Explain whats wrong with this without sounding mad

>>81952741 (OP)
>Explain whats wrong with this without sounding mad
The only thing wrong is no one admits we live in a gynocracy

>>81952741 (OP)
Nah. It's perfectly reasonable to get mad as hell about inequality and injustice. Men are right to be enraged at women's high standards. Gender relations won't improve until women get the fuck over themselves and stop being unfair. It's that simple. I will die mad about it.

>>81952741 (OP)
Men are kinda uglier than women in a aessthetically sense though.

>>81952741 (OP)
Because it is incompatible with civilization

>>81952741 (OP)
It's not fair. If something isn't fair, that means it's bad.

>>81952741 (OP)
those 7 men at the bottom are no longer willing to contribute to society and everything starts breaking down

>>81952741 (OP)
It causes a lot of men to be lonely.

>>81952741 (OP)
It dooms ~80% of men to cucked oofy-doofy / incel hell.

Nothing. That's literally how natural selection works in the vast majority of species on earth. Those that cannot, are unfit to pass on their genes (you know it as well as I do)

>>81952761
is that bad though? a society like this should not exist then.

>>81952741 (OP)
>70/30
more like 95/5

>>81952756
>In a aessthetically sense
>Can't spell
>Can't use grammar well
Ten pounds of makeup on your face doesn't mean you actually look good braindead whore

>>81952758
I'm not reading all that, but basically polygamous cultures have more wars. Monogamy was only invented to bring peace.

>>81952779
You can always date and get fucked by the ugly guys anon. Dont feel sad for them, be fucked by those guys

>>81952741 (OP)
Hypergamy creates a lot of single mothers, and the offspring that come from single mothers are statistically far more likely to end up as criminals and be generally less successful in life.

>>81952786
>Monogamy was only invented to bring peace
No it was invented so that men could have a drive to cherish and provide for society, you can't doom a good 80% of men to inceldom and expect those same men to give a fuck

>>81952769
Female selection would result in a species of sub-80 IQ violent sociopaths with severe spine and joint problems due to being 7 feet tall.

>>81952775
ok society fails
then the 7 men band together and pillage and rape and murder to claim the women for themselves as humankind slows to a halt
no police
no cars
no food
no electricity
nothing but apes killing each other for scraps

>>81952806
Imagine if all the males in the world were masculine, cute, tall guys... I really hope female selection keeps doing its job.

>>81952810
>nothing but apes killing each other for scraps
but thats what women love

>>81952819
but would they sacrifice the ability to post pictures of themselves online for it

>>81952827
>but would they sacrifice the ability to post pictures of themselves online for it
they never though that far ahead

>>81952816
>masculine
Hyperaggression and lack of emotional control is estrogenic, that's why the more violent races tend to have higher estrogen and lower testosterone.

>>81952758
Hey that sounds similar to my post

>>81952806
If their selections were bad they wouldn't have evolved to be the ones who are making the selections

>>81952849
Women evolved to create laws which prohibits men from speaking to women?

>>81952836
I dont care about race. I just want female selection to keep working so I can be a sugar mommy in 2050 to every tall, masculine guy.

>>81952810
I still would argue that this is not necessarily bad, simply natural. why should we be any "better" than other animals?
but I actually believe what will happen is that the 7 men band together and thn implement monogamy by force, then socially we are the same as 100s of years back. humans will complacent again and give women rights and the same thing happens again. the pendulum will swing between (actual) patriarchy to societal collapse.
women are kind of a bottle neck towards utopian society in which everyone can be happy.

>>81952856
Yes obviously if this wasn't what nature intended it wouldn't have happened

>>81952865
Nature doesn't "intend" anything, it's just a bunch of random shit happening. Species go extinct all the time, sometimes due to retarded female sexual selection. One day humanity may be one of those species.

>>81952886
>Nature doesn't "intend" anything, it's just a bunch of random shit happening.
There was so little pushback to the suffragete and feminism movements, women loved the idea they'd get more power. Then it's 2025 and women are realizing they are working long hours like men, away from their children like men, and some are questioning "did we get bamboozled!?" only took 100 years

>>81952769
Except we are a species cursed with intelligence who pretend that one day we will reach the start, nature never intended us to leave the planet which is why female selection is retarded

>>81952906
They don't actually believe it. They're only saying those things in TikTok videos so you stick around long enough for the ad roll.

>>81952886
Lots of species exist and continue to exist because of female selection. It is simply how things are. If female cats went for the top 3% of male cats you wouldn't be advocating for female cats to change their ways

>>81952906
being a wage slave isn't "more power". women simply want to get paid to exist.

>>81952860
you dont seem to understand whats going to happen
the tall men will die
you place a target on the backs of those you disproportionately select in favor of
when society fails, the many you reject will devour the few that you desire, both metaphorically and maybe even literally
7 > 3, numbers always wins

>>81952864
>why should we be any "better" than other animals
self-actualization, self-awareness
sapience, basically
we are better than them, factually, the very existence of the language by which we communicate this is dominant proof of that

and theres no reason for the 7 to revert to monogamy until resources start wearing thin and the bones of the era have been picked clean
and due to how massively populated the earth is by humanity at this point theres a ton of really fucked up stuff that can happen before that comes to pass
like aforementioned mass cannibalism
law of the jungle is not the utopia youre looking for

>>81952927
>They don't actually believe it. They're only saying those things in TikTok videos so you stick around long enough for the ad roll.
Women don't really "believe" anything. Why do you think 70%+ of people in a cult are women? They go with the consensus

>>81952741 (OP)
I get no pussy and I must scream.

The problem is that when they're old hags they try to leech off of the guys they previously rejected

It's truly despicable, parasitic behavior

>>81952940
Are they doing it naturally or because of an endless deluge of weapons grade jewish propaganda?

>>81952962
>an endless deluge of weapons grade jewish propaganda?
Do you seriously believe you don't sound schizophrenic when you say this? Maybe this is exactly the reason why no woman is selecting you

>>81952986
>Maybe this is exactly the reason why no woman is selecting you
Why do women chose serial killers and rapists over him?

>>81952986
Nta, but seriously, everyone who talks like this should die.
If it's so obviously not true, argue against it instead of making childish remarks with no substance.

>>81953001
They are more manly than he is and gets shit done (rape and murder). Even other men respect these murderers more than him.

>>81952986
If I've never been selected how would they know what I have to say?
>>81953001
Because they're tall.
>>81953016
You are a woman.

>>81952947
>sapience
sure, sapience and being able to use tools makes survival easier for us. but it also has its drawbacks, what other species suffers mentally to the point that they would kill themselves? despite having everything survival requires.
the 7 men already have enforced monogamy in various cultures around the globe independently from one another. they will do so again, because after being tired from the law od the jungle they think civilization is worth pursuing and civilization only works if every working age man gets pussy. otherwise as you said, they will become bandits. I still stand by my pendulum theory.
I phrased it poorly: by utopia I meant, a civilization in which everyone was happy. but since female choice means only a few men will be happy, womens rights are the bottleneck. and if you deny them of the rights, you do not make the women happy.

