Fembots, plesse answer.

How does the concept of being penetrated make you feel?

it's SHlT

>>81920311
Would you prefer to be doing the penetration?

>>81920298 (OP)
quite indifferent, sex is mostly appealing to me because of the intimacy more than anything

>>81920298 (OP)
Does this low level fetish thread make you feel better?

>>81920337
No. I just want to hear thoughts

I feel immense jealousy that Chad will notice you, dominate you and you get to submit to him. I dont get to submit to Chad, i have to die alone.

>>81920311
>>81920327
These are guys
No tits + timestamp= you're talking to dudes

>>81920327
Is the reaction in porn largely fake? It doesnt feel overwhelmingly pleasurable?

>>81920360
or maybe i'm just not a whore

>>81920352
You just want a fetish thread
Do a service to the community and get tits plus timestamp retard

>>81920365
i think it's probably overexaggerated, but i don't really know how pleasurable actual sex is because i've only tried it with toys

>>81920368
You're a women orbiting a board of "incels" you're only not a whore because you can't have sex over digital space yet

>>81920373
No, i want to live vicariously. If i wanted a fetish I'd go to /soc/

>>81920393
Maybe your thread should be on there

>>81920390
>orbiting a board of "incels"
Not an incel safespace. Quit crying.

>>81920417
You want attention while very possibly just being a dude
Tits plus timestamp or fuck off

>>81920404
Well it isnt, its here. Deal with it

>>81920441
>still crying
Okay, incel.

>>81920462
And it's low quality

>>81920487
>low quality
Like every single thread on /r9k/.

Maybe fembot will post the panties they will be wearing when Chad penetrates them

>>81920487
Threads ok, one annoying poster is bringing the quality down

(You)

>>81920562
>(You)
As is always the case: the ones always complaining about low quality are the one making low quality posts.

>>81920562
>>81920581
>Gets called low quality
>Just some low effort fetish thread where op a male talks to females(males) fetishizing sexual aspect
>N-No this is a real thought provoking query

>>81920598
Spot the low quality poster. I guess your usual spam is quality?

>>81920298 (OP)
retarded question how do you think it makes us feel? how does the idea of penetration feel to you?

>>81920936
It must feel nice, feeling a dick sliding in, feeling stretched out, knowing that at that moment in time he wants nothing more than you, feeling embraced and wanted and desired

Also its really nice when he knows how to fuck, like when you cum, he stops for a moment

>>81921005
yea i need to experience this soon

>>81921005
>feeling a dick sliding in, feeling stretched out, knowing that at that moment in time he wants nothing more than you, feeling embraced and wanted and desired
Better yet question, OP: why do you think these are exclusive to the experience of being penetrated?

>>81921026
It feels good having a big dick in your pussy but only when drunk, otherwise it can be so uncomfortable.

>>81921338
Just an assumption. Am i incorrect?

>>81921662
Well, you're a guy too. Don't you feel embraced and loved while penetrating? If not, then it harkens to a very dsngerous assumption: that men have performative burden in sex as a natural state and should give love, never receive.

>>81921746
No, i feel nothing but painful disgust

>>81920298 (OP)
>please feed in to my fetish, you must redeem my fetish
Found the jeet.
Hello saar.
GAHAHAHAGHAHAHAAH

>>81921837
Im a latina bimbo with huge tits and bum, try again cuck!

>>81921815
I see, so you have gender dysphoria.
Contrary to what propaganda has told you, it's a socially imposed condition. Men have to be dehumanized to the point of transitioning to women so they receive a modicum of love because capitalism demands men to be providers, and threating such position would imply overcoming capitalist propaganda at a symbolic level; meanwhile trans agenda pushes another market niche and individualizes the contradiction faced by men.

>>81921868
>larping autogynephilic chud
GHAHAHAHAGAGHHAHAHAH
Autogynephilic chud AND Indian? Pick your struggle, nigger
GAHAHAHHAGHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>81921898
>I spam the board with sissy porn because muh oppression forced me to
KILL YOURSELF AUTOGYNEPHILIC CHUD
GHAHAHAGHAHAHA

>>81921898
Incorrect, im a Chad. I can get any woman i want. Im very handsome. Tall. And charming.

When i have sex with women, their mouths hang open and they want sex. I dont want sex. I want to be a woman. I want to be them. Its a form of living hell.

>>81921972
I don't see why you made such logic leap.
I'm a man who resists feminization as a solution precisely because it endorses self-destructive beliefs, such as male disposability end gender empathy gap as natural state of things.

