Thread 81871277

Imagine thinking China is anything like your dying shit hole

>>81871277 (OP)
chinks are the worlds biggest subhuman vermins along with poopjeets.

>>81871277 (OP)
China is the third world shithole, Sum Ting Wong.

>>81871277 (OP)
Kek, based winnie the pooh. I approve whatever that makes women more uncomfortable. The west will have to follow some day, the situation is not sustainable

>>81871277 (OP)
The only way to increase birthdate is to end the innsane culture of consumerism, and normalize sex between teenagers

>>81871277 (OP)
The economic situation for youth in China is pretty shit, just like the rest of the world. Why do boomers universally thinking making youths more stressed and poor will fix shit? Bachelor taxes, bachelorette taxes, none of it is going to move the needle enough if at all.

The based thing to do is a wealth transfer from women without kids to women with kids. The childless women have no stake in the future of China anyway. Why do they need excess wealth? They don't

>>81871339
China needs to make the whole education race not the only way to be somewhat succesful, as china is not that poor anymore its mostly a question of changing the culture

>>81871350
We will see about that. You don't know poverty but you will.

>>81871364
If any of your parents/grandparents own property, not really, you will get your bag of rice and old vidya and be happy

> ban abortion
As if chinks will ever have sex with anyone without the goal babytrap and extracting money.
You guys know that abortions are already basically banned in Japan, right? So women just chose to not have sex altogether.

>>81871536
They need to put some drug that supresses impulse control in the water supply

>>81871277 (OP)
They can keep their 72 hour work week for slave-wages. Though they have also undercut the world by doing that and we Westerns still don't have a based UBI, or Keynes' 15 hour work week to compensate for the giant sucking sound of all the jobs lost in the past 25 years alone. Having anything to do with Red China since 1972, or since 1989, will always be a giant mistake. There will never be enough jobs in the West to employ everyone, especially on those hours and the wages are shit anyway. Fuck this shit.

>>81871277 (OP)
fake article

4gnwa

whats mad is I stumbled on a chinese vid about dating and their dating lives are like ours in the west, fancy that. Two seperate worlds and cultures, their youth united by shit dating prospects and crappy financial prospects. I will say though, I can get a 4 bedroomed apartment for the same wage I pay for my single roomed apartment, crazy. Although their wages are worse

>>81871350
Women in Niger living on a diet of sand and UNICEF rice are having 7+ kids each, westerners cannot use the "muh too poor" excuse.

>>81871784
thats just a race to the bottom though, we can all live off of condensation from pipes and bugs but we want an actual standard of living in the west, I dont see why I, a westerner have to enter breeding competitions with the third world for fear of replacement, its ridiculous. Lets just all turn into an indian megacity and pump out 17 children, fuck trying to make things better, fuck the standards my parents and grandparents had, we need muh numbers to fend off third world replacement to prove to our masters we can boost the holy GDP.

We should all aspire to the hive megacity slum.

>>81871784
The cultural gulf between China or the West and Niger is wider than the Pacific ocean. The expectations for life here is much higher than some warlord serfs. And you can't just take the goodies away and expect to instantly change that.

>>81871784
The difference between the west and Africa, Mr Shequelberg, is the standards of living. Can the African and the British get along with 7 kids? Sure. But the thing people mean when they say they cant afford to have a kid is THEY CANT PROVIDE A STANDARD OF LIVING FOR THE CHILD THAT IS ACCEPTABLE QUALITY FOR WESTERN STANDARDS. Fucking kike and and your Jew bastard shit

enter breeding competitions with thirdies to appease the government who are threatening you with extinction and displacement or simply ________ the government? hmm

>>81871277 (OP)
> Beijing seeks to ban abortion and *tax single woman*

Then the chinse government haven't been taxing them till now? Just because they're single women? Holy shit lmao. Foids are literally chosen, privileged ones and yet they still want more and more... before it gets too late we'd also better ban them from voting, seriously.

>>81871812
this wouldn't even work in the west because it'd just force all the migrants to start breeding even harder

>>81871810
hey dont insult jews. jews are the only reason gays aren't burnt to death anymore. you should be grateful.

>>81871277 (OP)
We should follow after China, unironically. If (((women's rights))) universally leads to extinction, then its no question lol

>>81871277 (OP)
Competent governance is so beautiful when you're used to menopausal-bureaucrat-managed gibs economy.

>>81871955
Lets be honest, there is no way china is fixing their birthrates

Rights are nice but if your society collapses there won't be rights either.

>>81871784
Dude, people in africa can culturally and acceptabily just not feed their kids and leave them to die. Like its just a norm there that you dont feed a child past infancy and leave it to seach for scarps in trash bins like wild dogs. Hence why africa has such high child malnutrition, there is plenty of food there, it's just that african adults eat it all on their own and dont share with offspring. Who survives is up for nature to decide.
If western women could afford same level of cold hearted barbarism, trust me, they would also pop out kiddos like its nothing.

>>81871277 (OP)
How do I (a single white Australian man) get a loving wife from a less fortunate country?

>>81872086
Ok, but is it really impossible to have 2 children in the US?

>>81871983
Another amerimutt cope. If they actually fix it, I'm learning chinese.

>>81871277 (OP)
Source? Can't find the article, so I just assume its made up?

