>>82152311
Well one kind of evidence would be extra-territoriality.
French people in Occupied Vietnam had special rights over the locals
Like English people in South Africa
French people in Algeria.
"Europeans (pieds-noirs) were French citizens with full civil and political rights.
Most indigenous Algerians (Muslim Arabs and Berbers) were treated as subjects under a separate legal regime (the colonial administration applied special codes and summary regulations). They were not full French citizens unless they formally renounced personal-status law and accepted French civil law (a path few took)."
That is proof Algeria was greater France. They had special laws recognizing that this occupied territory was French, and that French people had special rights.
"Franchise and representation: Whites controlled political institutions. In most colonies and later in the Union, the franchise and representative offices were effectively reserved for whites. Colonial legislatures and later the Union government made the key laws.
Access to courts & legal equality: Whites enjoyed full recourse to colonial courts and were treated under "civil" legal systems (Roman-Dutch / British common law). Africans often remained subject to customary law or inferior administrative procedures for many matters, and colonial criminal and summary procedures could be applied preferentially.
A regime of passes, permits and controls restricted African movement into urban and white areas.
Government spending, curricula, and higher education institutions were overwhelmingly directed to white communities; missionary and limited state schools served Africans but at inferior levels."
This is proof that white people had privilege in South Africa over the locals.
Are there special courts for Jews in Ukraine that treat them less harshly? A system of Urban segregation & special zones where Jewish people are physically separated in ukraine like whites in South Africa?