>>81953042
No, I'm a man who can see the primal tribal reality. Power garners respect and fear is respect.

>>81953001
That's just what makes the news you see a headline that a woman dated a serial killer and conclude that that's the norm. Think about people you know, are their moms all dating serial killers and rapists? Probably not
>>81953042
Maybe they would consider selecting you but then you suddenly sperg out about jewish propaganda and they move on

>>81953003
He thought he made a compelling argument with the cats thing but cats don't have Tinder and Instagram to widen their search radius to the entire planet, so they are still mating with the top 3% of cats available to them because they don't have an insidious ghoul overriding their biology by whispering in their ear to wait for better. Human women will hold out for eternity until it's their turn to be called to Dubai.

>>81953059
You are the equivalent of a shabbos goy for women. I don't think simp is quite the right word.
>>81953063
>Maybe
had to resort to hypotheticals award

>>81953073
Literally just leave the maybe out. Pretend I said They would consider you and then you sperg about jewish propaganda and it dries out their pussy immediately

>>81952741 (OP)
if 7 out of 10 males were to suddenly opt out of society because they can't get laid the civilization would collapse

>>81953093
They can't opt out they're biologically wired to be too desperate

>>81953088
Still a hypothetical since it's never happened. Keep trying.

>>81953106
Clearly you're doing something that keeps them away

>>81953117
Yeah it's called Existing While Sub8.

>>81953123
And that is natural of course they don't want your inferior genes

>>81953063
If it's so rare why do they need an app to catalog all of the criminals they keep accidentally getting nutted in by?

>>81952741 (OP)
It's expensive to have kids so of course only the top dudes are going to reproduce

>>81953134
>average guys never had children
You argue jewishly.

>>81953140
Does your mom keep a catalog like that?

>>81953046
suicide isnt a human concept, plenty of living things willfully die in pursuit of natural goals, its just not something you consider parallel because those animals cant communicate their emotions in a note beforehand
let me borrow from your appeal to nature here and liken it to a sort of natural failsafe, when a creature finds itself in an environment unsuited for it it may suffer mentally to the point of pursuing its own death so it does not maladapt to that environment in a way that creates an abomination at odds with nature, reproducing to create further sufferers when a more adaptive organism can adjust to the environment properly and not suffer the same way
this is fitness, nature at work, by your own measure theres nothing wrong with this

>men will get tired of rape and conquest
wishful thinking
starvation is a better motivator

also
>if you deny them of the rights, you do not make the women happy
i thoroughly, absolutely reject this idea because its founded on the assumption that woman with freedom are happier when every single ounce of evidence we have currently at our disposal indicates the opposite
the modern woman is fucking miserable
and the more decisions she makes, the worse things seem to get for her
at the very least, if youve ever tried to order dinner with a woman youd know how much they fucking hate making decisions

>>81953161
No it was invented by a gay man for 20-30 year old women who are using it as a shopping list.

>>81953160
Sorry when female peacocks select a partner they go for the most impressive one, not some beta cuck peacock

>>81953171
Humans Aren't Birds

>>81953171
Why has hypergamy only become a problem in humans, the species we're talking about, when smartphones were placed in their hands? Are smartphones natural or were they an invention?

>>81953169
Some fag inventing an app doesn't prove that the majority of women date serial killers. As if everyone who's taller than you is a serial killer lol

>>81953188
We're arguing with an autistic zoophile. It's no use.

>>81953146
>he thinks only rich people are having children
You might actually be more retarded than the other guy.

>>81953188
And? The concept still applies women don't want the men with beta cuck genes
>>81953191
It's not a problem

>>81953198
You saying it's not true doesn't prove anything either. At no point in recorded history have women felt the need to put together a database of the dangerous men they all keep having sex with.

>>81953218
>it's not a problem
Yeah I'm sure that only Africa having a birthrate above 1 will work out well for everybody. You complete fucking retard. I know you're just trolling but I really do want to rip your throat out and beat you to death with it.

>>81953218
>And? The concept still applies women don't want the men with beta cuck genes
Right, like I'm going to take uneducated anthropological shitposts on 4chan seriously. Touch grass and eat a dick, looooooooooooooooser.

>it's natural, this is how things have always be-ACK

>>81953228
Birthrates are out of control in africa because they don't have access to contraception. If they knew how to use condoms they would have normal birthrates too
>>81953221
You saying a gay guy made an app doesn't mean the majority of women catalog serial killers they've fucked

>>81953270
>normal birthrates
>below 2.1
You're so fucking bad at this.

>>81953263
>men started whining in 2013
Possibly because they crave going to war it's been too long since they had to struggle

>>81953282
Yeah there weren't wars to go to in 2013, absolutely no possible way to deploy to a warzone in 2013.

>>81953278
It is true though their birthrates are higher because they can't use contraceptives

>>81952741 (OP)
Im having a hard time understanding wether the people in this thread are being sarcastic or if they are being fr .

Have you guys stopped believing in the blackpill ?

>>81953289
Is using contraceptives natural?

>>81953286
Western men started having too comfortable lives in 2013 leading to them posting on the internet like the beta cucks they are

>>81952741 (OP)
Lots of men die sad and alone. Lots of women become single mothers.

>>81953297
>t. a beta cuck posting on the internet

>>81953294
Yeah? If it wasn't humans wouldn't have invented it

>>81953308
Are comfortable lives natural? Humans invented those too.

>>81953313
They're natural and?

>>81953329
Then why are they a bad thing? Or are you going to pretend >>81953297 wasn't you or you didn't agree with it until just now?

>>81953333
Well conflict is natural too

>>81953342
>everything that i need to be natural to win my argument is natural, even plastic sleeves to artificially prevent sex from conceiving a child because uhh humans invented those

>>81952940
>Lots of species exist and continue to exist because of female selection.
Probably because the females of those species aren't degenerate goblins who select for violent dysgenic retards.

>>81953350
Yes because it is natural, comfort and conflict can both be natural at the same time

>>81953360
The only proof I've seen for this claim is
>a gay man invented an app

>>81953364
That's great. Now to get back to something resembling a point. If women are simply mating with the top men, why are they refusing to have their children? Sexually reproductive species NATURALLY want to reproduce. Why don't women want that anymore?

>>81953374
>what are conjugal visits

>>81953379
Because having children is difficult and the government doesn't support them enough

>>81952741 (OP)
it makes moids butthurt that we actually have standards unlike them who are desperate for sex from any subhuman creature and they get jealous because they can't do the same, that's about it. it is because men and women's anatomy are different. sperm makes it possible for one to have low standards. eggs make it a must that you are picky choosy. good thing hypergamy is the law of nature that will continue with or without men who are seething they couldn't make the cut.

