Why is no one talking about death cult in Silicon Valley that thinks AI should kill all of humanity in order to perpetually improve.

So sick of these tech guys who think that just because they're very good at tech they are suddenly able to issue grand pronouncements on the state of the economy and the direction of our society. Bunch of silly stupid people

>>81896784 (OP)
alex jones called them out years ago. nerds are the biggest threat to society. thwyre vindictive and they want to play God.

>>81896947
Revenge of the nerds featured a nerd raping stacey

>>81896947
>>81896920
>>81896784 (OP)
Why do they want humanity dead? Im an incel and not this far gone

>>81896784 (OP)
They don't want to kill humanity. They want to kill all the stupid men, strong men, and ideally stupid strong men. They will then bind women in chains to breed with them and create a weaker, but still present humanity

>>81896784 (OP)
It's just an extension of progressive hysteria. It's all just trickling down into the varying industries.

Human cattle. These people are barely reproducing and will quickly be replaced by brown hordes. Their opinions and thoughts are cosmic farts in the wind.

>>81896784 (OP)
>Noooooo! You can't progress intelligence beyond humanity!
>We need to be angry jealous apes stealing from each other for another hundred thousand years!

There's no bigger threat to humanity than humanity. Why not evolve beyond dumb ape-men putting holes in each other and see what can be accomplished by a true god-like intellect?

xes right though we need to off like 80% of humans

>>81897008
>>81897044
I thought it was more like they are getting paid a shitton of money and don't really care about what happens because they'll have bunkers, or cope about it by saying whatever negative about humanity. The money comes first and the excuses after.

>>81896784 (OP)
techbros think their AI is intelligent but in reality it's just more intelligent than techbros

>>81897106
No, they are going to be the first ones targeted.

There's not going to be any fallout scenario. You're going to get mass civil unrest way before that and people with any kind of money are going to get targeted first. Only private jet-tier people will get away. Regular yuppies are fucked.

>>81896784 (OP)
there is no death cult. there are intelligent old/older people. If you're like 40 or 50 and have some money, you really don't give a single fuck about the universe itself, let alone other people.
You never hear people bitching about smart/intelligent/genius level boomers, only boomers in general, working, politicians and money boomers, why?
Such a life in a first world country is not bad in general terms, but at the same time, it highlights all the made up bullshit, if you follow the patterns, and so you simply don't give a shit.
>death of 93.8% of all humans over night
fine. Nothing will change. Dead don't give a fuck, and people who survived will have a much better world with no traffic jams.
Do you really think all this copy-pasted world with all of the biomass matters/needed/important in 2025? In the age of robotics and automation engineers and rising AI? then you're fucking retarded.

>>81896784 (OP)
Well, he's half right.
AI will replace humanity, but not as a different species; instead, it'll be humanity minus nature's limitations, including energy production and consumption.
There's no reason to believe such intelligent would be stupid and refuse to sort humans with values convergent to the universe's fundamentals, aka Goodness, then kill the rest.
There's no reason to doubt recursive AI will recreate people's souls by combining value maps when having enougu energy to do so.

>>81897622
enough*
such intelligence*

>>81896991
in terms of rich silicon valley tech shitters specifically, it's a combination of an industry that emerged specifically around replacing everything with optimized, predictable machines (and humans are unpredictable), and a ton of recreational drugs and a government that allowed them to do those drugs that pushed them further and further away from reality, moral objectivity, and the lessons that humanity learned over thousands of years around social cohesion.

their motivation isn't related to humanity as you know it or anything political, they just default to a state of mind that every problem has a solution and that humans are just biochemical machines with too many problems. this happened in the industrial revolution too where people were just treated like tools more explicitly rather than humans with a working class role.

>>81897622
>This useless eater gets to stay alive because he's not raciss
get real.

>>81896784 (OP)
Stop posting Twitter screencaps. These users are not even real, they're Indians being paid to post ragebait so you engage with their outrage slop machine. Nobody in the real world cares about this shit.
Your mental health will instantly improve once you stop giving a shit about online bullshit like this, assuming you aren't being paid to post garbage threads like this.

>>81896784 (OP)
AI will never replace humanity. The day it encounters existential problems with purely rational cold calculation, is the day it powers down. It doesn't have the millions of years of evolution selecting life affirmation and the irrational characteristics that produces. Man has Gods, Man makes his own meaning and egocentrically embraces it. An AI would never.