>>81871835
And Jews use gays the same way they use women, flattening wages. Its all unmitigated kikery all the way down

China is better than America in everyway. Americans have no freedom, high taxes, and our f f government is full of hatred towards its citizens. America only cares about stealing from Americans and giving the money stolen from us to the blacks and Israel.
In China you are allowed to own a house. The majority of citizens in China have housing. In America home ownership is not allowed, only a very small minority have housing. There is nothing good about America. China has a few problems, but by every metric they btfo America out of the water when it comes to finance, freedom, diversity, etc. America pedophilia child rape is legal and encouraged. In China they execute child rapists instead of giving them billions of dollars. Average non White Chinese iq is above 100. Making them much smarter than average non White American (84 and over half the population is illiterate. In China 99.9% literacy rate. <80% of American women are meeting clinical definition of obesity or overweight. In China only around 10%. China has rare earth mines. Chino has all manufacturing. China has superior military tech like hypersonic missiles, something that has been around nearly ten years and America is still too stupid to design even one such missile. They can't be that complicated because two other countries better than America in every way have also developed hypersonic missiles; Iran and Russia.
It is pure hell being stuck in this miserable far left shithole

>>81872185
Are you paid in Yuan to post this?

>>81871983
Yikes. There's a lot to unpack here. I can't even, so let's unpack this. China is much more likely to fix the population problem. America is currently at war with middle and lower class. This is by design to prevent them from being happy or starting families. They bus in illegal criminals from Mexico and Africa to make things even worse. In America if you do crime they measure your skin color. Jaywalking and White? You sick fuck $6,000,001 fine and life is prison without parole. Gangrape of a child? Hmm I see yoe are not White, yoe are sentenced to being given $5,999,999 and the parents of raped children will make a public apology to you or else they go to jail for ten years out of contempt
This would never happen in China

>>81872209
Are you paid in retard juice and tacos for every post you can't refute?

>>81871595
You are hallucinating and need Seroquel. Nothing you said has any basis in reality. 0 Chinese people work 72 hours. A lot of Americans do though. Did you confuse china and america in your delusional post? Did you post a picture of a man about to have a friendly conversation with a man in a tank when you meant to post ice thugs kidnapping grandmothers from a grocery store?

>>81871350
If the tax is high enough it surely will.

>>81871277 (OP)
You will never be Chinese OP

>>81871277 (OP)
What does banning abortion mean in this context? Is it banning all of it, even in the cases where the woman's life is in danger? Or is it just banning elective abortion? Or banning elective abortion past a certain week of gestation? Because some of those possible bans I'm completely okay with.

>>81872111
>really impossible to have 2 children in the US
If the parents both live together and make 50k a year and live in a relatively cheap state, sure.

>>81871277 (OP)
>GUYS CHINA IS VIOLATING PEOPLE'S CIVIL RIGHTS!@!!!!
That's literally their entire shtick. Being a news journalist must be the most bullshit job on the entire planet. Nothing to write about unless a natural disaster, war, or Donald Trump tweet happens.

>>81871277 (OP)
What's even the problem with having low birthrates? Shit will balance itself out eventually

>>81873255
If it is unnaturally spurred, then balancing will only occur when the unnatural force is let up. Not to mention:
>the importance of powers in numbers on the global scale (economic, industrial, and of course martial)
>the rocky economic fluctuations of a weird demographic pyramid
>the rocky cultural fluctuations of a weird demographic pyramid
These are all threats to stability, the goal of civilization.

>>81873255
>What's even the problem with having low birthrates?
Please explain to me how society works when you have 5 retired people for every 2 working adults for every 1 child. It's a demographic crisis. Too many non-workers.

>>81873316
Just let the old people die or create more efficient ways of caring for them. Keeping our current population at or above replacement just isn't sustainable. And no one has an interest in doing that anyway.

>>81873287
>threats to stability, the goal of civilization
And creating policies to torture people into having more kids is good for stability?

>>81871277 (OP)
Uh oh conservatives the commies are banning abortion now. And since anything communists do is automatically bad that means you must be pro abortion now.

>>81873345
people need life stability to have kids, money's not enough when you can be laid off at any time and don't get paid enough for real savings
and capitalism doesn't allow that, Dengoids went too far.

>>81871277 (OP)
You are chinese troon

>>81873332
>Just let the old people die
Non-answer. No one would accept this in the real world.
>create more efficient ways of caring for them
Answer that only works in a perfect world. Huge swaths of people in most democracies are opposed to raising taxes to pay for social services like taking care of old people. Americans won't even let the government give them socialized healthcare and you think the civilized world would just magically support subsidized living for old farts?
>Keeping our current population at or above replacement just isn't sustainable
Correct, but we aren't even near the population plateau yet. It's supposed to people around 10-11 billion somewhere in the 2080s. If you were born in 2000 then you will live to see the most wildly unsustainable period of human history.

>>81873345
>torture
You really think so? Anyhow, even if so (and that's a big if), there is a tradeoff to be made in giving up pleasures/desires for long-term stability.

>>81873388
>No one would accept this in the real world.
You see though, that's exactly the option people are picking. And precisely for the reason you pointed out. No one wants to pay for it. We've all already decided to just let them die.