Thread 82128540

Caring about a woman's "body count" is weird and there's absolutely no reason for it. Men can never give even a single reason to care about it.

>>82128540 (OP)
Its disgusting and unsanitary to stick your dick where another dick has been. Simple as.

>>82128544
Vaginas are self cleaning it isn't dirty.

>>82128540 (OP)
premarital sex is adultery

>>82128540 (OP)
how am i supposed to relate to someone who has had so much sex love and attention in life when ive had so little?

>>82128710
Would you eat from I bowl someone took a steaming diarrhea shit in even if they told you they washed and disinfected it?

>>82128736
Real reason and why you can always identify the people that do care as massive lonely loser virgins.

Sexhavers think sluts are hot. These are facts.

>>82128736
This is my issue aswell, they have made their own bed by not having sex with me when i was younger and let me get bodycounts.

>>82128746
Is that what you equate penis to? Shit?

>>82128540 (OP)
No thank you. No matter what you say, no matter how much you nag me and mock me and call me a virgin, I will never, ever, EVER accept a woman who is not a kissless virgin. That is the absolute minimum that I am entitled to as a man of extraordinary high value (tm).

>>82128897
If its not mine 100% yes. But thats not the point. Would you?

>>82128540 (OP)
its like how most chicks looking for a long term relationship probably dont want to be with a player who fucks around, someone whos been all around the block is probably not someone who can sustain a long term relationship. i dont think its wrong to have that as a preference. people have all sorts of preferences about things like height, weight, race, economic status, religion, personal beliefs, tattoos and piercings etc. its not just an incel man thing either it goes both ways, there are women with this standard.

>>82128540 (OP)
me glancing at this thread, having had neither a gf or a ONS

Agreed OP, these incels don't know a thing.

>>82128540 (OP)
Signals objectifying behavior.

Objectifying behavior signifies low morale, prone to using people more specifically as objects as a means to an end rather than harboring long-term meaningful connections.

Also, a potential indicator of hedonism.

These are valid red flags for people under certain value-sets for the type of relationship they want to hold.

It's absolute brainrot to not acknowledge this.

You're not "required" to meet every individual's value-set, just as you're not required to be ethical. I would prefer for people to be ethical when in pursuit of things, but Earth is Earth.

You can be a hoe. That's fine. Being a hoe and expecting someone to accept you when it's a deal-breaker for them? Stupid. Thinking there are no valid reasons for such a deal-breaker? Also stupid.

Non virgin women are worthless. And guys that go around ruining women for other men need to be publicly executed

>>82128929
Sir, that is a 13 year old

>>82128540 (OP)
Scientifically proven to lower a woman's mate bonding ability

>>82128798
Most people in history are cooler than all the degenerate sexhavers around now and they all thought sluts were lame

>>82128540 (OP)
its like this

women with a high body count arent capable of love

so when they have kids, the emotional bound will never be there

to them, their kids just exist

and whatever happens to them is the least of their concern

I dont mind xddd

>>82128540 (OP)
I used to care about this until I took some girls virginities. Now I'm fucking someone's wife with great enthusiasm. People only care about this if they're "behind" with their own bodycount since having a low bodycount represents an implicit rejection by society. It's sour grapes and nothing else since we're human beings and not princes and princesses from a fairy tale; these ideals are impractical and unrealistic.

>>82128540 (OP)
sauce? is it even the same girl?

>>82130889
nice fantasy you tranny