Thread 82080826

To Women,

I resent you. I think you're batshit crazy and getting way too much validation about it. You're not even crazy in a transcendental baccanalian way, you're petty and awful and gross and meanspirited and less than the sum of all the effort others have put into you.You are a black hole of other people's goodwill and labor and affection and generally the most spoiled and corrupt hypocrite around. You're not getting better, you're not appreciating what you are being given or the men around you and it's pissing me off. Until you either own up to it or a hammer drops I don't think I like you.

Anon

>Last Thread:
>>82073104

>>82080826 (OP)
Have you ever had sex with a woman or been intimate in any form with one?

>>82080835
that is a very blunt and charmless way to datamine on 4chan.

>>82080835
>>82080843
If the govt is datamining here can they send me a 300+ pound woman with blue eyes. I just want a fat woman bros

>>82080859
There's an app for that, all you gotta do is pay the subscription. If you want others methods
>religious groups-deadass they give away women
>cold approach-i dont like this method and it's literally like playing a slot machine but its an option
>ask your friends or family/networking
>date a co-worker or uni peer
>let time do its thing and if it happens it happens or not.

>>82080826 (OP)
I challenge you to go read this post out loud to your mother.

>>82080889
Not OP, but my mother and I talk often about how awful women are today. I feel sorry for all the men who get pressured by their parents to find a partner, not knowing the current state of society.

>>82080889
I challenge you to recognize women that don't agree are abusing their sons.

>>82080889
>>82080941
never going to happen, people that resist these criticism of women refuse to think on their own about how true they are. They just scream incel and make personal attacks or appeal to an authority to police the speech. Cowards. Bunch of lying scheming sniveling hypocrites.

>>82080859
I'm sorry the fat hogs are all chad only. remember "fuck the patriarchy" ? they meant that literally.

All women are scumbags and won't ever admit to anything.

>>82080835
I get the feeling that resentanon is actually a woman.

>>82081700
What did I do though?

>>82081914
You're playing dumb.

>>82081885
Dude yeah, I said this a while back, but I think personally the paragraph (s)he writes about women are actually about men

>>82081920
No, people in 4chan related servers and threads always claim that I'm a bad person once they get an inkling of suspicion that I'm a woman. I'm just wondering what I did?

>>82080826 (OP)
Good morning anon keep the good work going

>>82080826 (OP)
Hello, Resent-anon. How was afternoon?

>>82081944
This is a stupid game. You're anonymous. No one knows you from anyone else, you could be, and most likely are, a man, you could be a pink dinosaur for all anyone on here knows. But if you're a woman you've certainly been unchairtiable discriminatory hateful and hypocritical to men as a group. You have been classless and cruel and careless and selfish. And the men on here will treat you such because they are being subjected to a particular wrong. A wrong in that they live in a society which proclaims equality, but that some people, mostly women but also sometimes a subset of elite men are in fact MORE equal than others. And they're a little bit dissatisfied with always being tricked abused belittled and constantly being given the run around that you didn't do anything.

So what did you do just in this thread, just in this bried moment we've met? You decided to make it about you. You've decided to make me do the work to justify myself to you about what you've done. When the truth is it's you who really need to be justifying yourself right now. And the fact that you haven't noticed it yet pisses me off.

>>82081927
I don't think so. But no serious man in 2025 would still expect women to just "do better" or to own up to anything, that's magical thinking and/or projection because he or she managed to be different. Seriously, when was the last time you heard a man even consider the idea that women can change? That's something you might have heard in the 2000 when things were too good for us to get stuck on the finer details , but it's not a male mindset anymore.

Still, I'm not going to diss resentanon because he or she is a generational poster and I'm an enjoyer, but some of the things he or she expects from women will simply never happen. They will never own up to their nature.

>>82081952
thank you anon, I hope you get to enjoy your popcorn man extra butter
>>82081993
I'm just anon, I don't go by a name and of the names people have used among my time here i've never been fond of that one in particular. My afternoon was alright, nothing interesting to report. I did read a book on the practical implementation of worker owned cooperatives.
>>82082035
>but it's not a male mindset anymore.
True men think very low of women right now. Right now men are seriously questioning if humanism applies to women, questioning if they can learn change or grow and make moral calculations on their own. And whilst you don't see it evident in a particularly bad batch of women at present there's nothing wrong with articulating the frustrations we have about what's wrong. I also think the jury is still out on the question. I'm under the impression that the women are most likely not genetically incapable of making moral judgments or improving, but that their circumstances right now are just too cushy and spoiled for them to experience and grow beyond their rotten thinking. I still leave them the possibility that in other circumstances they could be or could have grown to be better, fairer more moral people. Just because they fail in these circumstances doesn't mean they'd fail in all of them and there may be some underlying factors we aren't aware of. In a world where out institutions of objective empiricism have lied to the point of being obviously defunct, even skeptic empiricists lack the validity of the claims they once had. We have no data that plots out determines and limits what they CAN be, just experience and wisdom to show us what they are currently.

