← Home ← Back to /r9k/

Thread 82323042

5 posts 2 images /r9k/
Anonymous No.82323042 >>82323901 >>82324013 >>82324412
I wonder what would happen if I started arguing with women the way women argue with men
"Oh yeah? Name 5 men who feel comfortable sharing their real feelings with you"
"Ugh, you're such a sexist pig, get a man to commit to you already fucking femcel"
"You're EXACTLY the type of woman my grandpa warned me about when there were no women around"
"You think men should pay on the first date? What are you, some kind of deranged patriarchal fascist?"

I don't think it would work because women are incapable of feeling shame about anything except their bodies but it's interesting to think about
Anonymous No.82323901 >>82324706
>>82323042 (OP)

dear god, i hate the way women think. these irrational, emotional creatures that live in a bubble. i wish i could trim the fat, so to speak, and keep the good stuff about women's psychology like motherhood, nurturing, etc.
Anonymous No.82324013 >>82324706
>>82323042 (OP)
Whether conscious of the irony or not they would just scream at you and call you gay for talking to them in such an effete manner.
Anonymous No.82324412 >>82324706
>>82323042 (OP)
i kinda do tho. say low effort bait tier shit like ''this is why you're single/only douchebags like you.'' ''maybe guys wouldn't use you for sex if you had anything else to offer.''
Anonymous No.82324706
>>82323901
The "good stuff" you're thinking of is just social posturing they do to look good btw
>>82324013
Which is funny to me because that's another error they make, if not having sex with women is the main reason to criticize women then that implies that the main reason *not* to criticize women is having sex with them, which in turn means that a woman's main value is sex. They always show that deep down, they understand that.
>>82324412
What do they say? The "guys wouldn't just use you for sex if you were good for anything else" is a favorite point of mine