>>82137936 (OP)
The last Harry Potter book came out in 2007 and she hasn't produced a single thing people care about since. You know she's written other novels since, but no one cares about them. She's a crust old bitch who wrote some mediocre kids books decades ago.
I don't get it. Why are you making threads about topic that are now 10 years past their peak and dated as fuck. You got to be able to make better threads than this.
>>82137936 (OP)
For what? You think this is going to be some hilarious own but most people don't read that hags-been's tweets and nobody's going to get the reference, they'll all just think you're a creepy incel, this is like calling women 'holes' or 'female'.
>>82137998 >Why are you making threads about topic that are now 10 years
Trannies aren't 10 years past their peak. They're at their peak now since literally every rightoid culture warrior is obsessed with trannies and can't stop thinking about them.
>>82137987
HP is one of the most culturally influential novel series ever, dude, not just in the West but all over the world. Over 600 million copies sold. You don't need to cope so hard because she's against you disgusting troons.
>>82138092
No ovaries no female, sorry. Doesn't matter why. No equipment = you're a man = you're a tranny if you still say you're female when you don't have any equipment. Sorry. I don't make the rules, J.K. Rowling does.