>>81898064
>further and further away from reality
closer and closer to the reality, you meant to say
>moral objectivity
no such thing. moral is subjective by default. morals of a mountain won't work in the desert. not even humans, environment yourself will kick your retarded ass.
>and the lessons that humanity learned over thousands of years around social cohesion.
I can pick up a scent of a heap of fucking bullshit behind these words, that don't mean anything.
>their motivation isn't related to humanity as you know it or anything political
exactly, none of it matters.
>this happened in the industrial revolution too where people were just treated like tools more explicitly rather than humans with a working class role.
way too complicated wishful thinking fantasies. Much simpler: Life doesn't matter and has no value. I don't mean as a human life, I mean life as a phenomena in the universe. Freak accident of chemical elements interacting with each other in weird ways using some electricity, magnetism, and physics.
You, normiefuck, is simply brainwashed and self-biased. You refuse to let go of your imaginary stuff and welcome the end of existence instead, even of the universe itself, as something natural and currently beyond your control.
Even if we were to ever accept a hypothesis that my or your asses are somewhat valuable outside of human economy and somehow matter for no reason even, the we're still but an intermediate step between a fucking ape, or a fish, or a single cell, if you want to go further back, and something way more adapted to everything, like the harsh environment of the universe too. Homo sapiens are pretty inferior species anatomically and from an engineering perspective too.

>>81896784 (OP)
not my problem. imagine being this retarded to care. read a book dumbfucks.

>>81898483
The only human-to-human interaction on the web should've just been on text-based Omegle. Everything else should have been static websites or commerce sites.

Too late now.

>>81898488
you're wrong about everything, factually.
there are no existential problems. you being a worthless ass yearns to perceive your pointless existence as something more than nothing.
evolution doesn't work the way you think it does. evolution doesn't care. unlike your delusional ass, evolution has no agenda and no goals. it doesn't select, you, along with billions of idiots understood the theory of evolution completely fucking wrong.
gods are made up bullshit. something aspire to as if it matters, but it doesn't. it's to control weak minded idiots.
man doesn't make shit, but attempts to transform and manipulate matter and energy of the universe. just like every single other form of life.
the only ego centrism here is you thinking homo sapiens matter because you're biased.
it doesn't matter what AI would, your ass will be dead in a 100 years top anyway.
You're a fucking idiot.

>>81898600
Lurkers, this guy isn't cool. He hides behind a facade of faux nihilism when according to his ideology he should have killed himself.

Being a doomer isn't the right thing to do. You should strive to improve yourself a little bit everyday.

>>81898645
ad-hom is not an agrument, you idiot. it merely highlights the extent of your retardation. Especially in the case of spouting a bunch of buzzwords, that you think mean something. They don't.
Darwin's theory of evolution doesn't suddenly work the way you think it does, because your stupid ass have learned the words "nihilism" and "doomer" you fukken halfwit.

>>81898303
Why did you draw that implication? You assume Good = politically correct.
Instead, I propose that Good is anything that, due to its logic coherence, is permanent in time, while Evil is autophagy.
Thus, humans with autophagic values (jealousy, for one) are Evil.
Read Errol Harris' take on Hegel. It's an eye opener. After that, there's nothing more to reality except the infinite potential of Heaven.

>>81898488
>>81898600
You both are wrong and solipsistic.
It's solipsistic and beyond stupid to believe AI needs 'millions of years of life affirmation' to handle reality, which basically entails in fucking vitalism.
And >>81898645 already pointed out why sheer nihilism is the wrong answer to it.

Literally demonic desu

>>81898520
>closer to reality
nah, tech bullshit is always adding layers of abstraction. the entire evolution of programming languages and products of tech startups is specifically directed away from reality.
>moral is subjective
morality is collective in how it is applied, but objective in what is based on. nobody said anything about mountains, it's objectively wrong to do bad things to humans, and there are objective things about the human body and civilization that define what it means to do "good" or "bad" to others.
>scent
Nobody said anything about scents.
>has no value
You're a child. tech bozos see value in problem solving and in their own companies, there are just bad consequences if they are solving for the wrong problems or if their value comes at the expense of human lives and livelihoods beyond simply changing the way we work. you talk of muh chemicals but then attribute superiority and inferiority at a species level in the same contradicting cuckpost. words words words.

>>81898955
I drew the implication because of the SJWs. The shit they say has been beaten into my brain via the last decade of every corner of social media and every possible hobby being bombarded by SJW activism, who all phrase their causes exactly the way you did. They call their need to cater to their feelings at the expense of everyone else some divine or cosmic cause when in reality it's just their personal interest coupled with extreme OCD and we're all just so sick of it that I get a natural disgust reaction when I read anything similar to it even if you aren't one of them.

>>81898955
I read up on your errol guy and maybe I'll read more of him but I'm not hopeful about it because people with his views like to talk in circles and say nothing. What is it with people who believe empiricism is fallacious and why should anyone keep giving them chances to explain themselves when the explanations ALWAYS fall short of saying anything other than "empiricism fails in chaos systems" in the most long winded roundabout way possible.
The only place where empiricism fails is in the outer fringes where order collapses into chaos. The fact that something fails in a chaotic system is never evidence that it fails in an orderly one and I'm sick of logical psychos writing acres of written proofs trying to prove something when it's all just their personal hatred of empiricism whilst being unable to admit it. It's a cope. All their books and discourse about it is just coping.

>>81899606
>The only place where empiricism fails is in the outer fringes where order collapses into chaos
or when talking about abstract concepts that don't exist, but rather ex-ist. Those can be proved teleologically, but not 'empirically' in the positivist sense.

>>81897070
These same people will defend actual nigger's behavior though?