>>82144943There's nothing to refute, I sought inquiry but I see you'd rather pretend to know things under the guise of the lack of knowledge you know others also have on the things you invoke. You can explain what you meant to me, and meat me in the middle, while also absolving my claim that it sounded like gobbledeegook and enlighten me (something you should be able to do) but I'm sure you'd rather engage with me in a back and forth series turd flinging or something. I also fully confess to being retarded, but there's nothing of substance in saying that, outside of a declaration of humility and that I might be wrong about something.
>this is the real world where we discuss THEORY.Something you did not do in this thread.
Gobbledeegook, and I say that because you have done no such thing here, going back to what I said previously. You are just invoking these things and calling it a day. Pretending to have knowledge about things under the mere invocation of them, but I digress, I don't want to get sidetracked.