Thread 82213668

>I think therefore I am
>to think you are assumes that there is already a you to think
>But if I can observe my surroundings, they must be real!
>or they're just a hallucination dreamed up by a sleeping butterfly
>But we're real!
>according to who? your butterfly-brain dream?
>We have inherent purpose! I know it! God and philosophy say so!
>no, we don't. we get birthed, we work, we die.
>But Descartes says-
>you mean an old french virgin? no thanks, i'll keep getting my philosophy from new jersey ska bands

cogito ergo sugma balls, anons. both these people are stupid. make your own purpose

Wouldve been cool to not be holocausted by indian immigrants, if youre white and go along with that you deserve brain damage

>>82213668 (OP)
I think therefore i am.

therefore i am what i think.

i am chad.

>>82213668 (OP)
i would say that someone who at least tries to come up with an idea that could be understood by another person is infinitely smarter than someone spouting your "JUST BE A TOTAL INDIVIDUAL BRO I HAVE NO CAPACITY FOR COLLECTIVE THOUGHT OR ACTION LMAO" nonsense