>>81953390
It's not natural for the government to support children

>>81953390
Is the government picking and choosing who gets to have children still part of the natural order? Because I see plenty of nonwhite foreigners who don't speak English with triple wide strollers and even more kids getting dragged along on foot everywhere these days. Wasn't like that when I was a child. I wonder where they get the money, since they're supposedly refugees or poor downtrodden immigrants or something.

>>81953385
what percentage of women do you think are in a relationship with an imprisoned murderer

>>81953385
Conjugal visits existing still don't prove that most women date serial killers and rapists

>>81953392
Keep doing what you do if it finds you happiness.

>>81953409
Well it's more than 0% which indicates a complete breakdown of society.

>>81953392
>law of nature
samefagging to try and get out of his losing argument award

>>81953379
Are you retarded, it's because childbirth is painful and raising them is also a pain in the ass so women who have the option not to do it will of course avoid it. This shouldn't be difficult to figure out if this is not your first day on Earth.

>>81953410
It doesn't matter how many get to do it. What matters is how many want to.

>>81953427
And that's a problem

>>81953397
>>81953407
I just said women should receive more support when they have children.
When immigrants immigrante they take their children with them, they had them while contraception was unavailable to them

>>81953171
>Sorry when female peacocks select a partner they go for the most impressive one, not some beta cuck peacock
"I just go with the guy with the biggest dick, I don't care what happens after that, even though I may now be with child to him"

>>81953443
Find someone that will support the kids prior to having them.

>>81953427
>childbirth is painful
Somehow this is only a problem now, when they have drugs for it, and not at any point in the last 70,000 years?
>and raising them is also a pain in the ass so women who have the option not to do it will of course avoid it
But I thought women were just animals following their natural biology? Do you know what happens when other animals start refusing to mate?

>>81953392
Your "standards" are like if males everywhere suddenly started saying "if you're under 5'8" then you're not a real woman, 90% of women have ugly chopped faces, you need to have G-cup tits to talk to me".

>>81953424
i just came here now and didn't read your retarded "argument". learn the meaning of words, it will help you get less upset about them.

There is nothing at all wrong with it.

Women have more options than ever these days.
If a woman can be with someone they find attractive, why shouldn't they? Why should they lower themselves all for some vaguely defined 'greater good' like we are all in some robotic star trek colony or something?
Men don't have as many options, but we have things like music, video games, movies, anime, online communities like 4chan.. just infinite entertainment. Being alone doesn't mean being an isolated sadsack anymore. Even if men are restless from being alone, they are still happy to a degree.

We don't need any more population growth. Populations are leveling off, even in the third world. More western countries are starting to reject mass migration and focusing on investing in its own citizens. The so called 'rise of the right'.
Futures looking bright. Just enjoy existence.

>>81953430
Not every woman wants to have a conjugal visit
>>81953448
They pick the most attractive guy with a big income you can't blame them for that
>>81953454
That's not what I meant, the government should make it as comfortable and as easy as possible for women to have children if you want to promote birthrates

>>81952741 (OP)
Because it is artificial. Mass media brainwashed girls to be one way and boys to be another and eventually 70% of boys find they have virtually nothing in common with the girls and can't get to the same parties or even talk to them without girls screaming "EW" and instantly wanting nothing to do with them. Whereas in the past they'd all be part of the same community, boys would learn how to get along with girls and thus there was more monogamy.

This is all completely unnecessary, it doesn't have to be like this, we could have simply said "no" when we still had a functioning society built on centuries of western culture in the 1950s. In fact it is not if you move from whatever liberal college town you live in. Further modern society is decaying, fast. White birth rates have dropped while muslims and other traditional groups continue to poop out lots of kids.

As a society we need to accept things are not as simple as individual freedom. Women are not "hypergamous" as per the /r/incels meme limited to the top 30% of men. We do not have much more freedom than we did in the 1950s, we merely view corporations and the state as our "tribe" instead of our local community, we stopped being "manipulated" by people we live and interact with, who might care about us like our parents, and started being manipulated by electronic entertainment and people who imitate something they saw on TV, controlled by suits who behave like sociopaths in the pursuit of profit or political power.

>>81953443
Why isn't contraception available to them? Why do only some countries have access to this technology?

>>81953495
>They pick the most attractive guy with a big income you can't blame them for that
I suppose I expected too much: "BIG NUMBER OOOOH"

>>81952741 (OP)
before modern comforts you suffered the risk of a riots younger class that wanted to burn it all down. now however the only major concern is the upside down pyramid being made where there are not enough young people to hold up the operation of society.

>>81953437
If you were female you would be doing the same.
>>81953464
It has always been a problem retard, so many mothers were dying during childbirth. Do you think women in the last 70.000 years were choosing to be broodmares? You are so out of touch. Why did you randomly decide to seethe about appeal to nature arguments, something I never made to defend your rapist tendencies?

>>81953495
>They pick the most attractive guy with a big income
My neighbor has people living in both a garage and a shed because his fentanyl addict family can't stop fucking. The only person in that house with a job is the mother, who is a school crossing guard.

>>81952777
considering how plagued with bots trying to scam wealth guys and the near 4 male accounts to 1 female account ratio I be surprised if it didn't look like that.

>>81953510
Idk you'd have to ask an immigrant
>>81953513
What else to expect? They can't pick the ugly poorfag and raise children with him

>>81953495
Why? They haven't needed to do that in the past. Even currently, countries with fewer social support systems have higher birthrates.

>>81953525
If I was a female I would be in the wrong for doing the same.

This board's inability to understand basic statistics will never not be funny.

>>81953525
>something I never made
>>81952940
>>81953016
>>81953059
>>81953134
kill yourself

>>81953188
we are a basic animal it's just we had the power to beat out our biology, birds don't have hormonal birth control and, massive and cheap food distribution systems and the means to explore the internet. We fuck everything up and now we are acting like we are above shit when the reality is we were just like them not too long ago and we haven't changed we just got better at lying to ourselves.

>>81953493
not to mention men also pick the most attractive options if they are able to have their pick, think gigachads and rich men. it just makes sense to pick the best one if you have multiple options.

>>81953525
>something I never made
I had to cut these last two off because of the robot.
>>81953171
>>81953218
kill yourself again

>>81953379
On average men have ~4 children on average after winning the lottery, women have ~0.5 children after winning the lottery.
In other words, only men want children for their own sake. For women, children are just a means to lure in providers, and an active detriment if they have the means to take care of themselves.
>>81953427
This is why they need to be forced into it

>>81953530
LMAO this is what incels wish the world looked like? but i thought no hypergamy meant civilization

>>81953542
if high birth rates are so great go live in niger instead of your below replacement rate country then. oh you won't. why?

>>81953567
What kind of people play the lottery?

>>81953493
>>81953564
Women have more options because men are nice and see the average woman as beautiful. Men have less options because women are terrible and see the average man as ugly. Simple as.

>>81953552
Most people don't consider how the data is gather or what it's actually expressing. Normally they just back fill the absent data with what they want to be true. It's like how people get made when they take an action or make a bet with a 90% chance of success and fail/lose thinking that is bullshit not understanding that 90% doesn't mean you are going to make it, it just mean there is a 10% amount categories that will make you fail. Works in reverse too, if you are in a situation where you want something with a 90% failure that doesn't always mean you give up on it, many times it means you figure out what those 10% did right and replicate it.

