>>82393406
>emotional fluency
Gay new age term that even she can't fulfill due to poor emotional regulation on this topic, also makes poor emotional decisions like putting a third hole in her nose
>collaboration instead of control
Sounds retarded and vague, like one person shouldn't take the lead on something (maybe planning a wedding, maybe building a deck), as if they accept absolutely no feedback from their supposed partner? Seems like an overly emotional reaction to not being in charge of something, perhaps upset that he told her that her idea for the kitchen renovation or something was stupid (it probably was). Ironically, sounds like she wants to control how men are through some mother nature fantasy rather than collaborate.
>protection without dominance
Also sounds retarded and vague since the role of protector is inherently dominant by definition and the same applies with being protected/submissive, just a failure to control envious emotional outbursts when some gratefulness would be more appropriate
>say women can lead
Sounds like a "boyfriend" said this and she's still upset, another example of poor emotional fluency. Also, her emotional volatility is not ideal in terms of leadership. Sure, I've seen women do well in supervisory roles, so what? Usually when I hear people talking about that, they're more specifically referring to the darker side of humanity, incredibly stressful scenarios like war, which tend to be male-dominated (back to the protection dominance thing)
I know she wants to feel the control as a selector, but women are so not worth it now that they use tattoos to cover up their fat. That'd be like me shitting myself to hide the fact that I pissed myself.
