Thread 82433944

foids either see you as a dick to stick in them or an emotional tampon. they offer no reassurance, no stability. and they wonder why we are violent against them. they are useless for interpersonal relationships if it wasnt because of biology. they have no use, atleast we can keep the maintenance of society. Build things, etc. What do they offer, breeding impulsive low iq crotch goblins with behavioral problems and put more of a straine on the system? funny, so their initial purpose is actually a burden for everyone else. We can bypass the females body to create better lives with machine. all it takes is patience and technological progress to finally make a scientific breakthrough. Im not showing the pride of man kind over gods deisgn, more like a desire to cut off the useless fat that keeps humanity from ascending. Unfortunately, femicide doesnt exist, it should and the numbers of dead cuntoids should increase.

>>82433944 (OP)
incels are violent to random women even if they never hung out or vibed with the women before.

>>82433944 (OP)
>femicide doesn't exist
it does if you start doing it

>>82433961
people have known about the incel problem for a while now.

>>82433961
crazy how domestic violence goes brr even amongst lesbians. somehow we are still the problem. go back to your orbitor simps or whatever good bye.

>>82433962
governments are too gynocentric to do that. they always need to appease the cunt before making policies.

>>82434059
>domestic violence
if you think that's bad, just wait until you find out about incel violence.

>>82434071
>doesnt realize said incel has to engage with the foid prior to killing her
oh appeal to circular logic and deny yoyr end of it. oh

>>82434059
why would you wait for the government to take action? when has that ever helped? Be the change you want to see in the world

>>82434108
end incel violence and people will feel more sympathy for people who haven't had sex yet.

>>82434160
stop being insufferable and maybe men wouldnt want to commit violence against women

>>82434176
how do you know she is insufferable if you pick random women to attack or harass?

>>82434193
because women also do it to each other when they live together, funny right?

>>82434211
i wouldn't even be surprised if incels hardly ever go on dates.

>>82434219
why would an incel want to interact with someone he knows would be insufferable?

>>82434239
because incels notoriously have the lowest IQ in the group chat.

>>82434241
usually you need a high iq to have pattern recognition. are you saying you are more mentally incompetent than low iq midwits? very telling

>>82433944 (OP)
Pussy is a drug and I am addicted. I don't give a fuck what my foid does to me honestly. She is just going to slobber those lips in my face and I'd beg.

>>82434254
why would anyone need a pattern of incels being violent? just punish them.

>>82434281
>horrible reading comprehension
oh, guess my assumption was right. sorry for your limited capacity.

>>82434290
you should be sorry about incels being evil.

>>82434300
im sorry that you arent aware why incels are violent against cuntoids to begin with. best i can really do while still being honest.

>>82434338
incels are dishonest about why they are violent, hence the random targeting instead of targeting anyone insufferablmaxxing

>>82433944 (OP)
>foids either see you as a dick to stick in them or an emotional tampon
This is why you have to learn how to Trojan-max. Foids open up to you emotionally and expect you to be kind to them in there. Literally just listen to the foid until she reveals something that she likes or is pissed off about and use that to bully her and exert a degree of soft power over her.

The more information you can get, the better: her vocal intonations and her facial expressions. Just be patient, learn her ticks, say exactly what you know will keep her engaged and talking with you, get her to share enough that she's afraid of what you might think(you will know because she will keep hesitating, like there's something she wants to say but can't or won't properly vocalize it.) And then and only then, when she refuses to talk about herself because she's afraid of revealing too much, you start talking about yourself. She will take any excuse to put herself off revealing herself, and whenever you think she's getting an ick or whatever, you come back to the thing she doesn't want to talk about.

This way you create a loop that both negatively rewards(takes pain away) her for listening to you instead of talking about herself and positively rewards her for talking about stuff she's sensitive to. The only hard part is reading her in order to find out what questions she feels weird about you asking(that she won't outright refuse but also visably will appear externally uncomfortable with). The whole point is that she's the one who feels in control, otherwise it doesn't work and she won't feel safe enough. Women are like cats. If she brings it up, then that's ideal.


