>>82824343
I don't argue that they don't push the board rightwards. Re-read the argument:
>During the onions party leak, more than half of all jannies and mods were transgender or far left. If you're wondering why this is a far left space, that's why.
This space, /r9k/, where you can be banned for racism, and 4chan as a whole, where racism is against the rules except on /b/.
>I wish I lived in the fantasy world you're posting from because one look at /pol/ shows this place has gone so far to the right that they're calling Hitler a socialist.
You then make the argument that rightism on /pol/ means the argument that "this place" is refuted, but this wasn't the argument at all. That's your mistake.
>>82823991
>/pol/ is not a hivemind. Click any thread and there are a lot of dissenting voices. Here's one praising communism: >>>/pol/519071835
Just humoring you, I show that not even /pol/ is a hivemind that is "so far to the right..." because there is dissent even in the thread you refer to. You then make the argument that the loudest voice... therefore far right, but this isn't the point, the only argument is against your initial statement, and that "this place," 4chan on the whole and /r9k/, not /pol/ alone, is far left. If 4chan were far right, then the board for lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgenders would not exist. You cannot point to one instance to prove that the website as a whole is your view, in the same way I can't point to /lgbt/ alone to prove 4chan is leftist.
>And you can argue the same for the right-wing types, but like I said, you don't apply the same nuance
I do. I consider that they all contribute to rightism, but on here and even on /pol/ it isn't enough to say the board or the website as a whole is, as you said, "so far to the right..."
The contradiction is in your head.