>>82841096
>>82841352
>>82841424
So you are flatly wrong with your claims. We see a slight trend downwards until 2021, but this represents an increase in teen and adolescent homicide, and this represents the increased proportion if brown children and adolescents. Much more young people in the UK are brown, with London's youth being majority brown, obviously the majority of crime would situate itself here.
(cont)
>>82841470
Yes you keep on with using kindergarten insults, is that really all you have left? That's amusing but not really an argument.
>If one participated in it, becoming corrupt, that would make one a hypocrite.
No, corrupt in this case is your value judgement, use your braincells.
>If one made a statement against technology, while taking active part in said technology, that would make them hypocritical at best, morally bankrupt at worst, or just intellectually dishonest in the middle.
No it would not. If the intent is to lower ot eliminate technological usage for the world as a whole, then if using technology is the way to do it, it isn't hypocritical. The aim is not
>I should stop
It's
>The world should use it less
In your individual restraint, you lower the total usage only for yourself and only by a very marginal amount globally, but if you use it to push anti-technology sentiment to achieve your aim, which is lower global usage, then it isn't hypocritical.
It is similar to those concerned with carbon like Greta using boats. If she eliminated her usage of carbon, it would contrarily make it harder to lower global carbon usage. You are just an imbecile.
