being antinatalist doesn't make you anti-life or anti-improving-the-lives-of-the-8-billion-already-alive

Why is antinatalsim overwhelmingly promoted in historically white nation states?

>>82114412
white people are the only ones smart and kind enough to accept its tenants of reducing suffering

>>82114408 (OP)
Every open antinatalist I have encountered has been a raging faggot.

>>82114415
Leaving the world to niggers, chinks Indians and kikes instead. Just a cohencidence.

You won't be buried. The vultures will eat you as we leave your fucking body in the hot sun.

>>82114415
If all white people became antinatalist, then there would be no antinatalists left lol, literally a suicidal ideology not just for believers but for the belief itself.

>>82114425
so you'd rather force people to breed for a race they're going to lose? wouldn't that just cause more suffering? why not just let them take over and they can see how their society goes?

>>82114432
Didn't read. Also you never answered my original question, kike. Not surprised.

>>82114428
Yes, the whole purpose is to not reproduce when you know it is going to cause suffering. There is nothing wrong with being anti-natalist whilst you can be, and as I've already said, there's way too many people anyway

>>82114438
Again, I don't think it's "overly promoted" as much as people who have access to higher education opportunities realize that there isn't a need or want for bringing children into the world. Anti-natalism should be practiced everywhere

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lysbetpfP0

The problem with jews is religious and between them and christians mainly.

>>82114408 (OP)
>anti-improving-the-lives-of-the-8-billion-already-alive
Yes, I'm sure reducing the high IQ white/asian population is going to greatly improve the lives of the 8 billion already alive.
>anti-life
You literally want human extinction, being pro-life isn't defined as "well I don't want to KILL all humans RIGHT NOW"

>>82114519
Wanting to not participate in birthing children into a dying world doesn't mean I want extinction, it just means I don't want to prolong the suffering

>>82114408 (OP)
I hate the fact that I can't be antinatalist without liberals telling me I hate the poor, or I hate the disabled. I AM the poor and disabled. I don't WANT anyone else to have to live this life. I'm not saying make life worse for people I'm saying make less people so life doesn't get worse
We can kill the oligarchs and create fully sustainable green living, but there's still going to be billions of impulsive, abusive parents who only have kids cause the condom broke, it's expected of them, or they're delusional enough to care about "legacy". Even under utopian conditions, the human population can't quadruple every hundred years and be expected to remain sustainable.
The medical field is dying. We need armies of ground floor medical workers, but each needs so many qualifications and it's such a low paying job. We need to orientate our society to end of life care.

I'm not necessarily strict 100% antinatalist, but most people shouldn't have kids. The average person has kids with very little consideration and ends up fucking them up. It should be considered a huge personal choice only undertaken if you have ample resources to provide a good life for them and are willing to sacrifice your own happiness for theirs. We should also use the most advanced embryo selection or gene-editing technology available to select for advantageous traits.