← Home ← Back to /r9k/

Thread 82260528

23 posts 14 images /r9k/
Anonymous No.82260528 >>82260565 >>82260710 >>82260718 >>82260835 >>82261847 >>82262758
>There are always for more men who can impregnate women than there are women available to impregnate.
Now you are conscious of this fact.
Anonymous No.82260565 >>82260668 >>82260695 >>82260699 >>82261906 >>82261952 >>82262785 >>82262858 >>82263029 >>82263446
>>82260528 (OP)
why exactly did nature decide there needed to be two sexes and that one would be the expendable fodder worker sex and the other the worshipped sex that continues the species? Wouldn't it be easier for there to just be one sex that can breed and do physical shit?
Anonymous No.82260668
>>82260565
we will never find out the answer to this
Anonymous No.82260695 >>82260818 >>82262980
>>82260565
Because nature is retarded.
But the effect you are describing is only applicable in the future world of full freedom and liberation, it wasn't what it was optimizing for in the past.

>Until 50k years ago:
There were 2 culture variations.

1. Everyone did it with everyone else but because of timing and semen quality, quantity & frequency, some passed on more. Or
2. Women were traded goods. The highest status male with strongest political coalition members that wouldn't kill him got to take upto 3 of the best wives(not too many to keep the rest happy), best as in most attractive and youngest to make most kids over lifetime and lower mortality rate of kid, she'll be traded down later to switch to better women. Top status males get the women, the rest don't. Competitions were necessary to gain status, gain coalition and get access to women. This is why most modern men are subhumans internally, around 45% of males(40% white, 50% black) in US gets arrested at least once by age 23 for non-traffic related reasons, so the actual chimp out rate is much higher that doesn't go to arrest.

>Around 50k years ago:
To reduce cost of male male competition of everyone killing each other for access to women, tribes with cultures that killed each other less flourished more. This was achieved by the invention of marriage. Everyone goes without women until of age, after they are handed a woman and then they keep them for life. Some may get more than one or switch around but it's largely 1:1 with male female ratio. Males focused more on their offspring instead of competing for more women as it was against cultural sanction. Tribes thrived and culture spread.

>Around 10k years ago
Culture of marriage remained but power was centralization as people don't move around with food anymore. They need central organization to survive and can be controlled. The ones at top and their friends marry as much as possible and rest gets used as slaves and with little to no chance of marriage.
Anonymous No.82260699
>>82260565
Evolution peaked with asexual organisms
Anonymous No.82260710
>>82260528 (OP)
buzz buzz nigga buzz buzz
Anonymous No.82260718 >>82260769
>>82260528 (OP)
A tiny bit more men are born, but men also have higher mortality rates, so this analysis is an oversimplification.
Anonymous No.82260748
i always tried to bring this point up to people but no one would listen
Anonymous No.82260769 >>82261862
>>82260718
You did not understand what I said.

I'm not talking about male female ratio. I'm talking about reproductively capable male female ratio at any give time, the thing that matters most for evolution. Males far outnumber women in that group.

You are also wrong about male female mortality rate, they are about equal in still existing hunter gatherer tribes. This is because a lot more women die of birth related complication or nutrient shortage of child rearing.
Anonymous No.82260818
>>82260695
I'll finish up my blog.

>Around 5k years ago
Accidental religious takeover and spread of culture to redistribute women to each man began with some minor exception at top.

>Current
Both men and women gets a say. Still preaches a culture of redistribution but lacking any strong institution of distribution. Things are weird as women in the past never had real mate selection choices and their preferences are not their own sexual selection. What women have are lower degrees of what selection preferences men had for women(because unless selected against anything that passes on will pass on to both genders), so women actually are attracted to women more and men that has faces closer to women(what? that's can be! but it is true) and like women, women will readily to submit and work with higher status male as it increases coalition status for men and increases access to women, but women has this preference too... things are just weird with women having choice now, although they should. 99% of dating problems arise from the fact that, internally women are like men.

>Future
A small blackhole flying around randomly eats up the sun and then earth flies off in random direction and everyone freezes to death.
Anonymous No.82260835
>>82260528 (OP)
>Now you are conscious of this fact.
Yes, and I fucking hate it.
Anonymous No.82261847
>>82260528 (OP)
hourly reminder ping

God of evolution made human males to be in constant competition.

There is no real short term escape from this suffering. Alternative to subjugation is to either reduce male birth and/or increase female birth.
Anonymous No.82261862 >>82261928
>>82260769
>they are about equal in still existing hunter gatherer tribes
You don't live in a hunter gatherer tribe, you live in a modern society, where men have higher mortality rates.
Anonymous No.82261906
>>82260565
Nature has already done what you described but sexual reproduction has many benefits over asexual.
Anonymous No.82261928
>>82261862
True, women have better immune system for birthing and evolutionary grandmothering benefits also found in other mammals.

The main point being I'm not talking about male female ratio in the world which I take to be approximately 1:1. But ratio of human females that can be impregnated and males that can impregnate them at any given moment in time. Men are always in competition, cultural setup we are trained in from birth just makes it seem business as usual. Male dating/attraction/interests are around reproductively capable females.
Anonymous No.82261947
You live in a rat utopia now you are conscious of this
Anonymous No.82261952
>>82260565
>why did it decide
It didnt, it just happened
Anonymous No.82262758
>>82260528 (OP)
designated hourly truvth nuke bump
Anonymous No.82262785
>>82260565
basically sexual reproduction = genetic diversity = evolving MUCH faster than asexual reproduction and healthy genetic traits can come along faster

that's the only reason
Anonymous No.82262858
>>82260565
Futa worldbuilder.
Anonymous No.82262980
>>82260695
Nature really is retarded and horrifying at times, but it's powerful and smart in other ways. Maybe making species fuck themselves into dysgenic extinction is a way of nature protecting itself from itself.

I know humans overall are a plague but it's really beautiful in a fucked up way that humans have the power to upset the natural order and make pets out of wolves and give them a good and satisfying and much less harsh life than they would experience in the wild. I mean, it's beautiful when it's not some fat woman living in a city block with a pitbull.
Anonymous No.82263029
>>82260565
because dipshit men usually die more then women during childhood so it would even out but in the span of 100 years we fucked around and no pretty much no ones dies as a child
Anonymous No.82263446
>>82260565
No, two sex procreation is just more effective. Obviously not all species have such defined gender roles, however since humans are the dominant species on earth, then we are also most efficient.

In a practical sense it's easy to see why - the sex that carries baby is just automatically more vulnerable because creating said baby requires too many resources and energy and nature does not have a way to appropriately feed both so that the female won't need to sacrifice anything from herself. So you just minmax her to be weak and then compensate for it by making men do all the hard stuff. If men didn't, humanity would die out as mothers would be able to carry baby to the term, and would just die from randomshit midway through.