She's correct. The worst thing to happen to feminism was watering it down and saying it's for "equality" and that "men suffer too".
No. It's for women's liberation. Not for men.
>>82255688 (OP)
where's the boot, women are doing better than men on a lot of stats in the first world are they not? will it be the same oppression talk forever?
>>82255688 (OP)
You can say this same thing about any bad thing in the entire world, having to go to work is just as much of a boot on my neck, same with paying taxes, and same with obeying laws in general.
>>82255688 (OP) >remove the boot >get handed preferential selection and privileges >retain your old preferential treatment and privileges still >non chads are still oppressed >still get used and abused by chads with abundance of choice >spin yourself into a neurotic grave in your 50's after convincing the next generation of women to continue this march
>>82255688 (OP)
I'm sure all the blacks and browns coming into white countries will help women defeat the evil white male oppressors and usher in the feminist utopia.
>>82255688 (OP)
Basic logic? Patriarchy as a theory is not actionable. At least I haven't heard of any policy suggestions. Gender quotas? Would we still live in a patriarchy and are we ready for that change?
>>82255688 (OP) >i could defeat the patriarchy single handedly by dating feminine manlet weaklings >nope ill reproduce with conservative misogyny chad instead because he is 6'5 and masculine