I think women need to own up to the fact that they haven't really done anything right by men and have done a lot of malicious intentional harm. To be clear: I don't mean they need to justify to men that they help men to: they do not. Any attempt to dissacoiate from malice or consequence of their actions or justify that they had any, even a minor positive effect on men is a lie and insincere. A healthy honest truthful dialogue, a productive conversation is IMPOSSIBLE until women admit what they did and admit that it was wrong.

>>82080826 (OP)
Best poster on this board. Don't ever stop, anon

>>82082033
>But if you're a woman you've certainly been unchairtiable discriminatory hateful and hypocritical to men as a group.
Yeah, I'm just asking for an example of what I did. Obviously it would be horrible to hate me and treat me like trash just because of what's between my legs, right? Just wondering what I did.
>You have been classless and cruel and careless and selfish.
Yeah, I just want an example. That's all.
>You decided to make it about you
No. If someone tells me that I'm a horrible person, am I not allowed ask why? Are you op? One time I kindly reached out in a thread, then someone told me that I'm a horrible person. I asked why? Then I was accused of making the thread about me. I'm not trying to do that... all I want to ask can be said with four words.

What did I do?

>>82082563
>I'm just asking for an example
>I just want an example.
>am I not allowed ask why?
>What did I do?
Well now you've actually doubled down on being an obnoxious and obtuse retard trying to make an assertion whilst pretending it's "just" a benign question. The answer to your question was actually valid but you've chosen to ignore that and have actually acted like an obnoxious subversive cunt just in this response alone which already clarifies that the criticism really does apply to you. I don't think you're as clever and justified as you think you are being right now. You overplayed when you attempted to continue pressing "I just want an example. That's all. " after pointing out that you'd already done something wrong in your first reply and you've actually doubled down on being awful and obnoxious in your second one. If you continue to ignore it I can only surmise you completely lack the capacity to self reflect which again is part of why you deserve the hate and is actually an example right there that you are ignoring despite my effort to point it out to you. I am in fact articulating the answer and you're so dead set on believing you have a "gotcha" that you've inadvertintely acted exactly like the obnoxious retard described in the op which refuses to own up to their mistakes. Something you should be willing to do on your own initiative, let alone when someone points them out to you like I am now and you still refuse to acknowledge what you've just heard or read. You are being a dumb bitch right now in this exact moment. Stop, take a deep breath and focus that single braincell of yours and see if you can recognize that you just made an error.

>>82082563
You're trying to take advantage of your anonymity to use it as a tabula rasa right now, innocent until proven guilty, but as you continue to talk on here you actually lose that little trick as you supply information about yourself. This is all of course pointless as a digression anyway, Women don't really believe stereotypes are wrong, they take advantage of stereotypes about men ALLL THE TIME. The idea that it's wrong for men to treat women as a group reflexively only makes sense when made from someone who isn't a hypocrite. But all women really are hypocrites about this and quite readily. At this point it seems strange for a woman to even make the case that assumptions about them because of their sex is wrong. I've never met a woman who didn't make numerous assumptions about any male she's in a room with based on him being a man, that he's dangerous or priveleged or incompetent with his emotions or predatory and women not only act on and talk readily about their discrimination between the sexes but also organize and socialize and cooperate against them often explicitly. I say this to point out that not only was your question answered, and not only did you ignore that answer proving that it was only ever a question made in bad faith where you'd assumed there could not actually be an answer, solely because of your anonymity, but when you were proven wrong you chose to ignore it. No, not only that: the very question you've posed is actually presumptuous. It is actually you who should start asking the questions about how you've acted and not anyone else's responsibiltiy to go to court over it so you can lawyer your way to innocence at this point. The crimes are so excessive and numerous and all you're really doing is trying to play epistomological games to get out of it.
>it would be horrible to hate me ... because of what's between my legs, right?
I don't think so, I think you treat men that way all the time and they are at most being reciprocal to you.