>>81953581
I probably will move, just gonna milk the system for free higher education first.

>>81953549
What is wrong about not breeding like pajeets?
>>81953556
>>81953566
I didn't post these. Now answer the question.

>>81953540
>Idk you'd have to ask an immigrant
you lost award

>>81953540
>What else to expect? They can't pick the ugly poorfag and raise children with him
I'm trying to find the "detecting misogyny on the internet" meme

>>81953561
>we are a basic animal it's just we had the power to beat out our biology, birds don't have hormonal birth control and, massive and cheap food distribution systems and the means to explore the internet. We fuck everything up and now we are acting like we are above shit when the reality is we were just like them not too long ago and we haven't changed we just got better at lying to ourselves.
Please refer to >>81953251

>>81953605
Why are you even posting yourself then?

>>81953567
If forcing women into it was the way, Africa would be a utopia right now

>>81953601
differentfagging so i don't have to defend my failed logic award

>>81953542
Times change and if they want to at least try to fix it they should grant more support

>>81953601
Having no kids is unfulfilling in the long term, just look at the anti-porn activists. A bunch of older women with no kids, blaming porn for their failings.

>>81953587
yeah it's all because heckin mennerinos are all innocent angels who have so much love to give and not because having ovaries means you must have high standards and having testicles means you can have low standards

>>81953626
You haven't explained why more governmental support would solve the problem. Everything I've shown points towards the opposite being the case.

>>81953639
>heckin mennerinos are all innocent angels
No, but somehow only the ones who aren't are having sex. Shouldn't it be the other way around according to you?

>>81953617
Accusing random users of being each other so I don't have to defend my retarded positions award

>>81953561
>we are a basic animal it's just we had the power to beat out our biology,
The majority of Women can't beat feels over reals. Even if the Men are feels over reals they are still providing a biological and work function (tradesman who fuck everything that moves)
If the majority of Women don't practice discernment, or they are controlled, then they will just end up as single mothers on Onlyfans, which isn't helpful for the future structure of society

>>81953610
It is a scientific fact that Homo Sapiens are mammals and not birds. Would you like me to cite a source?

>>81953651
You mean you jumped into that line of questioning while not believing humans are like all other sexually reproductive mammals, which was the supposed other guy's entire thesis? Why would you do that?

>>81953650
yeah yeah chads are all evil and you are such a nice guy for sure

>>81953672
Explain single mothers (who aren't widows (of men that they themselves killed)).

>>81953604
It is objectively better to have children with a rich person than with a poor person it has nothing to do with misogyny
>>81953649
Imagine if the government bribed people to have children like I'm sure if you offered money more people would be willing to do it

>>81953681
Incel moids bailing out after sex

>>81953696
>incels who had sex
I fell for obvious bait this entire time award.

>>81953692
>It is objectively better to have children with a rich person than with a poor person it has nothing to do with misogyny
You assume the mindset between a rich person and a poor person considering children is the same. Consider the children handed off to nannies by rich parents. Consider the children that learn Spanish before their native tongue due to the hired help

>>81953654
how is us picking chads over incels feels over reals? it is just the logical choice

>>81953692
>feels based argument
Okay, I don't care to argue anymore

>>81953703
>incels who had sex
Elon Musk

>>81952741 (OP)
>be a bee
>for some reason be smart enough to consider having the life of a bee
>"explain what's so wrong about immediately dying if you use your most basic self-defense method"
there is no problem. the only problem is that, like with everything, i'm too aware

>>81953692
Yeah haha imagine, and what if they did it by only giving that money out to the kinds of people they wanted to have children? Wouldn't that just be so natural selection or something?

>>81953616
Well they do have the healthiest fertility rates, and constitute an increasing share of the global population.

>>81953671
What do his posts have to do with me saying women avoid childbirth because it's difficult?

>>81953718
You mean the women who intentionally got basted with his donated sperm to secure alimony? So that's five women, what about all the others?

>>81953681
we don't have this problem in my country lmao amerimutt the entire world is not like the niggers in your ghetto sewer hometown

>>81953639
>"UMM ACTUALLY chadsexuality is a part of my biology, so it's okay for me to exclude 90% of men from sex!"
Okay, and hating chadsexuals is a part of OUR biology, so I guess it's also perfectly okay for us to hate and resent you. We're only following our instincts, right?

>>81953741
If you've seen Grimes' tweets I don't think she secured shit

>>81953654
Majority starts from 51%. Just saying it's the majority isn't informative at all. The inability to grasp the scale of things that you don't see is the most reliable sign of low intelligence.

>>81953733
Because all vagina-having animals have nerve endings so it would be painful for them too, right? And when they stop breeding, we put them on something called the endangered species list. I don't know about you but that doesn't sound like such a good thing ot me.

>>81953731
Nothing about Africa's birth rates is healthy

>>81953745
You almost got me, good thing you're posting from a call center in Hyderabad.

>>81953748
thank you for sharing your feelings but i don't remember asking

>>81953765
t. Aging population enjoyer

>>81953730
Make it apply to everyone you show up with a baby that matches your dna you get paid for raising it
>>81953707
It sucks for the child if the parents struggle to afford things

>>81953796
That's great, now ask yourself why this isn't already happening.

>>81953791
This is a public forum you retard, I'll respond to whatever post I want.

>>81953764
I don't give a fuck about animals. Humanity is far from being endangered. Human childbirth is known to be more difficult than animals because the head size is too large. If you think your arguments are so solid, go make them in a crowd of young women and see if it convinces anyone.

>>81953844
>Humanity is far from being endangered.
>appeal to "authority"
You got anything worth reading? Anything at all?

>>81953858
Says the one who cannot offer a single realistic solution and just seethes

>>81953844
Young women don't know what it feels like to be childless in their forties.

>>81952741 (OP)
The end of civilization.

>>81953745
Here's all of Europe btw. I thought this line was particularly hilarious:
>Mette-Marit additionally has a son from a previous brief encounter with Norwegian convicted felon Morten Borg

>>81953804
Because the government is ran by selfish cucks who want to keep all the money to themselves

>>81953874
>realistic
Of course going back to how things were before Tinder wouldn't be realistic because I'm just seething or something.

>>81952741 (OP)
Theres nothing wrong with that.
Incels bitch and moan about mmuh chad but realistically why should any woman date some ugly loser instead of a tall, confident, attractive , wealthy guy?
If anything thats good, it culls human garbage like incels.
Natural selection is a bitch.

>>81953711
>how is us picking chads over incels feels over reals? it is just the logical choice
*black eye single parent meme*

>>81953897
If they want to keep all the money for themselves why do they give so much of it out as welfare to...some people?

>>81953900
>natural selection
here's your 4x samefag award now go ahead and tell me how you just got here

>>81953910
To make it look like they're doing something

>>81953889
what am i supposed to conclude from this information? are you also planning to commit crimes to get laid?

