Thread 82304990

I'm kinda getting tired of millennial dipshits expecting me to rid my life of any enjoyment to "save the environment"
I'm not going to stop eating meat or stop buying shit with disposable packaging

I'm not the asshole dumping waste in the ocean or cutting down forests
I recycle and try to conserve the best I can but I'm not gonna bend over backwards and live a boring life just to please faggot millennials who are looking for any reason to be a misanthropist

Go join a clean up group and get the trash out of the ocean if you're that fucking concerned, cunt

>>82304990 (OP)
You must think very highly of yourself if you think anyone is talking about you. People are talking about corporations and billionaires, you are about as significant as an ant on the sidewalk. 1 billionaire taking 1 private jet to 1 location 1 time is more emissions than you produce in months. Get over yourself, cunt.

>>82304990 (OP)
>I'm not going to stop eating meat
you should stop eating meat because its morally wrong. its animal murder. you wouldnt be okay if aliens treated you the same way you treat cows and pigs. go watch a documentary on how cows are killed on youtube, like "dominion". its very evil and cruel
you stop eating meat for the animals, not for the environment

>I'm not the asshole dumping waste in the ocean or cutting down forests
i mean you kind of are if you eat meat but delude yourself all you want

>>82305027
There's plenty of loons who demand everyone conform to their standards of eco-friendliness

>>82305077
I've seen a few different slaughter house documentaries and I still eat meat

I really don't give a fuck

>>82305080
No serious person with any degree of understanding of the scope of climate change is asking individuals to use less plastics. Its like saying planting trees is going to fix climate change, it misses the scale of the issue by several orders of magnitude. Outside of liberal politicians who are ideologically married to the idea of individualism, I really don't see many people making arguments about individual people's choices having an impact on climate change. Maybe college kids who haven't taken a course that introduces them to thermodynamics?

>>82305113
yeah sure but its like, its still wrong innit?
if you dont care about being a morally evil person, then just admit it and forget about it

>>82305077
This is a stupid argument for several reasons.
1. Humans need to eat meat to get a balanced and healthy diet
2. All carnivorous and omnivorous animals eat other animals. It's not murder, it's natural order of things.
3. If we didn't keep animals for food, there would be much less animals and some species would probably go extinct. You think domestic cows can survive in nature? Or chickens? The only reason they are so many is because we are breeding and keeping them. If we were not, they would just get killed by some other animal 5 minutes after we release them all lmao

If you don't want to eat meat, fine. But don't try to pull some moral guilt on others for it

>>82305161
>1. Humans need to eat meat to get a balanced and healthy diet
Im not even onboard with the anti meat arguments, this is just wrong. There are plenty of ways in the modern world to get all of your calories and nutrients from non meat sources. This coming from a meatavoire.

>>82305161
>Humans need to eat meat to get a balanced and healthy diet
cmon bro this is obviously wrong. theres plenty of vegans and vegetarians who life a long life. the lima-londa vegetarians are part of the "blue zone group"- people who are very likely to live to 100

your claims are simply not true. its just an excuse

>All carnivorous and omnivorous animals eat other animals. It's not murder, it's natural order of things.
whats nature isnt whats moral. that is an is-ought fallacy. animals also kill eachother all the time, kill their own children all the time, rape eachtoher all the time. but that doesnt mean humans can do around raping and killing their own children because animals do it. we dont get our morals from wild animals

>If we didn't keep animals for food, there would be much less animals and some species would probably go extinct
the problem is we keep breeding them into existence in the first place. they shouldn't be bred into existence to be killed

>>82305127
I don't care about being a morally evil person

>>82305203
yeah thats fine. if you dont care then nobody can stop you or force you
you are strong, they are weak and defenseless, and you just dont care
what can you do. it is what it is

>>82305200
>incoherent veggitard babble
lol, lmao even, gonna cook some beautiful ribeye on the grill today and there ain't a goddamn thing you can do about it
fuck nature, God made us to be on top of the food chain and i'm going to fucking enjoy that ribeye with family and friends
>b-but, le heckin murder!
not. my. problem.

>>82305200
NTA
Right now there is a child holocaust being perpetrated by the western governments and israel. Humans are not too far off the wild animals you mention in your post. What is really the difference between Netanyahu, Hitler and a random schmuck? The answer is very little, humans are violent, barbaric, vile creatures who have the capacity to mass slaughter hundreds of thousands of their own children, we are watching it happen right now. I really don't think morality arguments are going to be very effective against a species that mass slaughters their own children.

>>82305233
this pig looks yummy as fuck, i love bacon so much it's unreak

>>82305258
very well

>>82305263
yeah but like, nobody can do anything about israel. but anyone can stop eating meat. and ur right; nobody cares about morals

>>82305267
sad, but i guess morals are only for the weak

>>82305300
there is NO moral argument to be made because it's a logical loophole :
- EITHER you believe that there are objective morals to abide which must imply the existence of a divine force, and thus you accept that eating meat is what God wanted us to do
- OR you don't believe in God and thus cannot pretend to define what "morals" are because we're just animals like the rest of them and killing other animals is justified because it's in our programming
stop trying to turn your personal choice into a nu-cult of the good guys, dipshit

>>82305300
>morals are only for the weak
Yes

>>82305315
Bro wtf. Why are you bringing god Into this? Morals are social constructs that prevent socially destructive behaviors by stigmatizing them. Wtf is this god argument?

>>82304990 (OP)
This is a way of living.