Thread 82847010

>try to make society somewhat better
>"WHOA NOW, YOU CANT DO THAT SON YOU GOTTA MAKE US SHAREHOLDERS AS MUCH MONEY AS POSSIBLE AND YOU ARE LEGALLY DUTY BOUND TO DO SO"
Wtf was the supreme court thinking?

>>82847010 (OP)
except his ideas were eventually implemented for a lot of the technology economy. they got treated well and look where that led us (maybe because only some jobs are really money makers, idk)

>>82847010 (OP)
Shareholders own the company and therefore management has a duty to serve the shareholders. This isn't complicated. Would you like it if your bank decided to donate your savings account to charity?

Probably how they were going to spend the generous donation from the dodge brothers that they received for no particular reason.
America has never been a free country. Goes all the way back to George Washington. First thing he does after getting elected? He raised a military to kill American citizens. Why? Because they owed taxes. Democracy is objectively the worst form of government. No standards beyond be popular, but even that's not necessary if turn out is poor.

that's why politics is war, if you want to protect the environment lets say there's greed at play it's supposed to be a conflict between desire and what's right

>>82847033
>he thinks your bank literally holds your money instead of it being an "insured" abstraction that is immediately invested elsewhere
>he also thinks youre a shareholder in a bank for having a savings rather than volunteering to be a product
Oh nonono

>>82847033
Thats literally what they are doing. By making interest free loans dependent on a high Dei score they are effectively running a charity while torpedoing anyo companies with a moral backbone. Everyone is leveraged to the gills, the only way to stay competitive is by accepting the free money. If you don't someone else will take free money and undercut the prices of your goods or services.

>>82847067
nooooo like something i don't know about

>>82847088
so you've chosen the leftist side?

>>82847086
Well, no. The bank isn't donating your savings account. You can also look at the books for any publicly traded bank and see that their loans aren't interest free. None of what you said actually makes sense to me.

>>82847108
then don't get a loan
seems like a skill issue
bankrupt fag

stop trying to win the conflict

>>82847126
I uh, I don't know what the fuck you're talking about. I don't need a loan. You're the one talking about interest free DEI loans, not me.

>>82847147
sorry I was butting in

>>82847153
Oh you're a funny guy anon keep up the good work

>>82847100
i mean more, in the vein or spirit of their being one picture of the world or many pictures of the world

>>82847178
there* i have been mixing them up more as i get older

>>82847010 (OP)
Don't look up the original Dodge logo

>>82847010 (OP)
He used the wrong kind of corporate charter if that was his objective.
It would be bad if Mothers Against Drunk Driving suddenly became a for profit business selling HVAC equipment, the people who gave them money would be pissed. If Berkshire Hathaway suddenly decided their mission was now to prevent people from getting behind the wheel stoned on weed people who invested money in them would be pissed
Stay in your lane

>>82847010 (OP)
He was looking to undercut all the competition and establish a monopoly in labor. This would not have been much better.

>>82847010 (OP)
And that was the moment he became anti-semitic.

>>82847010 (OP)
>YOU GOTTA MAKE US SHAREHOLDERS AS MUCH MONEY AS POSSIBLE AND YOU ARE LEGALLY DUTY BOUND TO DO SO"
No, you fucking retard. The CEO is legally bound to do what's best for the company from his own point of view, not to maximize shareholder profits.
Ford just tried to take money that was not his and give it away to random people. That's called theft.

>WOAH YOU GOTTA REJECT THE BETTER MAN THAT HURTS MY FEELINGS OR SOMETHING
How did timmy get away with this