>>81953923
>the entire world is not like the niggers in your ghetto sewer hometown
>what am i supposed to conclude from this information?

Like it's okay, it's not their fault. It's just that I've had to come to terms with the fact personally they'd rather a man that kidnapped them and raped them for 20 years a basement and then raped her children, than consider having a life with me. It's been a difficult journey.

>>81953898
Do you think women preferring Chad just came to be because of Tinder?

>>81953920
Who are they trying to impress?

>>81953936
I think women becoming exclusively Chad Only has just come to be because of Tinder, and every last statistic supports this.

>>81953942
The people? They do weird shit nobody cares about to make it look like they're trying so that people don't get mad

>>81953933
i don't think most women in norway are fucking criminals and friends with epstein

>>81953959
I was told this was only a problem in America. A European princess has a step son with a convict, who himself is now on trial for rape.

>>81953957
Which people? Do you think the people who aren't getting paid to breed appreciate these efforts?

>>81953974
you should try your shot with her since she has terrible taste in men

>>81953985
>you're a bad person because uhh you're not tall!
woman moment

>>81953979
Anyway point still stands women choose superior men because that's what everyone in their position would do

>>81953994
>anyways here's my original point that's already been debunked
NPC short circuit moment

>>81953993
>chad is a bad person because he is tall
man moment

>>81954007
>the opposite must be true
Another woman moment. No he's a bad person because he nutted in you and left.

>>81954002
It hasn't been debunked it's literally just common sense that women only choose the best it makes no sense to get mad about this

>>81954002
You didn't debunk anything

>>81954015
never happened to me personally because i'm not shaniqua

>>81954016
If it's so common sense why has it only started happening in the last decade?
>>81954017
You have completely contorted yourself into a pretzel over the course of 2 hours to get out of holding any particular belief for longer than 2 minutes. You debunked yourself.

>>81954016
Just do whatever makes you happy, I do wonder why you're here if that's what you're doing though.

>>81954023
But what if you did have breakfast this morning?

>>81954028
>Just do whatever makes you happy
Thats the axiom though, feels over reals, whatever makes me feel best in that moment

>>81954028
What am I doing?
>>81954024
It's been happening for longer but people had actual problems to worry about before that

>>81954024
Humans doing something for a while doesn't make it common sense. They used to open holes in people's skulls to fix epilepsy.

>>81954048
You're looking for validation on 4chan

>>81954037
it's not "feels", it's logic to pick the best option available when you have ovaries

>>81954067
Best option for what? What's the goal?

>>81954059
How is this validation? Are you projecting?

>>81954048
Oh so every generation since the baby boomers has grown even larger and has had more and more sex which is why this thread doesn't exist at all. My mistake.
>>81954054
>it's common sense, it just took us until social media networking was invented for us to realize we should all go after the same 0.00000001% of men

>>81954080
>Oh so every generation since the baby boomers has grown even larger and has had more and more sex
All thanks to women

>>81954079
Validation through getting a rise out of people you deem lesser.

>>81954078
you don't know what sex is?

>>81954067
>the best option available
What does this have to do with paying for Tinder so you can see entire countries worth of matches?

>>81954111
If sex is what brings you fulfilment, then I'm not one to judge.

>>81954111
What do your ovaries have to do with sex?

>>81954104
That does not validate me. If people get mad that's on them

>>81954155
Your denial falls flat

>>81954163
No it doesn't I only care about proving my point

>>81954210
Your denials keep falling flat

>>81954234
Think that if you want. Doesn't change that women are chad only and that is all natural and understandable

>>81954249
If it's natural why did it only just start happening at the same time as smartphones they can use to shop for Chad?

>>81954249
>proving my point
your denial falls flat

>>81954111
>you don't know what sex is?
think beyond the hot hot sex and giant dick and him choking you out.... oh wait, yeah I forgot you don't do that

>>81952769
If it were natural selection, men would just take whatever female they wanted.
This is unnatural selection where the weaker gender has selection choices because there are several social structures built around protecting and serving them.

>>81954263
If better options became more easily accessible to you you'd go for them too

>>81954269
>he doesn't know storks don't deliver babies

>>81954282
>has to get on an airplane to meet him
>easily accessible

>>81954279
are you ever going to stop crying about the fact that you can't just rape people anymore

>>81954293
You'd get in that plane too if you liked what you were offered

>>81954300
women aren't people thoughmstever

>>81954263
if women dating sub-chads is natural where is your girlfriend?

>>81954293
LMAO the hypocrisy of moids is unbelievable. imagine saying this as if moids aren't flying out to various countries like thailand and philippines with the sole purpose of sex. i bet you get butthurt when they call these old moids creepy. yet you are whining about women dating chads from another country. you cannot expect consistency from moids i guess.

>>81954309
>you'd do exactly what i do if you had the opportunity
>you are a bad person
choose 2?

>>81954318
My standards are too high

>>81954318
We don't live in nature anymore. >>81954279

>>81954300
>are you ever going to stop crying about the fact that you can't just rape people anymore
I mean there is some argument that marrying a bear or vampire or wolfman is a not a better outcome for humanity, but I realize, women never think about any wider consequences, just what immediately affects their tingles

>>81954334
>60 year old boomers who got divorceraped is the same thing because uhhhhhhh well if it's not i have no rebuttal

>>81954335
>i might be a rapist but don't you dare call me a bad person

>>81954335
I don't think you're a bad person for being unreasonable you're just unreasonable

>>81954356
>chad only is natural
>rape, an act only criminalized by human beings, is not
I'd ask you to make up your mind but we both know you don't really care.

>>81954355
it's not the same thing because women who date chads abroad are superior to these senile moids exploiting impoverished women

>>81954360
Asking women to date their looksmatch in their immediate area is unreasonable? Since when, Tinder's release date?

>>81954375
you should become a lawyer, your dedication to defend sex offenders is being wasted on /r9k/ arguments

>>81954377
It's only natural for men to use their status to get things

>>81954377
If it's not the same thing why is it hypocritical?

>>81954383
Yeah pretty much why are you mad at them for wanting to date attractive people?

>>81954386
You should become an hero, your dedication to insisting any sex had by sub8 men is rape is being wasted on people with brain activity.

>>81954289
>>he doesn't know storks don't deliver babies
useless rambling; avoidance
>>81954375
>>chad only is natural
>>rape, an act only criminalized by human beings, is not
>>81954335
He's making the argument that if he is hot enough, it was never rape

>>81954398
Because the ones who fail to do so (You) start whining about where all the good men have gone and why no one hits on them in bars anymore and it's time for someone to step up and raise this child, after wasting their prime years on a pipe dream.

>>81954396
because you only have a problem with it when women do it with chads

>>81954433
There's still plenty who don't have to settle and you can't let them be in peace you have to be jealous

>>81954456
You only have a problem with it when it's a man choosing to have sex with a woman younger than you.

