Anonymous
7/12/2025, 8:21:18 AM No.81798274
I realize normies might find it distasteful that we laugh at things like this. Allow me to explain why it is funny.
For roughly 10,000 years, it was extremely well understood that violence is the exclusive dominion of men. The men who carried out authorized acts of violence (warriors and guards) lived lives that were brutal, dangerous, and often short. Because of this, we granted these men high status and good rewards for risking their lives doing violence on our behalf that the rest of us (namely women, children, and elderly people were incapable of doing. Because these men were the ones doling out the violence, they were also 99.9% of the time deciding how and why and to whom violence was dealt out. In short
.Willingness to Risk Violence = Rewards. Then about 100 years ago, a lot of bored women decided that they wanted these rewards and felt dissatisfied that they weren't being given these rewards that were exclusively for males. The problem was that they saw their fathers, husbands, and sons getting these rewards, but didn't see WHY they were getting these rewards. They didn't understand what was being done to earn them. The legal and civil inequality these women were experiencing was a direct downstream product of biological, primordial inequality that they were sheltered from. They began to perceive their legal and civil equality with men as ACTUAL equality with men.
We raised a generation of girls to believe that they could do anything a man could do. So here's the product of all that: a petite gingerbread woman dressed as a cop getting clocked in the face. She isn't crying in pain. She's crying because a century of feminist horseshit that she based her entire identity on was disintegrated by a single punch to the face. A single punch that has revealed instantly why 10,000 years of history looked exactly one way and why this neoliberal order is fucking gay and stupid.
TL;DR Get back in the kitchen
For roughly 10,000 years, it was extremely well understood that violence is the exclusive dominion of men. The men who carried out authorized acts of violence (warriors and guards) lived lives that were brutal, dangerous, and often short. Because of this, we granted these men high status and good rewards for risking their lives doing violence on our behalf that the rest of us (namely women, children, and elderly people were incapable of doing. Because these men were the ones doling out the violence, they were also 99.9% of the time deciding how and why and to whom violence was dealt out. In short
.Willingness to Risk Violence = Rewards. Then about 100 years ago, a lot of bored women decided that they wanted these rewards and felt dissatisfied that they weren't being given these rewards that were exclusively for males. The problem was that they saw their fathers, husbands, and sons getting these rewards, but didn't see WHY they were getting these rewards. They didn't understand what was being done to earn them. The legal and civil inequality these women were experiencing was a direct downstream product of biological, primordial inequality that they were sheltered from. They began to perceive their legal and civil equality with men as ACTUAL equality with men.
We raised a generation of girls to believe that they could do anything a man could do. So here's the product of all that: a petite gingerbread woman dressed as a cop getting clocked in the face. She isn't crying in pain. She's crying because a century of feminist horseshit that she based her entire identity on was disintegrated by a single punch to the face. A single punch that has revealed instantly why 10,000 years of history looked exactly one way and why this neoliberal order is fucking gay and stupid.
TL;DR Get back in the kitchen
Replies:
