>>81972517 (OP)
Because most lesbian art you are looking at is made by men. Make your own or seek out lesbian artists. I for one want to see female ugly bastard x pretty girl. . . Hgggfhnnnn
>>81972537 >made by men
Common misconception. Please inform yourself on artists. Most of the degenerate shit is also done by women, especially despair porn.
>>81972603
So am I. I just find it annoying when people talk about male gaze as if women just cannot enjoy something that appears sexual or would also appeal to guys.
>>81972684
I just find the term male gaze pretty reductive is all. Lots of female artists draw Yuri in a way you would consider male gaze I guess? So should we all assume it is by default not meant for women? I guess it is just the term that feels overused or maybe I am seeing too much into it.
>>81972724
but at the same time you're swinging for the fences on something that is on its own reductive. For example. A porn video is art but some will view art as less appealing. Now what's going to appeal more to male audiences. Same thing applies for art. Most financially successful artists follow what's popular
>>81972987
oh sorry
its just lesbian on male domination is a weird niche thing im into
ive seen groups of it online lol so im not the only one
i can still show u tummy if you want
>>81973012
I've known lesbians that have a no touching them rule and others that don't. There are still those who enjoy bdsm regardless of sexuality. Within that there are times where one of the lesbian couples partners is bisexual. Kinda like some open couples have a no kissing rule there can be other limitations to respect the relationships boundaries or partners comfort.
>>81973183
wait youve known lesbian couples with male subs?
I just wanna explore the concept I dont mind what theyre into so long as theyre not against having a male sub