Redditors said the Chad harem narrative is incel bullshit but chat gpt is giving me cited, empirical data from a reputable source that corroborates the narrative? Is AI sexist or something? Is the data sexist?

>>82146851 (OP)
>but chat gpt is giving me
Brown

There are no citations in that pic, AI never cites their slop for good reason

>>82146851 (OP)
>the idiot machine that tells me everything I want to hear told me the things I wanted to hear
lol zoomies ngmi

chatgpt makes citations up when it does include them, they're called "hallucinations"

>>82146858
>>82146867
>>82146908

Can you guys stop coping for one second? If you explicitly ask for reputable sources it will give them to you.

>>82146937
did you check the reputable sources to make sure they 1) actually exist, and 2) say what it claims?
If so, post them instead it's way less embarrassing than citing ChatGPT

>>82146956
Yes dumbass. I'm a software developer and I have AI do 90% of my job for me, Im well aware of its limitations and proclivities for hallucination.

https://ifstudies.org/blog/sexless-america-young-adults-are-having-less-sex

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n.htm

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2023-08-03/young-adults-less-sex-gen-z-millennials-generations-parents-grandparents

>>82146851 (OP)
The top 5% of men had a little over 25% of all the sex in 2002 in America. Considering the rise of dating apps and other factors, the harem factor is probably even stronger today.

>>82146986
Look over to the right btw, 92% of all sex was had by the upper 50%. People talk about the rise of the male virgin as a civilization-destroying fact, but that gets it wrong. The only thing that changed is that in the past awkward dudes got a single pity fuck and a couple blowjobs in college. Now they get zero. In all of history, Chad does most of the fucking.

>>82146997
I wish Chad would fuck my ass (no homo)

>>82146997
>In all of history, Chad does most of the fucking.
why do you think every religion has been laser focused on keeping the behavior of women under control?

there is NOTHING new under the sun.

>>82147010
>the behavior of women
That's a cope, Chad will never side with you just because you blame women for him fucking them all consensually.

>>82146986
>tfw I'm some college gigachad

>>82146983
>The fact that sexlessness is rising faster for men than for women could seem to imply that a small group of men are having sex with many women. This isnt the case.

>>82147015
calm down roastie. your lies and seething aren't going to change anyone's mind

>>82147030
I am not a woman but gay do you know how good chads cock tastes like?

>>82147024
what's the explanation then, female bisexuality?

>>82147120
>what's the explanation then
Women fucking their dogs as always

>>82147120
read your own sources.

>>82147030
He's right you know, the men doing good now won't do shit to get you some.

>>82146997
>Now they get zero. In all of history, Chad does most of the fucking.
This isn't how enforced monogamy works.

>>82147189
Enforced monogamy has likely always been a meme at least in Europe. Maybe in the Arab world it's different, but peasants in medieval Europe were fucking left and right to pass the time, and it's almost guaranteed that Chadeasant was getting most of that peasant girl pussy.

>>82147296
>tell me you're brown without telling me you're brown
Pathetic

>>82147296
This is not how it works in enforced monogamy, Chud.
Male guardians were hovering behind every girl's shoulder either father or husband. You aren't getting easy access to girls pussy around him.

>Maybe in the Arab world it's different,
Yeah it was different, Arabs had literal harems because of the Islam.

How old are you, OP? This is something everyone (except autists like you) has always known since forever. What you are doing is nothing new. All you have to do is observe society from the outside of your bedroom.

>redditors
You might want to get outside more often instead of listen to people online who are chronically online.

>>82146851 (OP)
redditors are normalnigger bluepills under the control of a plaga in their brain and an astral vampire sucking out their soul and are defacto hostile to people such as you and i, reinforcing their status quo bubble and maliciously gaslighting anyone who notices and points out the obvious contradictions and hypocrisies. i know you probably made this thread to bait discussion or strengthen a viewpoint if you did so in good faith but it's worth noting that nothing a normgroid reddit nigger says is worth consideration, ever, and a lot of these people are aware of the true nature of females but will lie to your face about it anyway because it's a form of aggression and a way to cause harm to people they hate, ie non simps, people outside their sphere of control, mad lads, etc.

I don't need a study to tell me what is intuitively. Higher "value" males will have more partners across their lifetime than a sub5 incel kek. WOmen aren't fucking the incel.

>>82146956
LLMs don't make up statistics anymore, hallucinations are in the sub 1% range. Small mistakes and misinterpretations are still possible but it's not like it was last year.

>>82147445
>WOmen aren't fucking the incel
I'm an incel with a body count of 8 how do you explain that?

>>82146986
>percentage of sex acts
>gets lower as education gets higher
>gets lower as income gets higher
jobmaxxers... is it over?

>>82147458
>body count of 8
You aren't incel by definition then.
>>82147024
>Rise in male sexlessness is caused by decline in monogamy with 1 partner
>A graph on male sex
Show the graph on women sex now. What a dishonest article.

>>82147475
But i am an incel even my gf says that

>>82147475
Your own sources disproved your shitty claim, you have nothing.

>>82147591
I'm not OP. That study attributes the driver behind male sexlessness being a decrease in monogamy. It never discusses the motivations behind the decrease. Why? Hypergamy. Why should women jump into dating average males and sub 5s when they can hold out for higher valued males. It's the perceived ability of these small group of men that motivates a decrease in monogamy (at least one). Irrelevant study. The claim remains

>>82147779
>perceived ability
meant perceived availability

>>82147797
That's just false, many women have decided to forgo children. So why marry at all then?