>>82082650
>ell now you've actually doubled down on being an obnoxious and obtuse retard trying to make an assertion whilst pretending it's "just" a benign question.
No, this is not the first time I've been told I'm a bad person by someone who doesn't even know me. On 4chan adjacent discords, people say the same thing once they get an inkling of suspicion that I'm a woman. Is it not okay for me to keep asking why? They never answer me, but it really bugs me and I wanna know.
>The answer to your question was actually valid but you've chosen to ignore that
Sorry, I didn't see it... all I read was people saying that all women are le evil. I'm just curious, what did I do?
> If you continue to ignore it I can only surmise you completely lack the capacity to self reflect which again is part of why you deserve the hate
I'm not trying to be smart, I just genuinely don't see people telling me what I did... even though you keep claiming they did. Could you just tell me again? I'm reading over the one posts, but I don't see anything.

>>82082724
>You're trying to take advantage of your anonymity to use it as a tabula rasa right now, innocent until proven guilty, but as you continue to talk on here you actually lose that little trick as you supply information about yourself.
I get why you think that, but no. You're mistaken.

You see, even on 4chan adjacent servers where I'm not anonymous, channers will still claim I'm a bad person.

You make a lot of assumptions, but I should only address one. As my answer to this will be the same as me answering the other ones
>I think you treat men that way all the time and they are at most being reciprocal to you
I don't treat men like that? When did I do that?

>>82082802
>I don't treat men like that? When did I do that?
I think you do treat men like that. Frankly all the women i've ever seen do in fact do so, and when you point it out to them the refuse to acknowledge it, just like you are doing right now. It's a huge problem with women: hypocrisy and it's made men feel that all women, when they proclaim "equality" between the sexes are actually just double dealing to commit sexism only in one direction all they want. It makes women come across as liars, egalitarian equality between the sexes ideals seem like opportunist hypocritical hogwash.
> I'm just curious, what did I do?
okay I'll explain it again:
here's the op:
>You're not getting better, you're not appreciating what you are being given or the men around you and it's pissing me off. Until you either own up to it or a hammer drops I don't think I like you.
So here's a criticism about women lacking moral initiative, self reflection responsibility for their own mistakes and appreciation for men and for the privileges women have. Now when you ask "what did I do?" or "give me an example" what you're doing is making a demand. You're demanding a stranger provide an example from a history between us that can't exist because you are anonymous. This is an epistomological contradiction. You've likely done something, but because you are behind a veil along a screen no one here has the receipts to give you one. You're claiming to be genuinely asking that seemingly nonsensical question, when more commonly that's what someone would say just to make a stupid "gotcha". It doesn't mean you didn't actually act nice to men all your life, you're just anonymous so no one can tell who you are when you ask for a past event there's no name and no history, that's what it means to be anonymous. It is a contradictory question even a newfag would notice on here.

>>82082874
>I think you do treat men like that
How come? Like, what exactly did I do that you didn't like.
>and when you point it out to them the refuse to acknowledge it, just like you are doing right now.
Huh? I'm not denying you were mistreated by women or anything. Don't worry, anon.
I'm just wondering what I myself did?
>You're demanding a stranger provide an example from a history between us that can't exist because you are anonymous.
Then they shouldn't claim I'm a horrible person if I've done nothing to them?
You can complain about the women in your life, how awful they are, etc. No problem with that.

The problem is when you tell people that you haven't even met that they're horrible people just because of what's between their legs. I'm sure you wouldn't want women to treat you like that... so why is it okay when you do it?

I'm not even denying OPs claims that he has been mistreated. But when someone treats me like a horrible person, I'm entitled to ask. You are too, anon.

>>82082786
>>82082802
>>82082874
So to clarify, instead of listening to the criticism and making a serious effort to self reflect or recognize the possibility that you have this tendency and to be more mindful of your bad habits going forward you've posited on this thread a nonsensical question. No, not just a nonsensical question but actually a nonsensical demand. A demand that these anonymous men with no idea which woman you are lay out a a prosecution case against you, so that you may protest your innocence from behind the veil of anonymity instead of simply bashfully admitting you, like the many many women among you have been having your cake and eating it too and being very VERY mean about it and resolving to do better. In doing this, you've actually fallen into the criticism of the op which is that you are not acknowledging your own bad behavior or the behavior of other women and are still trying to protest innocence when everyone patently sees that women are committing this bad behavior not just in large numbers but to such an extent and in such a majority that everyone is skeptical of the idea that you'd be an exception, and STILL, you think it's actually someone else's job to keep making this case. No one wants to keep making the case. Everyone's past the point of debating it. Women really are awful literally all the fucking time to the point where an exception feels like a MIRACLE. And refusing to acknowledge it feels not just delusional but like a malevolent delusion. One enforced on all of us typically from people in position of authority and moral condemnation.

