how is facial abuse legal again and also has someone messaged their normal boyfriends about what their girlfriends did in the past?

>>81821669 (OP)
>how is facial abuse legal
They sign a contract for it which makes them not liable to any forms of abuse, the real question is why do women keep signing up for it?

>>81821691
>mom son porn has to be called mom and not her son
>petite teen has no search resulsts on pornhub
>genuine rape videos with a contract are ok

>>81821704
Wasn't facial abuse purged from mainstream porn sites?

>>81821669 (OP)
I do feel really bad for the girls sometimes but I also can't stop watching

It's a grey area because they "consented" and thus it's "legal", but they were also coerced and tricked into agreeing to whatever.
That's under current laws, however.

The real truth is that (real life) pornography itself should be illegal and this would undermine any and all arguments and exploitation. No tricking someone into porn if porn itself is illegal.

>why specify (real life)
If you develop the literary or artistic skills to write or draw your own perversions, that's a creative endeavor and you should be entitled to do so. No one is harmed in putting to paper the product of your own mind.

>>81821669 (OP)
I hope society continues to become desensitized to extreme porn to the point that facial abuse is the only porn being produced. Whores deserve it.

>>81821720
>coerced
This is cope. There's NOTHING stopping her from putting the fries in the bag like everyone else. She wants to be a whore, she gets treated like a whore.

>>81821711
If you need another perspective to help you de-acclimate to porn, then try this one:
>watching a man fuck a woman
You're in the digital cuck chair.
I could at least maybe accept soft-core as appreciating the female body, but you're pleasuring yourself to the conquest of another man. That's gay as shit.

>>81821706
Only a few porn sites actually follow the rules, the ones trying to make money. Many of the others are subsidized purely to damage you psychologically by offering free porn (in an attempt to acclimatize you into the habit so you'll drift over to the pay sites / onlyfans).

>>81821720
I would argue that irl porn without plotlines and stories should be banned for lacking artistic value, drawings would not apply since a drawing is inherently artistic

>>81821744
I'm not attempting to defend women here, they're clearly retarded and shouldn't have the ability to vote or make such decisions.
However, due to being familiar with the industry, I can tell you exactly how such things happen.
>we want you to be a model!
>we'll pay for you to come out! Great for beginners!
>of course, we'll dock the pay a little for the flight, but that's only moving your pay from 20% to 18%!!! (or whatever the numbers are)
>girl flies down
>Yeah, so the photoshoot is porn and..
>oh, you don't want to continue?
>well, not only will we not pay you or your flight back, but you're going to have to compensate us for the flight over here...
And bam. Now she's faced with the decision to shoot porn or go into significant (for her) debt due to being tricked.
The people who do these scams are terrible people (jews) and it's hard to actually blame the woman given that there are actually innocent (on the face) modeling gigs.

>>81821760
>I would argue that irl porn without plotlines and stories should be banned for lacking artistic value
That's when you get the late night porn specials that are clearly just for the porn but have some stupid tacked on extra shit 'for the plotlines', like "oh no I'm escaping from prison and have to fuck my way past the guards, and the cops to not take me back, and also the taxi driver to get me across town", and etc.
And once you get that you get people who argue "look, porn with the plot is not really any different than porn without the plot, you don't want kids to see either you know?"
The simple truths are
1) Sex sells, and if given the chance culture and morals will cycle the drain until they reach the lowest possible point we as a society accept
2) jews will attempt to repeatedly lower the bar to both sell more as well as to inflict societal damage due to their hatred of europeans

>>81821669 (OP)
>how is facial abuse legal again
They agree to do it.
They agree to what will be filmed before going on.
They can stop at any time.

When you sign up to do porn for "Facial Abuse", you know what you're in for. Even if you don't, you can google and check their videos.

>>81821840
>late night porn specials
Why would porn air on tv retard?, when i am talking about porn with a plotline i am talking about stuff like JAV where it is sold in adult stores on DVD or whatever

>>81821711
The empathetic gender doing empathetic things to women that definitely aren't desperate. Just look at how much she clearly enjoys it.

This thread just makes me sad :/

/FAG/ Facial Abuse General active on /gif/ o'algo
>>>/gif/29124870

>>81821793
That us the cope. Go join Ukrainian military and cry that is still legal too.

>>81821874
so why cant children do it

>>81821905

>Why would porn air on tv retard?

zoomer detected

>>81821905
>Why would porn air on tv retard?
It would air on TV because it did?
How old are you to not remember this?

there have been porn producers have faced legal trouble for posting misleading ads and shit to get girls to show up and then pressure them once they're there.

i would imagine that women that under go this type of shit would be incredibly ashamed to step forward and do all the shit that they'd need to do to bring a legal suit.

this type of extreme porn should have stricter legislation surrounding it. in general there should be more legislation on what types of sex acts are allowed on camera. i'm finding it disturbing how so much porn is just casually throwing in slapping and choking. young folk are going to have some extremely harmful conceptions of what real sex looks like in the future.

>>81821711
women are signing contracts to do go through this while society tells incels they're so evil because they're "entitled" to one (1) girlfriend. Remember that.

>>81822232
i heard alot of horror stories like this, i really hope misleading and shitty producers like this get locked up

>>81822280
for real and then they'd have to face:
>but they signed a contract, they consented

even with vanilla sex it must be pretty shameful to have to go into a courtroom, have them show the video, then describe how you were cooerced and be questioned by defense... that's the only way these people would face legal repercussions.

imagine having to do that but with facialabuse after they've already broken your soul. i imagine most of these women do all that they can to just try to forget it even happened. it's very sad.

>>81821669 (OP)
They've been around for like 20 years, at this point the women know exactly what they're getting into. It's all fake trauma because rape is a popular genre. None of these girls are actually raped unfortunately.

>>81821793
This is not Facialabuse. Facialabuse are quite clear with what they're doing. Their videos are online for anyone to see before they sign. The girls can back out. Yes, they don't get paid if they do, but if I don't show up to work I won't get paid either.

What you are describing, however, is what Girlsdoporn did. That was shady as fuck. They advertised for "models", had a woman who worked for them assure the wannabe model on the phone that it was legit, they flew some fast food worker with a pretty face down to Miami, got her drunk, had her sign papers really quick, told her "by the way it's hardcore porn mmmkay", if she didn't want to do it they said the flights and 5-star hotel room would be on her dime, they assured her the movie would only be sold on DVD to overseas "collectors"... and then they just put the video on their regular American porn site. And no one suspected anything. For years. The site was praised for "how it finds such beautiful girls", "where do they find these absolute amateurs?!" etc.

So yeah, you're more likely to witness an actual rape if you jerk it to some "cute, willing college teen" lovingly sucking dick in a GDP clip, than a "crying latina bitch puking on our cocks" from FA.

What happens in front of the camera isn't real. What happens off camera is. This is true for most things in life, not only porn.

>>81821929
Me too. Why you'd want to watch anything except passionate sex between well endowed black men and beautiful pale white women is beyond me!

>>81821669 (OP)
>>81821711
Beautiful, every women should experience this at least one in their life

Making chicks who thought it would be hot to sign a contract, do horrible things to them THAT THEY END UP IMMEDIATELY REGRETTING AND NOT WANTING TO BE PART OF but not seeing it as rape and keep doing it because "hehehe contract" is straight up fucked up.