Political red pill for you
>Even in strongly Republican counties, around 30-40% of residents are still liberal, which lowers the average fertility rate. The reported rate of 1.76 in "most Republican" counties is a mix of both groups. Using that and assuming liberals have a fertility rate of 1.37 (as seen in "most Democratic" counties), we can estimate that conservatives alone likely have a fertility rate around 1.93 to 2.02 close to or at replacement level. This suggests that liberal residents are indeed dragging down the average in red counties, and that conservatives, in isolation, tend to have significantly higher fertility rates.
Thoughts? I often see lefties claiming the birthing crisis is due to men not being liberal enough.

>A recent chart from Family Studies shows fertility rates by county political leaning, with the most Republican counties averaging 1.76 children per woman and the most Democratic counties averaging 1.37. While that already shows a gap, it's actually understating the difference. Even in the most Republican counties, about 30 to 40 percent of residents are still liberal. That means liberals are dragging down the average fertility rate in red counties. If we isolate the conservative portion using a weighted estimate, and assume liberals have a fertility rate of around 1.25 (which is likely, once you account for conservatives inflating the average in blue areas), then the true fertility rate for conservatives is probably closer to 2.10 or even higher-above replacement level. This also means the real fertility rate for committed liberals is likely well below 1.37, possibly in the low 1.2s or even high 1.1s. So while the chart suggests conservatives have more children, the corrected analysis shows the ideological fertility gap is even wider than it appears. Conservatives are likely sustaining their population or growing it, while liberals are on a path of steep demographic decline.

fertility discourse is a gigantic nothingburger and not even remotely a threat compared to demographic replacement

everywhere around the world fertility rates are tanking and anyone still thinking it's west-only is years and years behind

the only thing that matters is the flood of non-whites

>>81926174
>fertility discourse is a gigantic nothingburger
It isn't a nothingburger. It reveals liberal ideology to be the problem.

>>81926174
>ahhh all the bangladeshi are going to outbred us
>Bangladesh fertility rate for 2024 was 1.91, a 11.79% decline from 2023
>wait, what

>>81926060 (OP)
Its because leftist men are pussies who dry up women not because leftist men are against kids

>>81926192
it's not about outbreeding you, retard
it's about them being physically bussed and planed into the country by the millions every year

their fertility rates could be 0.5 and there would still be enough browns for the next 50 years to continue flooding western countries until whites are a tiny minority and all culture of that country is lost

you gigantic fucking idiot
anyone counter-signaling this in any way I will simply assume to be a shitskin at this point

>>81926192
Yeah the problem is that there's a gazillion of them already and if we allow them into our countries they can easily outnumber us in our own lands.

>>81926060 (OP)
>the high estimate for democrats
>>81926156
>the the more likely estimate for democrats
Even for both, conservatives are at replacement rate

>>81926060 (OP)
>raise people right wing
>the shitty economy for everyone except the rich pushes them left.
Tale as old as time, most well-known left-wing historical figures did not have left wing parents.

>>81926222
Like marx' who came from a pretty well off rabbinical family.
Well I guess mussolini was an exception, he turned right but he was socialist for a long time because his father was a socialist.

>>81926209
>>81926210
I completely agree that current immigration rates are excessive (and drive down labor prices and opportunities for natural-born citizens) I'm illustrating that other anons point by showing even shit holes like Bangladesh and Mexico are falling in tfr so it's not helpful to discuss.

>for these groups to grow, they have to rely on conservation more than retention
is this not just admitting they are a genetic dead end suicide cult?

they've painted themselves into a corner
every criticism they level against white people becomes about them if they have kids
>earths resources usage
>co2 emission
plus happy family is rightwing coded, have to own the chuds by being single and not playing into the male gaze

>mfw "I can't breed" was not a accusation but a confession.

>>81926060 (OP)
A community really needs to be hyper trad before its birth rates are above replacement, like dyed in the wool with people abstaining from modern pop culture. Even the Mormons are seeing rates drop below that.

