>>82295445
>>82295467
A lot of guys don't want to hear it, but especially in the case of our women this is true.
Anyone saying "but le women voted for this" doesn't understand how societies or people function at a fundamental level. Probably half or fewer of young women actually vote for sandniggers to come in to replace the population. Even the ones that do are largely the way they are because men have failed in their station in society.
I know it sounds like a copout to blame men, but we have always had far more agency in society. If the majority of men were to simply say "no" and implement even the basest measures against anything women voted for they would be completely helpless. What are they going to do, protest? A single relatively healthy adult man could probably remove five women from a protest with his bare hands.
And no matter what our women are still our women. We need them and they need us. That will never go away. We need to protect them even when they make stupid decisions, as none of this would have happened if we hadn't given them the right to make such decisions in the first place.
>TL;DR
It's our fault for letting them vote in the first place, and we still need to show racial solidarity