulfill the desires of said feeling.

>>81765887
>it has nothing to do with bait.
You're stupid or lying. Which is it?

>>81765865
Throwing the relationship away when it gets boring or hard is a sign of a true deep thinker. I understand now!

>>81765400 (OP)
>He thinks gays or lesbians experience love more than straggots
I pity you. Are you new ?

>>81765891
not really, no.
unconditional love and love that you develop over a long period of time will last a lifetime, yes, but it won't necessarily be a deep experience of love. human emotions ebb and flow, and once you get used to a relationship or experience your emotions stabilize. that other gay anon set himself up for failure by assuming (fresh) love needs to die quickly with each new person, but deep emotions follow deeply stimulating or engaging experiences, its not the same as the vague motivating force that makes you "owe" something to yourself or anyone else after the experience or in anticipation of it.

Once you have a good social circle, a committed partner, and children, yes you can feel a deep sense of belonging, support, love, etc. nearly all the time, but that still requires extraordinary care and balance to maintain. people who feel deep positive emotions also experience deep negative ones.

>>81765964
Is this how people talk when they find out they have an IQ of 120 and get all gassed up about it?

>>81765506
Humans outside of straight men exist
>>81765737
Then why do women that do t want kids exist?

>>81765400 (OP)
This bait written by a seething faggot. Sorry your deviant lifestyle will never produce life and heirs. Little ones like yourself. You will never know this. You will die with a bleeding asshole and an empty home.

You are a dumbass and make no sense
I had a gf before

>>81765964
>deep emotions follow deeply stimulating or engaging experiences, its not the same as the vague motivating force that makes you "owe" something to yourself or anyone else after the experience or in anticipation of it.
But for one to seek out said experiences, there must be a motivating force. Sure, those experiences evoke love, but they are also driven to happen by love.

>>81765483
>>81765865
You made a rule for yourself that validates you over nothing. You've convinced yourself that no matter what, feeling deep emotions makes you more "human" than other people. You created this arbitrary rule where you always win no matter what.

How is feeling deep emotions inherently productive? How is it inherently intellectual? How is it inherently a net positive?

You created this graph for yourself that exponentially goes up for no reason. Deep emotion = good. Me feel deep emotion. Me = good

It comes from nowhere. You're patting yourself on the back and putting yourself above orhers for no fucking reason.

Fuck you

>>81766096
Nta but you could argue feeling deeper emotions are productive and intellectual because by nature they engage more than just your instincts, and so should give you a deeper bond with people or at least a better understanding. Just those are a net positive to me, even if just barely.

>>81765400 (OP)
Hey uh
I'm cheating with your boyfriend
He swallows my nut and won't be back till later
I'll hyu when it's time to drop him off and clean him up
He got a tight bussy. Actually I think I will be kewl ng him over at my place
Ttyl!

>>81765428
love isnt an emotion but it does exist

>>81765400 (OP)
I don't really trust someone from 4chan to really understand love or engage with another person on an emotional level, whatever you guys say is emotional tends to just be neurotic and insane

>>81766096
>>81766172
This debate is useless because "deep emotions" is a meaningless buzzword

>>81766172
I understand what you're saying, I can say the same thing about thinking like a logical robot and the net positives of that. We can argue in favor of any types of thought loops. Who cares. They can all be "good".

I just dislike how fucking arrogant the person I was replying to is. He put himself above others for no reason. He thought he was so smart for thinking thoughts that have the potential to be just as intellectual and productive as any sort of other thought.

He thought he was hot shit for thinking. Might as well think you're special for breathing.

>>81766242
Yea wigga that's exactly my point

>>81765400 (OP)
Kids are the ultimate expression of love. Not always of course. Some people pump out kids like they're rats. But there is no greater love than literally combining yourselves to form a new complete person that has the qualities of both.

>>81766004
Why do you think everyone wants that? Is it because you can't comprehend how other people can have desires different from your own, because you're biologically programmed to breed like an animal or both?

>>81766213
That's fair but I'm not like these other 4channers :3

>>81765993
Faggots arent capable of feelings

>>81765400 (OP)
I have known love, and that is how I found out that I am not mentally equipped to handle it like a normal person. Now I'm more about avoiding it so it doesn't happen again.

>>81765400 (OP)
>You will never know true love as a straight man and I pity you lol
Rich coming from a faggot. Oh I forgot how many of you are in so called open relationship btw?

>>81765400 (OP)
I literally want to overdose on opioids while laying my head in her lap as she ruffles my hair and tells me I'm gonna be okay. It's not about procreation.

>>81767319
They are just not all of them. I'd say most humans aren't other than their selfish needs. Only few of us know true love and I doubt you're one of the chosen.
>>81767339
Yes. This is why normalfags are capable of moving on and "falling in love" with countless people throughout their lives. They're also capable of having casual sex which makes me want to puke.