Thread 82188892

bomb drones are bullshit and every war after this will be 20 times more deadly and more bullshit.
Thank god ISIS didint have this shit and i pray to god we dont get into another desert war for them to try it.

>>82188892 (OP)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vqsikut1WgQ
What is the upside of bomb drones over the Tomahawk Missiles we kept using against Iraq?

>>82189017
Bomb drones take like $200 to make

>>82188892 (OP)
you don't know the half of it, it's much more of a civil war and terrorism problem than a regular war problem. maybe even a gang warfare problem. large centralized states may not even be tenable in the long term.

>>82189053
No one realizes how much damage they can do to the systems infrastructure and it baffles me, but I shouldn't complain because if the shooting starts that means I can't goon in my room anymore

>>82189017
one can be only used by us the other can be used by everyone.

>>82189053
china will be fine, though they might have to let go of the uyghurs finally. the US? fucking lol, shoulda picked your own cotton.

>>82189123
Bomb drones are to Missiles what Technicals are to Tanks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_War
Anyone can hook up an MG to the back of a Toyota. It could never beat a tank. Bomb drone is going to lose to a missile

>>82189053
Governments will be soon fielding giantic quantum computers that will let glownigger AI daemons hack these at will most terrorists cannot into cryptography

I'm surprised more people haven't committed terorism/insurgency through EMP attacks there was a very interesting thing that a certain Serbian militia did using a hjijacked transformer and some tech...blew out the power for half of a city

>>82189144
The bomb drone can beat a tank, beat armored cars, can blow up helicopters mid flight, can clear out trenches, if set up properly, completely wipe out an airfield.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ywYohqoM60&list=RD9ywYohqoM60&start_radio=1

>>82189161
Retard, drones will be controlled thin fiber optic cable. Good luck hacking it.

>>82189022
Bomb drones do not cost $300 to make.They cost more like $5000. Most of thst price is the TATP it would be even more expensive if the explosive is military-graden cutting edge like C4/HMX that western militaries use instead of broke Russians and Hohols on a budget. Explosives are expensive. Also very heavy, the type of FPV that can carry a payload is expensive like maybe $1000retail price cheapest and you need a license but you could build them for $500 and you can use reused electronics/SDs iPhone parts which is what hohols do

>>82189186
Brother...how long do you think a fiber optics cable is..you know those things can get tangled right

A great way to tell everyone exactly where you are too

>>82189211
QUICK PRIVATE, TRAIL THAT FIBER OPT-
>ACKKK

Going to be pretty chill as a civilian in modern drone wars

>>82189221
wait based, only soldiers and politicians will be killed

>>82189218
You realize ukraine FPVs have an effective range of potentially kilometers...whats the point of an FPV if you are in range to just shoot them with an RPG think bozo think

Maybe nanofiberoptics but that's cutting edge tech only glowies will have access to that

>>82189233
dude drones can go 40 kilometers and an rpg is like 500 meters

>>82189053
terrorists arent smart enough to use them yet.

>>82189262
Yeah that my point that's why fiber optics unless you're taling about some cool localized operation is pointless as a result drones are vulnerable to interference/jammers not cost effective in modern warfare cause artillery/mortars are still the crown of modern war a jammer is probably like $60k and reveals its exact location on use then the enemy can shell it for $200 drone wins

But it's good at stopping terrorists... Netanyahu paid a certain Finnish company like $50 million in jew gold for a personal antidrone system rather interesting...

Also they are vulnerable even at range cost effectively to automated high-gauge shotgun turrets DARPA is working on something like that anyways it's transformative but not gonna end the world...also unless you live in a Banana republic like Iraq the biggest problem is access to high explosives anyways once you have that it's pretty easy to kill a shit-ton of people even without FPVs

>>82189170
Yes and a missile can do that faster and with more force
A bomb drone is slower and cheaper. It is less sophisticated

>>82189292
It's about economy, now a smaller military can touch you and hurt you real bad for a fraction of the price, taking out your expensive toys with a flying piece of shit, large scale combined tank/infantry assaults aren't a thing anymore because drones negated that

>>82189211
Anon that's exactly what's being used in ukraine, they literally hook their drones to fiber optic cables that are several kilometers long. It's even becoming an environmental issue because fields and forests are full of fucking fiber optic cables.

>>82189017
Tomahawk is expensive as fuck.

>>82189287
>fiber optics is pointless
You keep saying that, but that's literally what they're using.

>>82189345
> thin strands of glass
They'll get chopped into pieces eventually, by vehicles, agricultural machinery, etc.
It's glass, essentially sand.

>>82189017
tomahawks cost $3-4 million a pop to operate if you're importing them

>>82189204
>talking out of your ass
most ukrainian drones are fpvs and do cost 300-600 dollars
western countries are starting to produce 800-1400 dollar range fpv drones that are a lot more capable
you don't really want to go over 1500 for an fpv because then you're too close to the price of an artillery shell (~2000) and you lose the price advantage and might aswell buy more artillery
loitering and self-directed munitions are ~30 000 dollars and up but their use case is completely different from artillery shells and FPVs which share a lot of their tasks

>>82190429
Eat a spoonful of glass spikes and tell me how you like it and how it's not a problem.

soldiers are proxies for their commanders
commanders are proxies for the pedophiles and drug traffickers that rule the nation
drones are proxies for soldiers
the money and glory isn't worth it, military service is and always will be retarded

>>82188892 (OP)
>Thank god ISIS didint have this shit
They did have it. Not the FPV drones with the shaped charges, but they did use drones and and improvised release mechanisms to drop explosives.

>>82190581
They're on the ground, anyone eating that has bigger problems.

>>82190429
only those are most likely plastic

we need to bring caturday to the trenches https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quC6Vu2XgOk

>>82189017
Bomb drones are cheap as fuck and don't require a specialized launcer. Your soldiers can just carry them in a backpack and launch them from practically anywhere, potentially from less than a kilometer away. They're also hard to detect and with the fiber wire ones you can't even use electronic jamming.
>be pvt. anon
>notice spotter drone flying overhead
>a couple minutes later half your squad is blown up by an FPV drone