Basically there is no place in the modern world for.. the modern world. It will die and decay away leaving only those able to resist it or the lowest trailer trash with baby mammas with 6 kids with 4 different fathers. The future is going to see massive inequality because the only high IQ people will also be incredibly "reactionary" and holding sway over droves of dysgenic subhumans. There is going to be a huge gulf between the idyllic communities of white Christians and ghetto gangsta favelas.

In any case we exist in a very brief period in time where pic related can exist, they are not long for this world. Something to bear in mind whenever insufferable r*dditors post.

>>81926298
Who gives a damn if reproduction affects the environment? Isnt that just fucking nature?

>>81926376
>Who gives a damn if reproduction affects the environment?
progressives do friend, thats what this thread is about..

>>81926333
I don't think significant genetic differences in IQ will survive a world of genomics and CRISPR

>>81926174
Kek the lefties really think this is their salvation, that the immigrants will be grateful and keep voting on them when their values are completely different and clash with the left faggot values, its easier for they to join the comservs after reaching and agreement or making their own party than support left degeneracy and policies that oposes their own culture and values

>>81926382
Yeah it ties into the whole
>Ugh the world is already overpopulated
Mindset

>>81926333
No you just need to fuck women alot, black communities have babies all over the place and arent close to trad

>>81926386
White leftards think non whites have a notion of "the good white people" and are always shocked when a black or brown brutally fucks them up for no reason
>But but I help you colored folks why are you being so cruel to me
When in reality this piece of shit would call a conservative who demands decent treatment from black and browns a white supremacist scumbag. God I hate white progressives

>>81926402
Thats what he said tho

>>81926395
The settlements are congested, the actual land area is extremely underpopulated

>>81926402
>black communities have babies all over the place and arent close to trad
That's not even true tho

>>81926439
No its true you see teenager with niglets all the time in ghettos, even if black women abort alot, they still shit out kiddos unlike the useless genetic shit called white women who would rather buy a small dog than breed with their own NONCHAD men.

>>81926436
They usually focus on absolute numbers more than that but I suppose they will combine the two when they are stuck in traffic.

>>81926174
Its not a nothingburger if the reason why immigrants in the 3rd world are flooding the west is precisely because of a decline in fertility rate which translates to a shrinking of working age people. And you actually do need to have a given population of those kinds of people to sustain the jobs and infrastructure aswell as a level of competitiveness that makes industries competitive otherwise you risk remaining economically stagnant. Apart of the reason the united states grew so rapidly to prominance is because of its population growth from 2.5 million in 1800 to over a 100 million by 1900, most of that was due to immigration but also from having a reasonable fertility rate.

I have a feeling the response will be muh economy as if the power a nation has doesnt matter.

>>81926395
>global warming will finish us off, we're goners
>it'd be cruel to bring another human being into this suffering (t. white canadian female)

>>81926491
99.99999% of the time, the roastie is actually saying

>Heres a nice moral sounding mask for me refusing to get baby which would put me off the cock carousel and I woud rather die than not be a depraved whore

>>81926376
Apes don't but humans should. Fucking primitive cavemen from 20k years ago could figure this shit out dude and enacted various methods of population control. They understood that if there is too many of them in one tribe they all starve. There are still villages in China that practice polyandry exclusively to limit birthrates and avoid exhausting the land they live on. But modern rightoids are truly uniquely low intelligence, probably long term effect of toxins created in industrial revolution. Taking care of your own home so that its roof doesn't collapse on you is a no-brainer.

>>81926060 (OP)
What about matrilineal dna being more substantial than patrilineal?

>>81926385
Neither the christian fundamentalists with their religious strictures nor the trailer trash with their unplanned pregnancies are inclined to genetically modify their kids.

>>81926402
Women can abort and use the pill, people who fuck just want pleasure, not families. Either people are too stupid to use contraceptives, like said trailer/ghetto trash, or they choose not to, like the christian fundamentalists.