>>82803276
>The first was a realisation that I was wasting my life
see, i think your whole philosophy is contradictory because its ALL a game
EVERYTHING is a game. girls, making money in real life, dating, sex, power. its ALL a game with rules that reward things and punishes other, with winners and losers
you just want to sacrifice your videogames for real life GAMES, which is fine, i just dont know if its optimal
soon all jobs will be automated by ai robots. the whole concept of trading your labour for income is soon going to be automated. for example going to college for computer programming right is a 100% waste of time, ai does it better and will always do it better. the same will be true for all jobs soon enough
it would seem to me that life is meant to be enjoyed, and it would seem like the outside world is sort of conceptually doomed because of ai taking over all jobs
>I can't say it's made me feel any better. If anything, they make me a worse person
really? gaming saved my life and i think if i didnt have videogames id have killed myself, my life would be miserable. how would having fun and making progress make you feel jaded? how does that make any sense? it sounds like you are blaming videogames for things they didnt even do? i dont appreciate this unjustified videogame slander
>When you play a game, you're letting someone else (the developer) determine how you should progress
more of this delusional self-contradicting philosophy. the outside world is a game you are FORCED to play and your stats in it are assigned at birth, like looks, height, race, parents, childhood. this is a game with clear winning and losing thresholds (having lots of sex and love, money, power, children, success vs being a virgin homeless loser)
you're delusional my friendo. i just dont think you appreciate that enjoyment of videogames is built on philosophically sturdy grounds