>>82257854 (OP)
So this shit has bugged me cause I remember what happened but for some reason everyone has a shit memory span.
>I can't remember exact year, but late 90s early 2000s they made an announcement they were dropping the famous cornucopia.
>News even asked the audience to tell them they thought via Web 1.0 methods.
Fast forward multiple decades
>Ummm the cornucopia never existed
Except the only reason anyone knows what a fucking cornucopia is is because of fruit of the loom.
So now there are all kinds of elaborate theories about muh dimensional merging or other crap.
Let me tell you what the actual conspiracy theory is.
>If you wanted to control the past and guage data points of what people actually remember the past, remember incorrectly, what you can argue away via claims of "bootlegged fruit of the loom" arguments, how long any media proving you wrong will last or how well you can cover the tracks of making people believe something they know never existed while crippling search engines and making ALL info difficult to find what would be a great way to test this out?
A silly thing like fruit of the loom seems like a good candidate. Pretty overious lie with pretty good data.
I think it's all a massive gaslighting test. How much can you get away with, get deleted, etc? How much will people care and scrutinize it? Can you get people to believe fake changes happened with the same logic? How far will people go to disprove you? Can you discredit these people as crazies?
Sound insane? How useful will this be when something like a 2nd attempt at medical Marshall law and trying to reframe COVID vax passports goes down?
What about people asking pesky questions about 9/11?
Did anyone else who hung out in certain communities get soldiers throwing tantrums saying Iraq DID have weapons of mass destruction and the media just lied? I got that one multiple times and found it strange.
When you think of it as information warfare training exercises, suddenly it clicks
