>>82775489 (OP)
Ultimately it comes back to gynocentrism. If you can't please a woman it's supposed to be a negative thing because most people base their self worth around female validation.
The penis is what makes a man not a woman so the less of it you have the less you are a man and the more you are a woman. So I don't respect small guys less but I see them as more women than men
>>82775760
ok but you don't really know though. if you saw me showering at the gym you'd think I was pretty small but I'm a grower and am quite a bit larger than average
so you'd think I was more of a woman cause I'm not getting hard in the gym
>>82775760 >but I see them as more women than men
I guess that makes sense in a way but also does it change how you treat the small penised men, now that you consider them more female?
>>82776101
I doubt people treat you that differently most people don't even know what you have. Where men go wrong is thinking being manly is the be all end all, you're not less of a person because you're less of a man
>>82776288
I am not. My balls will sometimes get pushed into the groin area and then it looks like nothing is there because my dick is that small. I wish I was trolling
'Not only were small, flaccid penises considered to be the ideal, but it's also made very clear in Ancient Greek art the large, erect phallus was considered to be the exact opposite'.
>>82775511
Notice how this was not the case until the 19th amendment, which in an of itself was enabled solely by the softening and dumbing down of men by the industrial revolution.