Thread 82548278

I have an announcement to make I'm officially a retard!

>>82548278 (OP)
What does rightism even mean in 2025?

>>82548291
You see the Blue Square and the far right bottom purple square? That's the people you hate

>>82548317
Why would I hate people who have been misguided by billionaires? That's what it means? "I want to be hated?"

thats nice, now you can have sex with a cute tranny

>>82548327
Well as long as we don't violate each others NAPs

hello my fellow left centers
i was expecting authleft but whatever, too much anprim in me or something
this is ironic because i used to be a reactionary couple years ago but nowadays i despise chuds and right wing cuckservative bullshit, hello my fellow socdems

>>82548433
Total Blue Square death Op here

>>82548278 (OP)
Everyone hates libright, but they're literally correct about everything.

>>82548433
greetings brother
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Bill_of_Rights

>>82548433
Read an economics book, you'll shift to purple

>>82548449
>how to destroy the country and make the working class poorer 101
kek

>>82548453
How would guaranteeing housing, jobs, medical care, and education make everyone poorer?

>>82548453
read one, it made me pro-regulations and pro-statism
libertarianism is a meme for little kids, dont worry youll grow out of it once you reach 21

>>82548468
Because Republicans will ram it into the ground and steal its funding for wars and blame Democrats for building a system that they could raid, just like with social security.

>>82548497
Simply declare blue square people to be a terrorist group

>>82548278 (OP)
>look up the politics of all my favourite poets, authors, philosophers
huh, makes sense

social democracy FTW

>>82548541
what philosophers are those

>>82548468
>How would guaranteeing housing, jobs, medical care, and education make everyone poorer?
Because the government(which has no resources and needs to extract them from society) can't magically provide these things to everyone.
A job guarantee is especially fucking retarded because the government is shit at allocating resources and would pay people to do the most unproductive things, wasting real resources, lowering economic output and increases prices.
>>82548497
Social security is bankrupt.
If you're a zoomer and defend SS, you're an absolute cuck for boomers.
If you were allowed to invest that money yourself even in basic bitch etfs like spy, you would have an incredibly large amount of money at the end. Instead SS just wastes the money and inflation devalues it.
>>82548481
>read one, it made me pro-regulations and pro-statism
You probably read some leftist "economics" without reading the other side.
>libertarianism is a meme for little kids, dont worry youll grow out of it once you reach 21
lol I've heard this same exact retarded talking point for like 15 years now.
Get new material you child

>>82548545
more like social poverty

>>82548608
Simply tax billionaires then so that they're not billionaires anymore. Then the government will have the money for those programs.

>>82548546
Big fan of Camus tbf
I know what you're going to say, zip it

these are the results of the last time we had a compass thread if anyone is curious. we're probably the only board that is overwhelmingly leftist.

>>82548705
Authright BTFO

>>82548661
nice i take influence from a lot of negative consequentalism/negative utilitarianism
and also some schopenhauer
>>82548705
average r9k is a hiki on neetbux, they arent gonna vote for a right winger that will get rid of neetbux

>>82548654
>Simply tax billionaires
lmao, that doesn't even cover the national debt. It's peanuts.
Even if you could get the full value of their stock values(you'd likely get maybe 30% if you sold slowly) it would end up being a one time payment to each person of like $1000.
Why do you people pretend billionaires have unlimited money?
>Then the government will have the money for those programs.
lmao

>>82548705
>loser board has loser political opinions
makes sense

>>82548758
it is a compelling correlation

>>82548278 (OP)
>I'm officially a retard!
What? How is that possible?

>>82548705
this is strange because I see almost no commies here

>>82549105
to be fair theres only two respondents halfway up the authority axis. its mostly moderates who see some value in guiding authority, which is a reasonable conclusion for a failed-at-life robot to come to.

First time taking the test sincerely

I want to become a cyborg and have sex with my formerly MtF post-human slime girlfriend

>>82548278 (OP)
You're not a retard tho, you're simply an eleutheromaniac.

>>82549528
please stop wasting my oxygen, you're unworthy of it

>>82548619
social poverty is better than private p(r)o(v/p)erty

>>82549660
We will find a way to make all oxygen a commodity soon and resentful plebs like you will drop like flies

>>82548278 (OP)
You're in the only non retard square doebiet

>>82548278 (OP)
>choose all the anti corporation options
>get moved from mid lib right to mid lib left
Lmfao?

>>82549664
lol go live in north korea then bootlicker

>>82549796
The test is incredibly biased towards the left and seriously outdated.
The guy who made the test 20 years ago is probably rolling cash from the ad revenue.
He managed to brainwash a generation.

>>82549880
have fun licking the boots of corporations and the worlds 50 richest people

but north korea? really? when i say social democracy i mean the nordic countries, not dictatorships that arent even real social countries

>>82549906
When you say social democracy you say unsustainable bureaucratic ponzi scheme. You're probably an American so I can't fault you for not being familiar with such a hellscape.

>>82548278 (OP)
no that's actually the only non-retarded quadrant. if you want a better quiz you could take this one though: https://taxedbrass.github.io/tbpolcomp/

>>82549948
social democracy does not equal soviet socialism, it means free healthcare, housing assistance, better workers rights through publicly owned companies, less push from corporations, motivation that isnt just profit for shareholders, etc

>>82549893
I want to take it again and document my choices I feel really confused it put me in lib left. I was solid lib right when I was younger, the only thing that changed was I'm more extremist and I hate corporations and the elite.

>>82549964
Like I said, beautiful ideas that sound great on paper until you actually live in such a shithole where the median age is approaching 50 and the retirement age and social security will all cease to exist within my generation.

>>82549906
>have fun licking the boots of corporations
but I don't?
I live my life and their products benefit me.
I don't even have to use them.
You want to abolish all private ownership, turning the working class into actual slaves lmao
You're the biggest cocksucking bootlicker imaginable.
>when i say social democracy
You implied you want to get rid of private property. That's obviously not what social democracy is.
>i mean the nordic countries
You mean ones that have the freest markets on earth with the strongest private property rights? lol

>>82549964
>it means free healthcare, housing assistance
these arent free
you pay much higher taxes(with lower salaries) for them

>>82548278 (OP)
Either this peice of shit test sucks dick or I legitimately have kept my positions pretty much the same while the overton window has shifted around me.
I vote R currently but am going to start voting L as soon as D stops being an existential communist threat.

>>82550120
>Abolishing private property turns workers into slaves
I knew this thread would be full of retards

>>82548753
I know that, but people will fall for bullshit strongman solutions and blame minorities, so we may as well do something good with that. Plus, billionaire money can do some things. We could actually build enough homes.