Thread 82403667

It seems that it is becoming gradually harder to get (You)s whenever posting in others threads or making your own. Have you guys also noticed this or am I just crazy?
>Inb4 it's you
I don't think my posts' quality is the issue here, and I don't wanna bait just for attention cause that's for retards

>>82403667 (OP)
Foids getting all the yous on here bro.

>>82403667 (OP)
Anttime I reply to a "foid's" thread, it always dies. Something about my ubermensch autism always taints the thread, and I love it

>>82403682
>>82403687
Yeah it's most likely foid threads once again poisoning the catalog. The real issue there is that all of it is just lonely men pretending to be women for (You), which has shifted the entire board culture around cheap deception instead of actually putting effort into writing something

Most posts are either retarded baiting or retarded blogspamming. Most yous are basically little cliques with the genuine posters coming very ocasionally or just giving up for good reason.

>>82403667 (OP)
the board is dying, the website is dying.

>>82403667 (OP)
>are we getting (you)flation?
>describes the opposide of inflation
So, which side of your head did your mom drop you on as a baby anon? Or was it every side?

>>82403667 (OP)
The problem is that the only people left are either shitposters and literal horny faggots spamming their fetishes or giving 500 replies to anyone saying (with no proof whatsoever) that they're female, or narcissists who use this place as a (dead lmao)chatroom to talk to their friends. There is almost nobody left willing to talk and put in effort in talking to Anonymous, so baiting for attention like a retard is the only way left to farm (You)s

>>82403840
basically

>>82403853
'member when the IP counter on the bottom right was removed and everyone was paranoid about the site being taken over by bots? I 'member

>>82403890
>member when the IP counter on the bottom right was removed and everyone was paranoid about the site being taken over by bots? I 'member
Pardon my newfaggotry but why was it removed, again? Did they even give us a reasoning behind that decision?

>>82404016
>Did they even give us a reasoning behind that decision?
Nope. Come to think of it, even after the hack, Hiro and the staff have remained almost entirely silent. My theory is that they did that to both appease and assure possible advertisers and userbase that everything is fine and dandy.

In reality the problem was so bad (and they KNEW how bad it was) that the timers and extra verification steps were introduced, shafting legitimate users and most likely letting spammers and hostile agents go business as usual (lets be honest, bypassing that shit is trivial for anyone invested in it, ironically only real users get harmed by it)

>>82403667 (OP)
I rarely get replies. At least any that turn into a worthwhile conversation.