← Home ← Back to /r9k/

Thread 82328648

15 posts 8 images /r9k/
Anonymous No.82328648 >>82329132 >>82329261 >>82329344 >>82329724 >>82329769 >>82329819
why dont transphobes know the difference between converse and contrapositive
Anonymous No.82329052 >>82329087 >>82329716
Of course it's a feminist saying this retarded shit.
>Your daily reminder that if "squares are rectangles" was true, the corrolary mantra "rectangles are squares" would be equally true.
Anonymous No.82329087 >>82329093 >>82329098 >>82329261
>>82329052
squares AREN'T rectangles doe
Anonymous No.82329093 >>82329111
>>82329087
They are, go back to math class.
Anonymous No.82329098
>>82329087
Precisely my point.
Anonymous No.82329111 >>82329116
>>82329093
just use your fucking eyes do you really think these are the same thing?
Anonymous No.82329116
>>82329111
>Two rectangles
Lmao
Anonymous No.82329132
>>82328648 (OP)
Why don't Troons realize we don't want you around our children?
Anonymous No.82329261
>>82328648 (OP)
>contrapositive.
>converse
Wow. I didn't know there was an even worse pretentious way to say that than not all rectangles are squares. I seriously doubt the transphobe was trying to say that those who aren't women aren't transwomen or had any notion of using philosophy of logic in their tweet.
>>82329087
They are. What you probably mean to say is that squares aren't the same thing as rectangles. They're different concepts, like a cup and mug. Similarly, woman, and trans woman are different phrases and still mean different things.
Anonymous No.82329344
>>82328648 (OP)
Its either a subset of women and so a modifying term to distinguish from broader women, or a distinct category. If its a subset then you would have to explain how "male by sex but feels like a female" is part of women, and if its just an asserted definition then no one but those who hold that definition are bound to that rationale and so the entire disagreement is semantics from your asserted definition
Anonymous No.82329716 >>82329802
>>82329052
I don't know what a corollary mantra is, and I don't know the difference between a converse and a contrapositive is. But what I do know is that there is almost nothing more annoying than multisyllabic Latinate words one after the other in an otherwise mundane context. If you can't say it in plain Anglo-Saxon English language then it's not about something applicable to daily life. I'm so sick of midwits spinning their wheels at full throttle at each other and gibbering endlessly about nothing.
Anonymous No.82329724
>>82328648 (OP)
So impressive how women still manage to be wrong and retarded when trying to make the basic point that men can't be women
Anonymous No.82329769
>>82328648 (OP)
Why do trannies devolve all of female existence and experience into a box that is just: has tits, makeup, pretty clothes, and feels "womeny". Do they realize that they are just advanced sexists who think their male stereotype of a woman perfectly emulates the female experience?
Anonymous No.82329802
>>82329716
My first language is romance and and even I know that the amount of non-germanic words directly correlates to bullshit.
Anonymous No.82329819
>>82328648 (OP)
Anyone with a 3 digit IQ has realized by now that cute trannies are better than real women.