>>82419511 (OP)
This woman is fundamentally retarded and contradictory in her thinking.
I'm going to assume that her valued judgement of this phenomena is not her arguing the "natural" way for sexual selection to occur is "good" because it is natural because that is a fallacy. She is making this judgement based on the fact that human progression "genetics" progress the human race. This is a fundamentally eugenic paradigm of progress.
Thus, why are we discounting low-genetic quality women in this equation? They are just as much responsible for low genetic quality men as low genetic quality men are. I would honestly argue they are more responsible. Since men select for shorter females due to attraction to submissiveness, men will fuck 5'2 broads and will output a 5'7 manlet. If her goal is human evolution and progress (which I know it isn't, shes just a narcicisstic mentally ill foid that just wants the benefits of girlbossing) she should advocate that only the most genetically fit humans should reproduce ever, not specifically men. Maybe it would work.
Also, this structure of patriarchy creates an equilibrium so that women are less likely to mate upward, which destabilizes society. 1/10 foids should not select for the genetics of 10/10 chads. Everyone in this scenario gets their looks match. If you want proper civilization, plumbing and all of the cushy civilizational aspects all foids take for granted, sub 5 men should be able to get pussy.