You can, of course, use this for evil rather than getting women to genuinely care about you too much to abandon you, but why should you do that? Go play therapist with no ethical stops preventing you from doing relationships with your client and have fun. Reap the fruit of doing so-called emotional labor.

>>82434355
usually people that believe in random evil acts over causality are dishonest, but whatever.

>>82434394
incels are predictably violent, i'm saying they attack random women. there's a reason people avoid incels.

>incel violence
Huh? Incels stay at home, they're not the "dominant" abusers a lot of women flock to.

>>82434391
*you come back to the thing she DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO TALK ABOUT.

Just keep doing that over and over and using it to pace the conversation and make her feel like she's the burden for not aptly knowing rather than you for asking.

>>82434391
Thank you psychological Anon, I am going to put this into practice. I have some subjects in mind already to play mind games with.

>>82434406
guess you haven't been able to keep up with the conversation. at this point your stupidity is the only thing that keeps me entertained outside of this monotony.

of course people will violently attack insufferable people. is that a surprise?

>>82434456
why would it be a surprise if incels are violent? that's the entire problem.

>>82434467
because usually people without social awareness are surprised at random behaviors. im guessing you are just autistic? giving you the benefit of the doubt here.

>>82434503
nobody was talking about random behaviors. incel violence is obvious to social awareness people.

>>82434525
difference between social awareness and cognative bias. they are often mistakenly confused.

>>82434543
do incels confuse them or something? i was talking about how violent they are.

>>82434550
no not really, thats why I have to explain to you what the difference is. im afraid my over simplified explanation is not sinking in you clearly.

>>82434564
>no not really
but you brought it up, explain yourself. why do incels confuse them if they would be violent either way?

>>82434582
can you make your thoughts more coherent before you post? you seem to reverse the cause and effect and make the action without condition outside of an imaginary bias you claim incels have.

>>82434626
i identified the correct cause and effect. which part were you struggling with in particular, i can probably assist you.

>>82434641
not really thats why i had to point out your mistakes in the first place and correct you accordingly. What assistance would you offer me exactly?

>>82434680
>not really
delusional. you were just struggling like two minutes ago so you have no basis for disagreeing.

>>82434694
you just didnt care to read through it because it didnt provide you a suffice platform to make your basis, you mean.

>>82434719
nobody was talking about platforms, you just didn't understand the problem of incels being violent.

>>82434748
>you didnt understand
strange this entire time I tried to explain it to you in different ways and you still struggle to comprehend the reading material.

>>82434768
any matter that has been designed for reading wouldn't be different, just based on the definition. if you are struggling with any specific part of why incels are violent i would help you understand maybe.

>>82434784
>that has been designed for reading wouldnt be any different
some people take the definition based off the keyword than the context its used in, already im pointing out crucial examples in your flaws. You can give it a try and explain and I will correct you where you went wrong. Hopefully hands on learning would finally get the information to sink in.

>>82434858
Which part did you need assistance with learning? And I am curious why you haven't learned it yet, have you never gone outside to see them do it?

>>82434868
why are you confused on how to begin your explanation. Just go by the main point and work from there if its too much for you to organize coherently. Like I said, there is no shame in making mistakes thats why I will assess your post and critique it accordingly to how accurate the material is displayed.

>>82434886
When did you say anything about shame?

>>82434899
I thought by implying its okay to speak your thoughts while critiquing accordingly would indicate reassurence. Ill wait until you are comfortable enough to share. I wont force it upon you.

>>82434926
If you were talking about shame it seems like you deleted your post from earlier.

The female is a hopeless creature that men project beauty onto. All beauty really comes from men, it is an internal phenomena plastered onto a woman, it means nothing without his perception. All women are erotic libidinous automatons, doing whatever it is they feel in the moment and never asking why, never considering if they ought to do something or ought to feel something.

it's time to put this silly exercise of compassion towards the female sex to rest. They don't understand it. Not only do they not feel it for you, they do not understand it when men give compassion onto them. Let us pull away the falsities now. No more fairy tales, no more high hopes for them.