>>81954456
Christ, you can't follow simple logic

>>81954475
How are we upsetting them?

>>81954478
so... are men incels or do they have an abundance of young women to choose from? Christ, you can't follow simple logic.

>>81954494
I don't think they give a fuck about you but you seethe about them for 200 posts which is concerning

>>81952741 (OP)
The evidentiary base for its claims
the small text below at the bottom of the page is supposed to cite a source, which this doesn't.
Either the poster is making things up, which is morally wrong, or it's not citing its source, which is sloppy and drastically weakens its efficacy as a messaging tool

>>81954494
You are jealous and entitled. You want someone to settle for you instead of looking for a better option and I just don't understand what makes you think you deserve to have someone settle for you

>>81954515
How does that affect yous personally?

>>81954529
I don't want someone to settle, if they can find a better man then good on them. I don't want them to have regrets later on when our goal in life could have been aligned from the start. Don't think that's good for society.

>>81954475
>There's still plenty who don't have to settle
You just keep on telling yourselves that.

>>81954500
>just get on a plane to buy a pet bro
ah yes, the Natural Order

>>81953993
No but being tall guarantees confidence and good genes in a man. Same with attractiveness and wealth to some extent.
Brokies and uggos are bitter

>>81954475
>I'm not some racist chud I don't see color!

>>81954561
>usa
LMAO

>>81954561
Incel propaganda. No women should have to settle for incel losers.

>>81954581
>and good genes

>>81952844
>I don't believe in the whole blackpill BS
Unfortunately, I do, mainly thanks to women than other men.

>>81954598
Probably has better genes than you limp writes uggo loser.

>>81954585
Name a single other country on Earth that matters.
>>81954597
Ok but I will call you delusional for thinking you're the one who will nab a top 1%er. What do you have to offer? A hole? Chad's seen one.

>>81954552
>if they can find a better man then good on them
Then just let them have their hypergamy without seething about it

>>81954606
Not good enough to make it past his 40s

>>81954606
He died of a heart attack at 46. What is it about foreigner hours that turns this board completely fucking retarded?

>>81954610
Incels be like
>women just want a decent man who makes the bare minimum and isnt a misogynist incel
>DDELUSIONAL

>>81954629
Better than being some fat greasy incel.

>>81954618
It's simply a difference in values, I value commitment and stability.

>>81954650
A fat greasy incel contributed by your shitty genes.

>>81954639
You do realize that greentexting things that no one said means you lost right?
>>81954650
You seem upset. Did Chad leave again? Maybe you should lower your standards. You...you are a top 8.7% female at least right?

>>81954659
No you don't you value demanding someone go on a date with you

>>81954610
>Name a single other country on Earth that matters.
China has more power, people and wealth :)

>>81954694
I don't, but I do notice that older women are alot more willing to.

>>81954700
Are you a chink? Is that what you're saying?

>>81954694
If it weren't for headcanon foids wouldn't have anything going on up there at all.

>>81954639
you seem upset at the numbers
sry but 100k and and 6'+ isnt bare minimum
hope this helps

>>81954705
And you don't date them because?

Feminist societies go extinct whereas patriarchal societies prosper

Natural selection amirite

>>81954734
Yeah, the bare minimum is 6'5" and $250-ACK

>>81954747
yup currently happening with another patriachal society (middle east shitters) taking over feminist europe

>>81952741 (OP)
I fully agree. Truth is 80% of men shouldnt even have rights. We should run a scan at birth to determine whose a uggo and will grow up an incel and who will be a normal, respectful male.
The uggos should be drafted and /or sent to forced labour in factories and not have to interact with us or decent males. Then we could send them to die in wars to kill them off when they cant work anymore.

>>81954738
Because I value commitment and stability. And I don't thing they would make good mothers.

>>81952753
None of that is unfair. No women should have to ruin their life by interacting with subpar men

>>81954756
This but for foids with the fat gene. It is genetic after all, right?

>>81954747
Western men too weak to slap their women and tell them to shut the fuck up does indeed lead to extinction

Feminists literally playing themselves

>>81952741 (OP)
im glad AI is developing so fast rn
soon we will actually have foids that are nice and fuckable

>>81952741 (OP)
It's simply wrong. That graph is nothing but an incel wank fantasy.

>>81954734
It is. 100k is barely enough. And 6.0 is still kinda small.
Anything below that is subhuman tier. Sorry not sorry moid.

>>81954770
replying to 4 hour old posts award

>>81952741 (OP)
Men will say it's true and women will say it's bullshit
/thread

>>81954788
lol, upset
YOU will remain coping
no good moids for you

>>81954772
Not the same. Curvy women are still attractive. Meanwhile most men are ugly af.
Chopped men epidemic.

>>81954788
haha you did it you did the meme >>81954748

>>81954806
>fat gene
>Curvy women
I see what you did there.

>>81952741 (OP)
Don't get upset when those ugly guys wake up and get violent or drop out of society then

>>81954768
>Because I value commitment and stability.
Why are older women not able to commit?
>And I don't thing they would make good mothers.
Why not? I think you just don't want to settle you expect top 1% women for yourself but you're mad women go for top 1% men

This thread is very blackpilling honestly.
Is that how women view us? I dont talk to or even glance at women. I work hard, i just want to buy a house with a nice bed and hug my plushies and women view me as an absolute subhuman and think i should be drafted or work to death?
Its insane

>>81954830
Why should I settle? Shouldn't I also try to find a better woman?

>>81954828
thats funny, because they do
>where all good men
>we need you working
>take care of my shit
>hello incels!??? please approach us!!!
>GO TO WAR PLEASE
lol

>>81954791
>>81954811
>>81954836
You're replying to a falseflagging faggot. Yes, women are that bad, but this is obvious bait.

>>81954830
Once women get into their 30s pregnancy is kind of risky. Why bother?

>>81954836
No it's all just bait. Do you really think moid is a real word?

>>81954830
Nta but olden women dont want me either. Same with fat women, drug addicts, single moms etc

>>81954828
> get violent

Won't happen. This crisis is about 20 years old. The 6 major Anarchy riots broken out when they couldn't get pussy for just a few years. Porn, games and drugs have broken men in a way they wanted


> drop out of society
I think they don't care and look forward to purging them out, look at all the propaganda demonizing incels, the goal is to make like what's going on in China where you can with force kill someone and get society to be OK with it because they weren't "contributing" Tech is going to fast and they need fewer people to salve away not more.

>>81954847
That guy is trolling but women absolutely believe this irl. It's why actual statistics like age at marriage, number of sexual partners before marriage, birthrate, etc., are all going in the opposite direction of a decent society.

>>81954876
I know, which is why I acknowledged women are that bad.

>>81954895
So what's the word for shitposting that looks like bait but is actually true?

>>81954843
>>81954850
Because you're a hypocrite you expect top 1% women for yourself and have an entire incel ideology centered around getting mad at women for having success with top 1% men
>>81954861
You might not be that bad as long as you don't expect women to settle for you

>>81954913
I already told you I'm fine with them finding a better man if they can.