>>82082903
Someone tells me that I'm a bad person, I ask why, they don't tell. I'm fine with reflecting, but what did I do? I'm just curious lol.

Like, imagine if I made a post about how I hate the men who have mistreated me in my life. If an anon said, as this one did, "all men are bad, this includes you", wouldn't you think you're entitled to ask what you did?

>>82082916
You have cooties and only like the boys who can run the fastest in P.E

>>82082928
T-that's not true!! I'm... I'm actually... *gulp*
I'm actually a fatty myself, I run super slow *cries*

>>82082901
>Then they shouldn't claim I'm a horrible person if I've done nothing to them?
Why not? Do you think it's normal of a behavior? Which social contract do you ascribe to that demands people not assume you're awful because of your gender? As far as I can see there's no credible ideology that practices this belief. Feminists PRETENDED to do so but actually still continued and actually encouraged the behavior in women and institutions and the problem is both larger and more onesided.
>>82082916
Oh i don't need to imagine anon, You're still ignoring the criticisms made about your behavior in this thread actually though, which is again a valid answer to your question. in this thread, in your question you've actually committed a fault by making an insincere and dismissive gesture, but it sounds like you're committed to not acknowledging that.

>wouldn't you think you're entitled to ask what you did?
Oh i think many do all the time every day multiple times a day, actually i think a better question now is why you would feel that this line of reasoning actually would even abdicate you from blame. We live in a world where blaming men for their sex is not just casual and normal but notionally validated and encouraged. Why would you ask men not to engage in this kind of behavior when you've evidently failed to make this argument apparent to the many swaths of women who not only commit the act often, so fucking often, that it's convincing men to reciprocate the behavior, albeit much less so than ALL WOMEN do? I would be skeptical that you even really believe in this stuff if all your effort here wasn't to stop women from doing this every time they look at a man on a sidewalk. Why come here to prosletyze your innocence to men, when it's women committing the crime in bulk and making men feel like upholding the onesided demand is unfair and not worth it? There's a second thing you did wrong in this thread. There you go, twice the rewards for your question.

>>82082954
>Why not?
You mean... why shouldn't we hate every single member of a particular sex? I think that's incredibly unfair. Like, surely you're not okay with women calling all men rapists or something?
I would never do that to a man, hence why I think it's wrong and unfair.
>You're still ignoring the criticisms made about your behavior in this thread actually though, which is again a valid answer to your question.
Oh, I see. You seem to have seen it... can you tell me what they said I did? I just wanna know, it's confusing obv.
>Why come here to prosletyze your innocence to men, when it's women committing the crime in bulk and making men feel like upholding the onesided demand is unfair and not worth it? There's a second thing you did wrong in this thread. There you go, twice the rewards for your question.
What? No, I'm only asking what I did wrong because I think it's okay for people to do that when someone tells them they're horrible. Do you not?

Just in case the reason people can't answer is because they're unsure what I'm talking about, I've attached the post that I'm questioning in picrel.

Like, it's okay to think you've been mistreated by women and all that, I'm just wondering.
>all women are scumbags
What did I do?

>>82082916
>Like, imagine if I made a post about how I hate the men who have mistreated me in my life. If an anon said, as this one did, "all men are bad, this includes you", wouldn't you think you're entitled to ask what you did?
I would not feel entitled, men are too entitled remember? You don't understand the male experience maybe but actually yes this is a rule of life, some woman feels wronged or threatened by a man of some kind and I actually do have to suffer the prejudice for it and I am told that this is justice and right and that I'm not allowed to complain about it, and this is actually the socially acceptable public politically correct opinion to have and protests to the contrary do in fact get you labeled as an incel or a misogynist and I may be treated unkindly or actually punished and policed for disagreeing with it. Not only that, the justifications can be far less than abuse to actually something petty, further the abuse doesn't even need to happen to you, it could just happen to your friend. Actually the abuse doesn't need to happen you just need to be scared and have anxiety about males for it to be justified even if they've never done anything wrong to you or anyone you know. That's actually how all men live today, on top of other very unfair things. The question is whether that hypocrisy will be ironed out or whether we should just allow men to make the same kind of gendered assumptions women still make not just regularly but constantly and to a deleterious imperious discriminatory and abjectly cruel extent.

