Thread 82101718

men with perfectly normal healthy penises be like
>waaah im only 4-6 inches waaaah im never gonna please a woman waaaaah
get over yourself and purge the porn sickness out of your brain

Lumping in 4 inches with 6 is insane. That's like saying a 4 foot tall guy is the same as a 6 foot tall guy.

>>82101718 (OP)
my peen is perfectly juicy and ready for combat, still pornbrained doe gotta get this cum out some how

The point is breaching the fornix to get the most sensitive nerves deep inside. mid-dicks hit the cervix at 6 inches and think that's as deep as it goes when the true orgasm-inducing pleasure starts around 7 or 8.

>>82101796
this is what happens when you replace anatomy class with doujins

>>82101718 (OP)
idk man, women getting used to 8+ inches with the toys they use chronically

>>82101718 (OP)
the brain size meme is funny because 6.5 is literally top >5% of dicks but apparently and men are told thats considered small

>>82101718 (OP)
based. imagine ever caring what a woman has to say / thinks.

>be a great man of history.
milton friedman probably had a 2 incher. it's inconsequential. your calling in life transcends this.

>>82101840
This argument is meaningless. Big and small are determined by the size, not the rarity.

>>82101885
anon...
what is the baseline for you to make the comparison? the universal average.
i.e comparative size is a distribution (with rarity / percentiles).

>>82101718 (OP)
Honestly, yeah. My 6.3" incher is fine with being able to impregnate a cute girl anyways.

>>82101925
From a woman's perspective, it's not a comparison. She wants a dick that is big enough to make herself feel good, not a dick that is statistically bigger compared to other men that she isn't having sex with in the first place.

>>82101963
if dick size perfectly correlates with how good sex feels for a woman. and that it is never displeasurable. then there is a rarity associated with dick size.

idk man. i guess you're right considering >from a woman's perspective = the most profound mental retardation imaginable

>>82101822
You don't need a peer reviewed study, simply ask any woman if she would rather have a man with a 4 or 8 inch penis. The proof is in the pudding.

>>82102098
the average woman would take the 4 inches
>8 inches
most women are not taking 8 inches in them, most don't even take 6, sex has to be more meticulous, also not as fun for the man
>4
most women will be able to take all of it, sex is worry free, don't even have to think about it

>>82101738
>>82102130
Tfw dick demoralizing spam actually gives you life fuel since the majority on here are smaller than u.

>>82102130
You are out of touch with what women think.

>>82101718 (OP)
This except:
>men with perfectly normal healthy looks be like
>WAAH I'M SO UGLY WAAH I'M NEVER GONNA PLEASE A WOMAN WAAAH
>men with perfectly normal healthy brains be like
>WAAH I'M SO AUTISTIC WAAH I'M NEVER GONNA PLEASE A WOMAN WAAAH