>>82811697
ok so basically we have to set up a few things before
first of all is that the law of identity exists, and this we cannot prove it because it would require to already accept it to try and reason to it , same for the other 2 laws of logic.
we also need to note that said laws are not really trying to be distinct from one another but are describing the fundamental working of reality ; the structure of existance, or we could say of being.
so , the first thing to note is that accepting Logic means to accept it's universality , that is that there is not one object that is not subject to it.
so , Logic is a universal and improvable principle, but where is divinity in all of this ? and what do you mean by proof if you can't even prove Logic ?
well , the thing is i don't prove God, i prove that God and Logic are the same, you're free to choose or reject logic , even it's completely stupid to reject it ( and you have to do it without reason ).
for the first question, we know that Logic is universal , so it's also there at the beginning of the causal chain. So logic is always here , and thus here at the beginning. ( the causal chain having to have a first mover yadi yada ) even if there is no real causal chain , the fact that logic and being are inseperable makes logic the first thing to exist , one cannot exist without the other because they are the same thing.
and remember , we are talking logic as the very structure of reality , as of pure existence.
since this is the case , logic is not determined by any prior cause. but since logic is not random ( since it can't be changed in any way since it's a universal principle of existence, like how could you even change A=A (( you may change the expression of the rule , but not th reality itself )) ) well the reason of the causal chain is neither determined by pure law of determinism nor randomness. in other words , choice. Logic has chosen. can't go farther , comment too long