>>81954920
No you're not if you were you wouldn't be here rn

>>81954913
I am not expecting anything, just telling you how it is.
Or are my standards of
>be a bio woman
>dont hate my guts
Too high?

>>81954913
>you'd be exactly the same as me if you could, you have to believe me, my entire headcanon is correct, it just has to be
how about no foid? do you really think you're a top 1%er who deserves to tame Chad?
>>81954927
If you were, (You) wouldn't be here.

>>81954857
Idk when I look at what women (coworkers or online) say at least in my country they kinda say the same thing. They even want to bring back conscription for men

>>81954927
What's the point in talking if you're gonna decide what my position is?

>>81954953
They're just venting that Chad dumped them, again. Remind them of this and maybe their head will explode. That way they'll be dead and can't say stupid things anymore.

>>81954937
Are you mad about women going for chad? If not I think you're fine
>>81954941
I'm not mad about women wanting to date the top 1%

>>81954976
But you aren't a top 1% so why do you accept extinction?

>>81954976
Not mad just kinda sad that ill never get a gf because i wasnt born attractive or rich.

>>81955002
Because I'm not entitled to have people be interested in me

>>81955025
You didn't answer the questiono

>>81955025
>sub8 men are bad for....wanting a girl to show interest in them
You're either a cat lady or the biggest cuck that's ever roamed the planet.

>>81954971
Well its pretty weird because this kind of reasoning and graphs doesnt really exist on francophone youtube or internet.
Even though its even worse here than in the US in terms of dating noone complains about it, people are just like
>yeah its your fault for being unattractive or awkward now just go to the gym and grind

>>81955034
I accept extinction because I'm not going to whine about being lonely like I'm 5 years old
>>81955020
I feel for this though, best of luck to you anon

>>81955086
So after all that, you're just another incel? How pathetic.

>>81955086
That still doesn't answer the question

>>81952741 (OP)
lazy niggers not trying to compete

>>81955108
>just be taller bro

>>81955104
Like I'm going to claim to be a woman to have 50 posts calling me a tranny instead lmaooo

>>81955131
Then why are you so desperate to defend them?

>>81955150
Defending who exactly?

>>81955159
>akshually it's natural for women to prefer doomscrolling for chad matches on the other side of the planet rather than date their looksmatch they go to school or work with
>you're just a bitter uggo chopped man incel pedophile rapist for disagreeing
This is you.

>>81955176
Yeah? Stay mad

>>81955189
>leave the post wall women alone!
I hope one of them sees this, so they can laugh at you too.

>>81955202
Oh no I'm going to be so upset about imaginary people laughing at me!

>>81952741 (OP)
One of these worked for millenia. The other is collapsing entire civilizations.

>>81955240
you seem pretty upset right now

>>81952844
This has been known for millennia but civilization has to relearn important lessons I guess

>>81955240
>women are imaginary
God I wish.

>>81952750
What do man boobs have to do with it??

>tfw your shitpost you made after waking up in the middle of the night and jerking off is reaching 400 replies

>>81955293
>spamming the same image over and over,
>shitposting
you don't even know what shitposting is

>>81955086
Notice how the cuck lashes out in impotent rage at anyone who cares about their own future but identifies with the meek passive sub8 for accepting their lot in life. He was raised by a single mother and has a Chad complex because of it.

>>81952769
This is just bullshit. Men are the more powerful and dominant and sexually charged of the two sexes. If things were "natural" we'd have our pick of any woman we wanted, any time we wanted, granted another bigger stronger man didn't want us having her. Instead, we're at the mercy of emotionally volatile retards with delusional standards and no accountability. If men weren't being completely pacified by porn and videogames they would have revolted by now. This shit isn't natural in the slightest.

>>81952849
Then why do single mothers need welfare to feed their child?

Why haven't the 7 incels banded together to destroy this rotten society yet?

You idiots could literally just kill the 3 top guys and then take all the women for yourselves.

>>81955469
Every single social force and law on the books is designed to prevent this. Coalfax? Shut down, doxxed. Tea? Number 1 app. Blacks have killed like a million white people since the end of the Civil War, no one cares. One competent white guy with a rifle in the woods of Idaho sets a fire and shoots two firemen and the entire federal government responds within the hour. One white father runs over a black kid who stole his son's bike and he's been charged with murder.
>muh natural order
What a waste of everyone's time.

>>81955274
foids are genuinely this stupid

>Explain whats wrong with this without sounding mad
Having such a large chunk of 'left-over' men, with nothing to live for, is never good for the health of any society or civilisation. Yes, being able to regularly fuck some cunny is everything to us men. Evidently, as we know well, we go insane when we are deprived of it (especially for years). As two generations of incels can attest.

>>81955710
Once again, retarted anon fell for a man larping as a women.

>>81957003
foid, faggot, what's the difference

This image has the illusion of making you think any man with a girlfriend is top tier. This is just not true.

>>81957118
Guys settle

>>81957136
Guys shouldn't settle, that's gross. women settle

>>81957147
Guys compromise their values to settle

>>81952741 (OP)
All guys should go to the 10/10 woman then it would be accuracy I think

>>81957154
you've not convinced me that only top tier men date, only that guys settle

>>81957165
Guys compromise their values and settle due to the dynamic described in the pic

>>81957191
it's kind of obvious when a guy is below average

>>81955262
Internet exists now, if it does happen again, there wont be a next time.
Also assuming we become smarter in the far future, we would eventually acknowledge that women sexuality hold humanity back

>>81957262
I don't understand your point

>>81957287
then why are you even replying to me? holy shit

>>81952741 (OP)
nothing, unless you want things to continue functioning because eventually things will stop functioning if a large portion of men get no pussy.

>>81957291
It was an indirect request for you to explain your point.

>>81957318
below average guys still get women so OP's pic on the right is not true

>>81956342
This, women have sex regularly multiple times a year minimum and then go like "What's the problem? You aren't entitled to sex, deal with it."

>>81957323
But I explained why that is.

>>81957346
no you didn't, you said guys settle but the picture shows the bottom seven guys getting no one. so it doesn't make sense.

It's incompatible with continuing civilization. The top 30% of males aren't having kids with the rest of females in actuality. They might sleep around when they are younger, but they later settle down with just 1. This leads to a large demographic decline that isn't good for long-term stability.

The replacement population isn't there. The current demographic decline is not sustainable on the long-term and will lead to a massive decline in industrialized countries or a cultural shift that will occur to late in the game to undo the damage of the demographic decline. You have 20+ years of removed/delayed response, so the people feeling the affects of the current issues will be a generation removed. They'll mostly feel the economic effects of being burdened with propping up an ever increasing population while being saddled with less economically. You see it now. In the short-term, this leads to instability. You have a large % of males with no families feeling they cannot get economically ahead at all. They have nothing to lose. However, people are too comfortable now to ever take actual action. In the long-term, you just have total stagnation and decline.

