>>82177648
It's definitely not a flattering angle but I'm not seeing anything wrong here. The length looks pretty average, really. Like that other anon said, tops are generally not what we're after, though I wouldn't go as far as to call them "icky".
>>82177882
THIS is what I'd want to receive. My only critique is your use of the front-facing camera means the resolution sucks but even then I can tell your feet are well cared for and you have great arches.
If this guy responds negatively he's either an ironic footfag just plain gay. A real footfag isn't gonna bitch about something as trivial as the length of your toes.