What they are is what they will stay. It's what they LIKE to be. They satisfy their immediate desires whenever they have them. They are as imbalanced spiritually as any human can be and all the consequences are heaped onto any male within 40 feet of them. It's a swinish sort of a life, and there's no freedom in it, but since when does a bird need freedom from its libido? If it's good enough for animals, it's "good enough" for women, and they seem rather "pleased" with themselves.

It's time we all moved on. Resigned ourselves to the wrongs of nature, the wrongs of state, and the wrongs of women. Do what we must, act how we will, control ourselves and the things in the locus of our power, and consider everything else irrelevant. Discomfort is inevitable. Suffering is a choice.

>>82434944
wdym, reread my post.

>>82434960
I just reread it and if you were talking about shame before then that post doesn't exist anymore. If you were struggling so much before it might have been that you couldn't figure out how you wanted to respond, because it doesn't say that you said anything about shame before.

>>82434959
so even before puberty they are whores. how black pilling.

>>82434981
That's why most men start having sex in they teens. It's just really weird if you still know any virgins past the age of 20.

>>82434972
what deleted post? I dont see a digit assigned post crossed out. eventually you will understand it, hopefully.

>>82434868
>>82434886
>>82434899
>>82434926
>>82434944
>>82434960
>>82434972
Don't let this diversion distract you from the fact that modern females think 25 bmi is okay and average. And they really really REALLY want you to think that as well.

>>82434994
yes unfortunately that is true but I dont have the heart to engage in random sex no matter how vile the opposite gender is and appearing to be the bad boy outs me as a cringy poser

>>82434995
so now you're gaslighting yourself into believing that you never said anything about shame in the first place

>>82435011
Two rules to live by in society:
1. No fat chicks
2. No incels

>>82435027
implications vs outright saying the key words, once again proving my point on how you need obvious signs to help you think. otherwise you become mentally lost and dissasociate.

>>82435040
no you didn't say you implied, you said "like i said." are you a virgin?

>>82435050
ill get to that after we are finished clearing up your misunderstanding. please remain on topic.

>>82435062
the topic was incels until you started ad hommingmaxxing. are you an incel?

>>82435083
you consider... having a topic that someone doesnt agree with you on as an ad hommin? starting to map out your mentality a bit. so far predictable. Yes we talked about incels and in that topic we have something called sub topics. right now im answering your question about how shame was brought into this. not entertained by your own deviation?

>>82435113
at your age i wasn't struggling so much with basic aspects of why incels are violent. which makes me think you might be biased on account of being an incel am i correct?

>>82435128
a regretful past isnt easy to admit, props to you atleast. but something stands out in you despite that. you are ashamed of leaning in and asking the why. which makes me think your conclusion is an opinion rather than anything closely resembling logic

>>82435166
my conclusion is based on the observed premises. are you an incel?

>>82435172
you seem more of an internalizer therefore I hardly doubt that. if I was or wasnt what would change?

>>82435185
*therefore I doubt that
sorry even i admit when to fix my own mistakes >>82435172

>>82435185
>if i was or wasn't
are you claiming that you don't know? curious. that would explain a lot.

>>82435207
hm? is this a feeble attempt to get me to answer by appealing to the competitive instincts again? oh, can you atleast answer what difference it would makes i can reply appropriately? or do you even struggle with your own approach to a conversation

>>82435241
i think you already answered that's why i posted my understanding of your answer.

>>82435241
*make so I can
had to fix another error, go on continue.
>>82435207

>>82435253
keyphrase: I think.

indicating uncertainty, therefore you would be incorrect on your assumption. given that your comment has given enough leeway to decipher that for myself. now, do you know what difference the answer will make? or are you so uncertain about your approach.

>>82435275
>if something indicates uncertainty, therefore it is incorrect
how so? you have never taken a logic class, it looks like.

>>82435288
>your comment gave enough leeway to decipher that for myself

leaving out key clues on purpose to create a false mental box. goodtry

>>82435308
nobody was talking about boxes. somebody earlier in this thread said that if something indicates uncertainty, even if it's correct, it is therefore incorrect.