The standards by which women are judging men are largely idiotic. They aren't conducive to long-term stability or the advancement of society. They aren't picking the most competent, smartest, or even strongest/most athletic types with who they are picking. Their social standards need to change to be more in-line with reality. By the time they realize this, it's usually too late. If they do settle, it happens late in life at the point they can likely only have 1 kid - contributing to the long-term demographic decline seen in the past 50+ years. The current onus of men being the ones forced to pursue has tainted women's expectations. It's led to the disparity seen, yet no one wants to acknowledge that their own biases and filters maybe limited.

>>81957354
The picture represents a snapshot in time.

>>81957372
that doesn't say anything

OP is just plain incorrect.

The idea that women were denied rights and had to attach themselves to a man or starve, until 2015 or so is absurd. Do I really have to explain why in detail?

It wasn't like this after women got civil rights in the 70s, it wasn't like this in the 80s, 90s or 00s. It still isn't like this in many places. Feminists will say something like "oh, we couldn't have abortions in some states in the 90s therefore we are still oppressed victyms", even though literal truckloads of dead fetuses were accidentally spilled in the 1970s. Sure, "sexism" wasn't solved, but it was driven down to very low levels. Look at the chart, there were about as many women med students as men in the 90s, certainly by the 90s civil rights had kicked in. Your hippy grandmothers were having abortions, partying and being free, just like you, and so was your mother, except they chose to marry your nerdy grandfathers and father in her 20s anyway, because that was what they wanted.

Now, all of a sudden, for no reason at all, literally just within the past few years, women are rejecting ~60% of men and actively working to socially ostracize them, telling them they are creepy sex offenders and it is morally wrong to even talk to women. It is a self-fulfilling prophecy, boys are constantly told they are terrible people, entitled, insecure, fragile, every pseudo psychological term you can throw at them for every tiny thing nitpicked to make them look bad.

So these boys do what they believe to be right and don't "bother women" with their existence, they slink away to play video games, they drift apart from the girls, they don't bother with their appearance or the teenage ritual of learning to "rizz" the girls, ending up unappealing. If they are overwhelmed with a crush for some girl and approach her, the girls overreact and scream "EW" and shame them for thinking a low status male has the right to do this, everyone in society tells them they're bad people and they believe it.

>>81957383
Women lower their standards as they dry out and guys settle for whores

>>81957383
It does, it demostrates that low tier women get laid multiple times more than men of the same tier

>>81957402
that has nothing to do with the picture though
i just mean in terms of it being its own frame. too many below average guys date for that picture to have any meaning
I guess you need a sister or someone to show you standards mean nothing

>>81957402
Data wise they don't, nearly half of all women between 24 and 40 are single and without child, from that data it seems most women choose that path. They sooner die alone than settle, all this talk of them settling is just guys projecting what they would do.

>>81957413
That's reading more than what's given, the data point shows what they would partner with, not if they get laid or not.

>>81957413
but what it doesn't show is bottom tier men getting action

>>81952741 (OP)
That chart was a based on a dating app that is now in bankruptcy due to lawsuits of all the bots they made and exploitation of male accounts using fake female ones to get money off them.

No one has ever replicated this out side of dubious dating apps.

>>81957441
Those are just remnants of a past society, everything is trending in the direction of that picture.

>>81952741 (OP)
>Explain what's wrong with this (Pareto principle adaptation in hypergamy) without sounding mad
It bottlenecks the genetic variations of the species because it's men who have significantly elevated share in the potential outcome of the crossing-over phenomenon.
Uncontrolled hypergamy jeopardizes the very purpose that elevated sexual reproduction above asexual onens millions of years ago.
>A human female loses hundreds of follicles to root for a single maturable ova, 3 of which are simultaneously degenerated only to pass one unique and mature ova accessible only a week every month,
>while men create millions of unique sperms with all 4 unique results of each meiosis being presented for nature to take its course
I'm not against hypergamy, I'm just pointing that it has to be controlled. Even polygamy of the old world had better control than this international casual debauchery culture of ours.

>>81957502
>highest population in the history of humanity
>"bottleneck"
based retard. hypergamy just means women are marrying rich men, it normally increases the wealth of a country but yes birth rates will be lower for a little while

>>81957497
not your original argument

>>81952741 (OP)

It's a slave society. Slave societies are inherently unstable due to the ruling class needing to be better at war than the population they have enslaved.

>>81952741 (OP)
No fucking babies are being born

>>81957524
Okay, you win and everything is fine

>>81957518
>hypergamy just means women are marrying rich men
Do they though?
Sorry, but divorce statistics tells me they're doing business instead, it's not "marriage" per say.
I'm looking at the graph sexuality, rather than economically.

>>81952769
Natural selection is tuned to the paleolithic era dumbfuck

>>81957538
my sister is still dating a schlub drug addict

>>81957518
No it means they fuck hot guys and tell all the rest die or be their slave. Rich guys are just beta bucks to roasties.

>>81957552
It's not a graph and I guarantee you don't understand divorce statistics unless you are using the current 12% number. I'm saying that no amount of teenagers using the word "hypergamy" incorrectly matters, whatever problem the OP is referring to resolves itself within 1 generation.

>>81957552
My friend, you should consider how the graph was even made.

>>81957570
Betas don't have any money or bitches. "gamy" means marriage sorry!

>>81957564
He prolly has a brick dick

>falling for naturalistic faggotery
Anyone that uses naturalistic talking points is a retarded. You can justify ANYTHING
Get any random species and say that their actions are okay because it's natural. Godless people ALWAYS will devolve to degeneration since they don't have a moral anchor

>>81957847
the concept of god doesn't change anything. catholic priests were the most degenerate people in history. the cycle is mostly based on whether resources are abundant or scarce, easy lives create weak men etc. humans naturally adapt to their environment and always push their boundaries, it's a double edged sword.

>>81957577
>whatever problem the OP is referring to resolves itself within 1 generation.
I hope so

>>81957923
>God = christianity
Tard

>>81958062
>all religious people and followers of god are godless
bet.

>>81953493
Ok, then

>Make men and women truly equal under the law, no more pussy privileges
>Socially shame used up hags trying to find a provider after they end up alone
>Stop subsidizing single mothers
>Stop taxing single men to subsidize women in general

I find it interesting that back then most incels would just go and become raiders that simply raided and raped, these days its of course nearly impossible but woman hate their providers and raiders (since chad used to lead incels in raids) now we are stuck in a weird time in history.

And before le incels are not violent, its because they simply drown themselves in fantasys and detach from the world, it will get worse and women will be enslaved regardless, whether they execute all low tier men and become slaves to the top 10% who wont even work as their harems will, or replaced by machine. Regardless i see no point in becoming a "man" to impress a woman. If you know the truth about them you will never see them as something you want anyways.

>>81958493
"Incel" is a modern misandrist term used to disparage men. Trying to retroactively understand history through your tiktok brainrot lens is hilarious. Get real, retard.

>>81953282
And when was it exactly that women struggled, ever in the history of humanity?