>>81920298 (OP)
i feel disgusted and angry at god

>>81922029
You'll crack soon

>>81922029
and*
88ikiiorigun

>>81922029
>word salad
NO ONE CARES, AUTOGYNEPHILIC NIGGER
GAHAHAHAGAGAHAHAHAHAHA

why don't you go dilate for Donald, you freak
GHAGAHHHAHAHA

>>81922045
No, I won't. As a principled human being with a steadfast belief in dialectics, I don't see contradictions as the truest state of reality; instead, they're an open gash, and capitalism thrives in the keeping it open, to deny sublation. This reflects in the masculine gender role condition.

Yes, it's a harsh reality. But I understand that this universe is infinite in time, so all that is good and logically coherent is bound to happen, and finite, autophagic concepts are bound to fail, including gender dysphoria.

>>81922090
You have a medical condition. Normal, cis men dont have to tell themselves this shit

>>81922152
Or rather, they don't have to because they never questioned their gender roles. That doesn't mean they like the contradictions faced by men in capitalism; rather, they can't voice them out without being dismissed as 'eggs' and 'not real men' because 'real men' don't care about degradation.

Your logic is exactly the type I'm condemning: forcing men to believe that their abusive gender role based off capitalist private property logic is natural, so if you criticize it, of course you're a woman or a non-man.
Despicable.

>>81922199
>abusive gender role

Nothing wrong with men providing and protecting. Infact the vast, vast majority of men would love that. If you ask the average man it they would be happier earning more than enough money to support their wife and kids, they would reply absolutely.

That you consider this role "abusive" makes you the abberation. Because even if a man doesnt desire children, he still doesnt consider it abusive. Thats what you say to distance yourself from your desire to be provided for and protected.

Like a girl

>>81922304
>Nothing wrong with men providing and protecting
There's nothing wrong with providing and protecting as values; there is a lot wrong when this is exclusively ascribed to men AND made nearly impossible in today's world.
First of all, protection implies there is something to protect from, which pressuposes the permanence of danger and problems that can be solved in order to keep a gender role just for the sake of it. Not to mention providing in capitalism is getting increasingly hard.

>>81922347
And again, ignoring that such roles are imposed by agendas for specific reasions (capital reproduction) instead of a natural urge.

>>81922347
Oh, so men didnt protect and provide a thousand years ago? Men didnt approach women in ancient Rome or Greece?

Capitalism is only 500~ years old Which economic system would you blame your failure on? Fuedalism? Mercantilism? If we suddenly had a Socialist distribution of resources do you think women would suddenly be like "wow let me approach this man who cant make me feel safe or loved"

Would you sit around in hunter gather times lamenting gender roles, whilst ooga booga Chad slays a mammoth, brings it back to the cave and sleeps with all the cave women?

>>81922367
>roles are imposed by agendas

They're imposed by virture of reproduction. Thats why resources are seen as attractive, its why men insist on sex and women select for sex.

Youre inability to understand this dynamic is present across all civilisations over thousands of years just reveals how shallow your thinking is, and that you actually lament that you havent gotten what you wanted just by existing, which has nothing to do with the current dominant economic system lol

>>81922367
>roles are imposed by agendas

They're imposed by virture of reproduction. Thats why resources are seen as attractive, its why men insist on sex and women select for sex.

Your inability to understand that this dynamic has been present across all civilisations over thousands of years just reveals how shallow your thinking is, and that you actually lament that you havent gotten what you wanted just by existing, which has nothing to do with the current dominant economic system lol

>>81922402
Yes, anon. History has cummulative effects, so is the dialectic motion of reality. Capitalism sublated Feudalism and Mercantilism's contradictions while bringing new ones to the table, while at the same time assimilating previous achievements in other systems.
For example, capitalism's global scope only exists because there was mercantilism in the past. Capitalism is the final product of a succession of synthesis, and of course there are problems who are yet to be resolved; that doesn't mean they aren't problems.

I recommend you reading Errol Harris' work on Hegel and the ontological natue of history and reality.

>>81922433
>They're imposed by virture of reproduction
Perhaps in your abstract caveman notion of what 'ancient people' did.
Imagine reducing an entire sociopolitical framework to the desire to have sex, then have the balls to call others shallow.

>>81920298 (OP)
Haven't actually experienced it, but I crave being penetrated so bad. I genuinely think almost all my problems in life would go away if a man fucked me.