>>81940937This is such BS. It has everything to do with intentions you're right about that, but you're absolutely full of shit to imply that she didn't want to sleep with him "because his vibes were off" or some other intangible woo-woo magic shit. She just isn't attracted to him. Cut the fucking gaslighting you aren't convincing anyone except yourself. It's very disingenuous.
The result would have been the same even if he had "pure" intentions (whatever the fuck that's even supposed to mean) God forbid a guy has such selfish, dirty ulterior motives as wanting to have SEX with his WIFE. What a creep!
The difference is if he had such pure and authentic and non-performative (only sociopaths describe human interactions in this way) intentions, instead she would feel "sad" because her husband oofy doofy is SUCH a nice guy and he is SO kind-hearted but she just DOESNT want to have sex with him and she totally feels guilty about it (but still won't smash though)
Don't ask a fish how to catch fish. They just wait and then bait appears, it's all magical to them. The fisherman who caught them surely had pure intentions, if you aren't catching fish it's not the bait you're using, it's some mystical force beyond comprehension. For women things just "happen" and then they make up BS post-hoc rationalization for it after the fact. Nevermind the guys that smashed who had nothing but the intention of fucking and leaving, their personality detector must have malfunctioned o algo