>>82125832 (OP)
>She's too fat.
Not a problem, unless she has no intention on correcting her weight. If she WANTS to be fat, or specifically calls it literally anything else, it's a problem. Plus, child-rearing if you want that is exceptionally risky.
>She's a single mom.
She had a man, and gave her most prized self to him. Why are they separate now? Either she was a shitty person, or she made rash and shitty decisions in 90% of cases. And someone with poor decision-making skills doesn't make for a good partner.
>She's trans.
No child rearing capabilities if that's your goal, plus also the fact they tend to come with a shit-ton of extra emotional baggage.
>She's poly.
She doesn't love you. She only wants your attention, and maybe your dick for a while. When you perform less, or she starts seeing someone else, you're gone. Plus, high STD risk, and you'd NEVER want to have a child in that household.
>She lives in another country.
Is she willing to move here? Is her home country a decent place to be? Are there any transferable or easily-attainable good or better jobs where she is compared to where you live? If any of these are a 'yes', it's fine. But in most cases, it's not.
>She's had too many sexual partners.
Combination of poly and single mom. Horrible decision-making and instant gratification seeking mindset that makes her unstable, and unable to commit. She'd cheat one day or another, and blame you for it, instead of her own choices.
>She's too tall.
This one is a farce. I'd love a tall woman.
>She's a feminist.
Feminists in the 70s and 80s were... mostly okay. 'Feminists' now is just codeword for extreme misandrist; and I'd rather not be in a relationship where I'm seen as the mistake or bad guy by default in every situation.
(...cont.)