>>82147854
Forgo marriage because they realized they can just have fun with chads and their friends. No need really for average males (maybe occasionally fun when Chad isn't there), or when aging happens and you get scared.

>>82146851 (OP)
>giving me cited
So where are the citations?

>>82146851 (OP)
It's interesting for it to say something so controversal.

>>82146937
No, it makes up the resources. If you actu google them you may discover that they don't exist at all, or are about completely different thing.

>>82147296
Why are you lying so much? What is this modern fixation of denying that we had gender relations on lock when we completely restricted women? A few days ago i was out with some friends and the topic of women came up, how we approach women but all of us are either single for a long time or virgins. Then we started talking about how our grandparents did it. And basically everyone had the same story - their grandpa was in his late 20s and grandma in her early-mid teens (one guy's grandpa married a 17 year old whom he met when she was 14 and he 22). And they literally walked up to them and said "you, should marry me" and the grandmas said yes. When asked why, they would say "he is from a good family". And they asked them to marry not after some humiliation ritual dating bullshit, no. They asked for marriage within 1 day of meetimg them. 0 divorces, 3+ children, 60 year long stable marriages. Women who had sex before marriage were treated as whores, women who weren't married by their 20s were considered hags and spinsters. And this is early 1900s in austria-hungary, not some gypsy backwater.

>>82148378
Sorry, chad is too busy slinging dick to think about such things.

>>82147469
Always has been. Careers are a form of consensual slavery, a guided tour through life. If you want to sexmaxx, you have to go at it on your own.

>>82148378
Your grandparents did not have strictly enforced monogamy. One of my great-grandmothers was a flapper girl who only settled down late, for example. Was being a slut shamed, yes absolutely, but the lack of it is only a direct cause for a small percentage of modern male virgins.
>And this is early 1900s in austria-hungary, not some gypsy backwater.
Well maybe it's been different there, I'm referring to being an American

>>82148428
O yeah, americans have been famously known as degenerates for as long as they existed in Europe. My great grandafther, whenever he heard America get mentioned, would just scoff and call them all lazy, of loose morals, and that they live with BLACKS.

>>82148378
Cool story fag. Unless you and your friends are several hundred years old your granddads didn't just go up to a teenage girl and say "You should marry me" and get married the next day. Why do you retards like you try to prove a point by making up obvious bullshit? My granddad was born in 1903 and even he dated girls before he met my grandmother. You can read P.G. Wodehouse stories from the 1920s where the characters are dating. For fuck's sake, in Shakespeare's play Romeo and Juliet, Romeo meets Juliet when he's on the rebound from some other girlfriend dumping him, and that play was written over four hundred years ago!

>>82148547
Retard, the point was that there was pressure to marry and now there is none.

>>82146851 (OP)
Reddit is made up of ugly feminists, effeminate males and trannies. They will never admit anything which goes against the feminist tranny agenda.

ChatGPT will admit that this harem phenomenon exists and then argue it is not womens fault endlessly. Even ChatGPT thinks women have no responsibility or culpability. Try it out yourself.

Essentially women have more choice now to not have sex, work alone, or work single AND screw around. Thats why the Gen z TikToks of women dancing at work are infuriating.

They took mens place at school.
They took our jobs for less money
They stay "single" and they used social media to network with other competitive women. Then they fuck the same guy that is approved. Or they screw tons of gypsies and dont tell nobody.

Its fucking gross. They spill the beans to their girlfriends about every detail because its a fucking social game. There is no love in this phenomenon. It is demoralization.

>>82148851
Admit it women are simply better at being men

>>82146851 (OP)
I find the timing of these threads strange

>>82146851 (OP)
Welcome to the red pill.

>>82146983
>I'm a software developer and I have AI do 90% of my job for me
i'm sorry if AI can do 90% of your job lol
>Im well aware of its limitations and proclivities for hallucination.
no u

>>82148378
>>82148547
>>82148586
The "pressure" for about 80s years, was "oops babies" people fuck a lot, and back in your 1920s example birth control that was effective was as rare as hen's teeth and most young kids have few distractions so bumping uglies was all you had for hormone fueled teens and when those kids started popping out the Daughter's dad made sure as hell that guy stayed around, it's why the term "shotgun wedding" is so well know for how common this is.

You can even chart this with birth and marriage data gathered in the 1930s onward. 70% of Marriges had a child born in less than 6 months after the marriage papers. ie 3/4ths of all humans were fucking hard and the remaining 1/4th would panic settle to not be alone. We mastered birth control and keeping people distracted and this is the result: half of men and women between the ages of 24 and 40 are single and without child.

This is most of modern problems by the way, we solve for something that we saw as a bug when it was the feature of our existence.

>>82148378
Exactly. My country (italy) didn't even legalize divorces until the 1970s. Before the 1970s it was very common to rape a girl if you wanted to marry her (because this would force her to marry you even if her parents did not approve of the union)

>>82148378
>austria-hungary
>not some gypsy backwater

>>82148378
>0 divorces, 3+ children, 60 year long stable marriages.
This lasts for 2-3 generations at best before women breach containment and you are forced to start conceding pieces of the system, all of which then will be utilized against you to accelerate the process of dismantling society.
This happened hundreds of times before and it will keep happening forever because women just don't feel "right" in this environment.

Women will always despise men and they will never accept a society in which they have to share space with them. They will never think of men as their own people, it's not possible.

>>82147097
That explains your mental illness.

>>82147489
your girlfriend clearly doenst know the definiton of incel
you are baiting are you not?