Thread 82389368

Where do they have books like these but for straight men?

>>82389368 (OP)
its called pornhub, men are more visual so go there.

>>82389377
I have plenty of pics of this kind of thing but I'd like to read some romance about it. Not fair for women to have all the fun. Also pornhub is banned in my state.

Those are also written with as bland of a female protagonist as possible so the average foid can self-insert. men are too diverse for that.

>>82389368 (OP)

>stalking
>domination
>rape or pseudorape
>criminality
>beastiality
>daddy play

This is what women consider romance? Holy guacamole batman!

>>82389368 (OP)
>monster men
:/
>monster girls
:o

I read a book like that as a teenager and in retrospect it was so fucked up. It was like, phantom of the opera and 50 shades of grey had a baby. The guy was a deformed abusechad that lived under a building in secret and fucked the teen protag

>>82389368 (OP)
Are you being serious? I can't tell.

>>82389368 (OP)
I'm not sure about books but you'll find plenty of visual stuff on it like manga, comics, etc.

>>82389476
not out in the open like that, women can get away with reading outright porn in public with zero consequences.

>>82389409
>acting like the same thing but for men doesnt happen in literally every single piece of media ever, especially in anime
you guys love to pretend like youre so much better and special

>>82389405
Women are very behind on the material anon. Half those books were stories in Japan literature from the 80s and 90s. Even now their are a good amount of monsuta musume made. While I haven't read any of those books it's a safe bet you can find an already existing version of those stories with human male w/monster female over there.

>>82389508
its because most people dont really notice because its a literal book and not pictures of naked women

>>82389368 (OP)
>Nowhere you're a monster and a sex pest creep. Don't you DARE have fetishes

>>82389418
>stalking
>rape or pseudorape
Yes this is the kind of thing I'm looking for. As long the monster woman isn't always completely intense and is nice sometimes.

>>82389444
too anime, not monstrous enough. I'm not really fond of anime girl stereotypes and those are just normal women with some monster features strapped on. I want something with a bit more edge.

>>82389508
What does that have to do with the OP? but that's bullshit that OP pic is from a Barns and Nobels and they have the Manga smut stuff like Kenkou Cross' Monster Girl Encyclopedia and Everyday life with Monster girls out and center with no issue.
If a girl thinks you're gross/creepy she'll judge you no matter what you do. The good news it's rare for them to even notice people outside their friend groups so you can do as you please with little issue.

>>82389368 (OP)
Archive of Our Own has plenty of stories for men. I use it all the time. I don't know any that have been officially published because I read things more degenerate than those books.

>>82389519
this, most books about monster women romancing men are subtle in their covers because if a guy cared about how they look on the cover they read the adult comics and mangas about them instead.

>>82389524
There are at least 500 novels you can search up anon. I say start with The Golem and the Jinni
Enjoy.

Was OP trying to retardly turn this into a "it's OK when women do it" about a media that has been male dominated since before the 1st century?

Really?

>>82389615
No I'm asking for recommendations fag.

>>82389643
It's clear some idiot was trying that though so be pissed at him for poisoning your thread into incel rage bait.

>>82389368 (OP)
Men don't read and if they did it would not be allowed to exist out in the open.

>>82389368 (OP)
I'm currently writing two to three novels that are essentially men's erotica with monster (women). Not "le anime with cat ears" monster-girls. But I'll prolly never finish them because men don't read and I am a defeatist.

The secret?
/hmofa/ stories and i'm not even joking

>>82389701
>/hmofa/ stories
Is it still just pokemon fan-fic smut with lopunny still?

>>82389695
Even if only a few people ever read your story. If they love it isn't it worth it?

>>82389725
Nope. There's quite a lot now, mostly (admittedly) anthro women and human men falling in love, usually alongside adventure/horror/comedy/etc.

I have unironically read books like in OP's pic (Shadow Hunters and Clockwork Angel and a TON of other YA girl slop) AND /hmofa/ writing and some stories from that degenerate thread are unironically 10x better than print fiction. Only they're geared at men.

>>82389368 (OP)
The "Soul to Keep" series has several male human's with female monster romances in the books.

>>82389695
Markets out there, just don't bring it here. Place will ruin any chance you have to get traction. Overall you are not wrong and even most of the novels that are about monster females with human males the general readers are women because the majority of guys want the visuals. I'm guilty of that myself.

>>82389377
>men are more visual
>women are emotional
etc. These arent even true.
I had my hardest erections reading text.
(Straight, not a furryfag, not an animefag.)

>>82389368 (OP)
Apart from odd stories on the interwebs, i think your best bet is LLMs. Assuming you have a sliver of creativity.

>>82389736
Yeah, one novel I am writing has about 50 to 60 pages deep and it's more monster domination, forced non-con sex/mating with a human. The other is kinda similar, but has a more manipulative vibe to it. I'd say my current line up is domination or pseudo-domination. Then I have another where it's a reverse isekai where a short-stack enters the protagonists life, but that's my least interesting novel atm, since it's pretty predictable.
>>82389749
Yeah, a lot of "male erotica + romance" just falls under power and fantasy harems most of the time. Especially isekai novels, which are a naughty habit that I like to read, but it's all so one trick pony novels. It also doesn't help there is a HUGE anti-male bias for erotica and sexuality versus women's erotica and sexuality. Especially selling it on major platforms. Where it goes into some fucking taboo areas that would be seen as horrendous if men wrote about it, but acceptable for women's erotica. Men's erotica/sexuality is VERY neutered and heavily policed versus women's which I never liked the double standard.

>>82389653
>>82389615
I'm not the anon but they're right. It IS OK when women do it. OP's pic shows porn books displayed 10 feet from a shelf of Bibles. That should not be allowed.

I don't give a fuck about what abstract men from the abstract past were able to do, I'm not them. I'm an individual living in the present.

>>82389518
Typhlosion learned from the best.