>>82435327
and im saying you are blowing it out of proportion, once again assuming the basis of a comment based on strong key words over subtle context. Once again disproving your claim of being able to logically deduce anything.

>>82435421
the key difference is that you claimed that i would be incorrect on my assumption if something i said indicated uncertainty. so even if i was correct, your key would say it is incorrect despite being correct. are you an incel?

op makes a fair point
I kept running in my head that you only need 2 men to fertilize 10 women
but then I realized you need more men to cooperate building civilization with labor in the first place

>>82435548
only 1 man builds civilization for every 1000 men who just sit around doing nothing.

>>82435594
civilization is already built anon
my point was if they were settling from scratch in a village

your 1 man theory is just a lament you're in a digital age

>>82435438
circular reasoning doesnt logically make a claim to be certain, you would eventually loop yourself until you get mentally dizzy and start getting careless. so before I answer, how will this change your approach since this question comes with an obvious ulterior motivd

>>82435643
those 100 men would help that one man put together the blueprints and hold that mans dream. you are incorrect. how a man would accumulate willing participants is by reciprocating them. which society and women seems to forget doing

>THAT INCEL CHUD IS KILLING WOMEN WITH HIS MISOGYNISTIC POSTS IN 4CHAN
Do women really?

>>82435643
my bad, >>82435666
replied accidentally the wrong comment

this was ment for

>>82435666

ingenuity is meaninglessness without cooperate

>>82435643
you don't really need those men though, since they don't do anything.

>>82435655
what did you mean by "motivd"?
i wasn't talking about any circular reasoning. you just falsely assumed that i was incorrect in my assumption. avoiding the question is still an answer.

>>82435682
exactly if anything the helpers are what puts that 1 mans dream into motion

>>82435692
so you are already getting frustrated that im not taking your bait which inturn made you fall for your own bait. curious. and i wasnt even trying, I was hoping to nudge you on a more genuine discussion.

>>82435716
there's nothing genuine about an incel. the very concept is an oxymoron.

>>82435724
based on your reasoning as a self assumed default of truth? delusional.

>>82435734
there's a good reason why the concept doesn't actually mean what you think it means.

>>82435751
that much is certain, I forgot its whatever is convenient for your prefered ingroup

>>82435786
it's actually an inconvenient truth, its the very basis of the blackpill which is why its so hard to swallow for the lazy and the uninformed

I love my wife! She's sweet and great.

holy autism, the thread

>>82433944 (OP)
I act hostile, distant, and unpredictable and bitches still want to sort me into "emotional tampon" role even though I am utterly useless for this and make no attempt at satisfying it. They persist, however. I just cheat on them but the idea that 3 to 5 women at a time all think of me as their potential beta bux oofy doofy schlubby hubby is insane

>>82435867
Come back when you have like 40 women at the same time. It gets crazier.

>>82435011
you're right, 25 bmi isn't acceptable. it's at least 10 too low

>>82435890
I don't have time for that plus I get bored of them. That 3-5 I see every week or two is about the most I can possibly sustain, keeping fucking Forty on the hook all at once is nuts but props to you if you can do it.

>>82435903
After juggling more than 3 chicks it's just exhausting desu. I went up to 4-5 once and it was more trouble than it was worth.

Lending a female help (or favoritism in general) just for 'being a female' is terrible karma and will negatively impact human progress.

Internalize this. Realize misogyny simply isn't misogynistic enough.

You have to revel in the bitterness and nihilism. The 'blackpill' is the perfect essence that loosens the heart from the clutches of the so called "instinct" to provide for the parasitic feminine. That's why institutions counter-signal against it. psych-evol dogmatists will seethe.

>>82433944 (OP)
Unrelated to the topic at hand but I love that artwork

>>82434959
>Not only do they not feel it for you, they do not understand it when men give compassion onto them.
Holy shit, is that why they hate it when men are kind to them?

>>82437211
they hate it because it's dishonest. men are evil creatures and it would make no sense for them to be kind to anyone.