>>82082985
>men are too entitled remember?
What? I think that's really wrong to say. Why do you think that? Or are you trying to say that I think that?
... when did I say that?

Anyone, I get that you're unhappy with how you believe men are treated in society, I'm sorry for that. Don't think I'm dismissing that... but when someone tells me personally that I'm a bad person, I have to ask: what did I do? I'm just curious.

>>82082966
>Like, surely you're not okay with women calling all men rapists or something?
And yet I live under and am quite forcefully demanded to put up with it by all authorities and all media. If you think that's wrong, then protesting that injustice should take up more of your time than questioning these threads.
>I would never do that to a man,
I don't believe that.
>hence why I think it's wrong and unfair.
and yet that unfairness is verry widespread and thoroughly enforced. Do you find it surprising that men would not consider just -playing by the same rules they live under? honestly this is something women should have been worrying about and listening about maybe 15 years ago, but here we are, and to ask any man not to have a bad opinion of women as a sex sounds honestly laughably presumptuous and hypocritical at this point. there isn't a social contract that justifies that entitlement. Women are double dealing too hard, the trust isn't there and if we can't admit that women fucked it up we can't trust there's any level of sincerity in the discussion.

>>82083008
>And yet I live under and am quite forcefully demanded to put up with it by all authorities and all media. If you think that's wrong, then protesting that injustice should take up more of your time than questioning these threads.
I'm not sure what this means in relation to what I was asking? Obviously you don't think we should treat all men like the same person, like they're a rapist, right?
>I don't believe that.
Oh, I see. What did I do? Obviously you wouldn't just assume that I'm a horrible person because of what's between my legs... that's horrible, just think of people who do that to men. It needs to stop.


Anyway, in order to not let things derail and go on forever, I'm most just wondering about this:
>all women are scumbags
I'm just wondering what I did?

>>82083008
>If you think that's wrong, then protesting that injustice should take up more of your time than questioning these threads.
Oh, wait. Sorry, I get what you're trying to say now.

You see, just because there are women who mistreat men, that doesn't mean I'm not allowed ask someone why they think I'm a horrible person when they personally tell me that I am.

>>82083005
>I have to ask: what did I do? I'm just curious.
you're not just curious to be honest, you're just making an assertion. I've given you two answers to your question and you're still ignoring them which is literally a criticism made in the op which means the criticism is actually predictive and validates the point in the original post about women not reflecting or owning up to what they've done wrong. I think everyone is very sensitive to feminists trying to shove all this toxic masculinity manhating agenda under the rug and pretend it was all technology or social media when there's literally generations of male lives lost or damaged because of a feminist movement that genuinely malicious and opportunist and full of hypocrisies that supported an elitist moralist censorious culture and supported an elite class that have done serious financial harm to the middle and lower class. That any man who made a valid criticism of women is an extremist or an incel and now we're all pretending it was secretly some bald euro faggot selling pickup courses. Well if that didn't happen then what you're really asserting is that I didn't actually live the way i did and the experiences i had aren't real, and also the others who i've met aren't either. I basically don't exist. and all the wrongs done to me don't need to be apologized for, none of the pain needs to be remanded or ameliorated and that the status quo is actually swell. No, i won't accept it. I will not accept protests of innocence. I will accept apologies, sympathies and a genuine effort to change from women into a more moral, compassionate appreciative person and nothing less. I don't want arguments, i don't want backtalk I want an apology and better behavior, and even in this thread I'm reminded that i'm part of a dwindling coalition of holdouts and many other men have given up hope on you ever making the correct choice. Each day, my argument to the contrary becomes less convincing.

>>82083072
>You see, just because there are women who mistreat men, that doesn't mean I'm not allowed ask someone why they think I'm a horrible person when they personally tell me that I am.
You're still being retarded about this? just accept the two answers you were given and move on. You are making a retarded gotcha and it doesn't work. Give it up.

>>82083094
>you're not just curious to be honest, you're just making an assertion.
No, I'm not trying to. This just isn't the first time that someone has accused me of being a horrible person for the first time without having ever talked to me, so I'm just genuinely always trying to figure out what I did?
So again, what did I do?
> I've given you two answers to your question and you're still ignoring them which is literally a criticism made in the op
I'm so sorry, I just genuinely can't see it. Maybe it's cause I'm tired and I'm missing parts of your post.
If you're okay with it, could I please just ask you to simply state the things I've done in life prior to interacting with this post >>82081700 that justified me being a called a "scumbag"?

