>>81789626 (OP)>weren't career oriented enough for herplease explain to me why foids are this fucking retarded?
MEN. DON'T. GIVE. A. FUCK. ABOUT. YOUR. CAREER.
especially those that are career oriented themselves.
So by being herself successful, and only limiting her dating pool to men who are even more successful than her, she's limiting her dating pool probably down to <5% of men already with just that single criteria.
And we haven't even added all the chad traits yet that again probably limit her dating pool down to <5% of the men still in the race.
Combined with that men would also have to still be single and theoretically willing to commit to marriage, she's probably down to the 0.001% of the male population, and now those have to actually like her back too.
And why the fuck would they?
Even those looking for a LTR / marriage, the handsome successful millionaire chad would much rather date the cute early 20's barista from starbucks that always gives a cheekish smile when he orders his coffee, rather than some 30yo "successful career woman"
They are competing with basically all women for the same guy, when the solution would be so simple
What successful career women need if they actually want to get married isn't an even more successful career guy, its the exact opposite, someone who'd love to be the homemaker and house-husband and stay-at-home-father while she's doing the provider role.
If you want to turn gender-roles on their head, all power to you, you have to go all the way.
You just can't do the "strong independent women who don't need no man" bullshit while at the same time still wanting the female fantasy of having an even stronger and more successful typically male also-provider husband.
If you as a female wanna do the typically male provider role, you ideally need a male who wants to do the typically female homemaker role.