If you're okay with doing that, thank you. I'm sorry if I frustrated you. I try my best to be kind.

>>82083122
Sorry, if I received two answers, I genuinely just missed them. I thought people were just venting out their grievances with the women in their life, I missed any text that suggested they were criticising my own personal actions towards men.

Maybe I'm just missing parts of people's big posts because I am sleep deprived (it's 8am and I haven't slept)
If it's okay to ask, could you please just tell me the things I did prior to anons post >>82081700 that warranted me being called a scumbag?

If you're okay with doing that, thank you. I'm not trying to frustrate. As I said earlier, I try my best to be kind.

>>82083133
If various people you've never met, from various servers, determine you're a female and then go on to describe you as a bad person, then it's probably because of behavior. However, you and I both know that's not the reason why you're engaging with anon, and it's instead because you recognize yourself in his complaints and feel a need to defend yoirself. I would go on further to say that you dislike anon's premise specifically because it is female in nature, which is geberalized, but reflected back onto you individually, in that it makes broad conclusions about entire groups of people based on stereotypes alone, which is itself part of his point: women are generally nasty, presumptious, cruel, and exlusionary when it comes to men as a rule of thumb, and so when he applies the same standard of behavior to you that women apppy to men in general, you individually try to appeal to a presumption of innocence/benefit of the doubt, which women will NEVER give to men, and you do it because you exoect to receive it merely because you're a woman.

That is to say, because he has used the same arguments to attempt to defend himself without any purchase or sympathy from females in general, his position is that if he is going to be punished individually for the acts of the collective that he's a part of, then you had better get used to being treated the same way. Turn about is fair play, and until you start having these discussions with other women instead of men, you're going to be treated, as an individual, in the same way that your group, as a collective, treats him, by him.

>>82083363
Furthermore, I would say that your subversive, insincere style of argumentation in this thread alone marks you as probably being a bad person, male or female. You're not engaging with his primary points, respomding to his assertions, or actually addressing his arguments; instead, you're arguing semantics and refusing to actually give any context around your interactions with these other people which you, hidimg behind "inquiry" (again in typical female behavior), bundle together and lay at his feet, and blame him for, without providing any circumstantial context to inform his answer. Frankly, that he chooses to engage with your obviously insincere missives is a testament to his virtues.


Again, the "I try to be kind" and so on nonsense is, to any casual observer, obviously paddimg and emotional manipulation to make you appear to be innocuous when you're cleary trying to be subversive and manipulative. Men are over it and these "soft power" aproaches won't work on us any more.

>>82083363
>then it's probably because of behavior.
Of course... but that's not the case. I'd understand why that would usually be the case, but in these specific instances, they were 4chan servers.
I read both your latest posts, but I still don't get exactly what I did....

>>82083384
> Frankly, that he chooses to engage with your obviously insincere missives is a testament to his virtues.
Arguing online isn't a testament to anyone's virtues... it doesn't matter if you think I'm insufferable for reasons you do not care to share(?) People argue online with people they hate all the time lol.
Anyway, you claim I'm insincere a lot. But the 4 words I keep repeating are very sincere, I promise. On a surface level AND a deeper level, I am just curious what I did previously in my life to be warranted a scumbag? Would you be okay with just plainly telling me what I did prior to >>82081700 anons post to warrant being called that?

>>82083363
>his position is that if he is going to be punished individually for the acts of the collective that he's a part of, then you had better get used to being treated the same way.
But I don't treat men as a collective, I never have... I ask you when I have ever done such a thing, but you don't seem to answer?
Isn't it best for both sexes to just not treat eachother badly. I wouldn't care if male crime rates went up even higher, I still would never assume a guy I was talking to was a rapist or something because the world just isn't that black and white.
The anon claimed I'm a bad person, so I'm just asking the question: what did I do?

>>82080826 (OP)
I think I get what you mean, I just finished playing a game with a girl that im almost 100 percent sure she was a 4chan user. And she was the most bat shit, self interested retard i have ever had the displeasure of hearing for the entire mission. If these are the girls you people desperately want I dont know what else to say.

>>82080826 (OP)
Hey, anon. I'm sorry about what's happened to you... you didn't talk about it much in this thread, but I know you've been mistreated by a lot of women in your life (if I'm remembering right) based off the other threads.

Anyway, if I can ask. Who exactly are these posts addressed to? Or is it just a vent?