Thread 82875687

Lots of robots want younger gfs.

Are there any fembots who'd prefer a younger bf but also want to be submissive and have a bf who takes care of them?

>>82875687 (OP)
its an interesting idea but not sure how feasible it would actually be all things considered

>>82876342
Yeah in order for it to work you would need to find a moid who A: is relatively successful/significantly more successful than his cohort and B: has a preference for older women but isn't into mommy shit. I'd imagine that combo is rare.

>>82876391
If she's mid to late 20s she could find a moid studying cs, engineering, or finance at a good college and ensure he ends up with a high paying job. Agree with point B though

>>82876421
>studying cs
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>82875687 (OP)
I'm 22 and make over 100k a year at an Engineering Firm.
Ever since I was a freshmen in High School, I've been hyper obsessed with marrying a woman who is similar to the idea portrayed in this picture.
I just want someone to watch pre-2010s anime with and go to conventions and we can pretend like we still live in a better world.

>>82876469
genuinely snickered irl when I read that same part. this immediately came to mind.

>>82876511
>Makes 100k
Proof or it didn't happen

>>82876619
I am genuinely a threat actor now because the CS market is shit for new grads and I need to make money somehow. I have a few frens who actually managed to break into the job market and constantly complain about jeets, women, and management being useless at best and actively hindering their work at worst.
I remember being a kid getting into programming and talking with fellow nerdy young dudes online, expecting the job market to be like that once I eventually grew up. How disappointing can reality be?

>>82876675
Yeah hold on let me just attach my paystub real quick.
>>82876469
>>82876619
Yeah true, I don't know why people think CS is still profitable at all. That is why I'm happy I went with EE.
The calculus really filters out all the CS midwits.

>>82876707
don't most CS degrees literally require calc? The one at my uni does at least

>>82876707
I had to take calc classes thoughbeit, but yeah engineering requires a lot more math courses afaik.

>>82876619
>>82876705
CS is basically now where all other STEM degrees already have been for at least a decade. You can easily find PhDs/postdocs in chemistry, physics, etc. who can't get any quality work. Any dumbass newgrad hopping into a job that pays 300k TC was never sustainable.

>>82876761
I was never really in it for the money, though that was attractive. I genuinely enjoy programming and have since I was a kid. I regularly contribute to FOSS projects (Most notably some KDE applications) and help package/maintain linux packages.
Sometimes I wish I was alive during John Carmack's days when the industry was filled with people who were genuinely passionate about programming instead of today where it's just seen as a high paying job.

>too dumb for Electrical/Mechanical Engineering
>Electrician trade schools are a meme where I live
>Cybersecurity/anything involving CS is a meme also
So the only options I have are becoming an Electronics Technician, which probably means I'll be working with a Jeet fixing phones or something. Lame.
Or, going to an aviation trade school and becoming an airplane mechanic
Either way, I'm fucked. I probably should have gone to college earlier but I didn't know what I wanted to study.

>>82876817
>when the industry was filled with people who were genuinely passionate about programming instead of today where it's just seen as a high paying job.
I feel you. But in this day and age money is truly all that matters. Money=survivability. And trust me, if I could make art for a living I wouldn't even touch trades or STEM at all. I know my limits.

>>82876725
>>82876755
Maybe some schools require Calc 1 but I've never seen a CS Major require Calc 2 and 3.
Definitely no math higher than that.
"Computer" "Science" is the most bullshit name ever too lol. Its not really about computers and its not really a science either.
Engineers, Electrical Engineers like myself, we learn how to program machines too.
I had to learn Assembly, CS Majors learn Java, Python, C++, other midwit languages like that.
I can basically do anything a CS Major can do plus way more and I actually got job offers.

>>82876961
I was required to take calc 1 and 2. The name is a meme, yeah. The name is a holdover from when it was a more experimental field several decades ago.
>Engineers, Electrical Engineers like myself, we learn how to program machines too.
I have done some limited embedded stuff with a UART flasher and while it does require some programming knowledge it's very different from software design. It's more akin to basic scripting rather than architecting large systems. You really aren't ever dealing with large, multi-layered abstractions. But then again, most devs aren't doing that either, so fair enough.
>I had to learn Assembly, CS Majors learn Java, Python, C++, other midwit languages like that.
C++ is not a midwit language lmao(but it still sucks). Also, assembly is extremely simple. Anyone with an IQ over 115 can become proficient in a week or two. I went from not knowing any assembly to having a functional x86 asm->C decompiler in couple weeks just casually as a side project.

>>82877046
>C++ is not a midwit language lmao
Yes it is. Its the midwit version of C.
The only two programming languages that anyone needs to know are x86 Assembly and C. Literally everything is built upon these on some level.
>it's very different from software design
You're right it is. Engineers had to use languages like Assembly and C to make your computer for you so that you could do your software design on it.
Software Design is much easier than embedded systems. You need embedded systems to do software design.
>It's more akin to basic scripting
Your average 14 year old script kiddie is not writing anything akin to UNIX.
>assembly is extremely simple. Anyone with an IQ over 115 can become proficient in a week or two
Most CS majors dont have an IQ above 100 so this is where the problems begin. Its the midwit "engineering" degree.

>>82877119
>Yes it is. Its the midwit version of C.
You outed yourself as knowing very little about both of them. C++(as it was originally intended) builds useful abstractions on top of C. You can write C code and compile it with pretty much any C++ compiler.
>Software Design is much easier than embedded systems.
Depends heavily on what the application is in both cases.
>You need embedded systems to do software design.
Yeah that's called an abstraction. We use them to save time and labor. It's much more reasonable to write printf("hello world) than bringing specific pins to a HIGH state on a monitor to achieve the same thing.
>Your average 14 year old script kiddie is not writing anything akin to UNIX.
the UNIX certified family of operating systems are not embedded operating systems.
>Most CS majors dont have an IQ above 100 so this is where the problems begin. Its the midwit "engineering" degree.
TRVTH NVKE

>>82877251
>You outed yourself as knowing very little about both of them. C++(as it was originally intended) builds useful abstractions on top of C. You can write C code and compile it with pretty much any C++ compiler.
I never said anything on the contrary to this. I said that C++ is the midwit verison of C because it is. Those "useful abstractions" you talk about are crutches that midwits require to write their code easier.
>Depends heavily on what the application is in both cases.
Not really, the average software engineer does not know the intricacies of the system he's using. He just writes his little program in Java or Python and calls it a day.
>Yeah that's called an abstraction. We use them to save time and labor. It's much more reasonable to write printf("hello world) than bringing specific pins to a HIGH state on a monitor to achieve the same thing.
Yeah, its a crutch used by shitty programmers who don't actually know how their computers work and have no desire to learn the machine.
>the UNIX certified family of operating systems are not embedded operating systems.
Uh huh, but UNIX was written in Assembly and C. The average script kiddie is not writing UNIX, they're making shitty little hacks for Windows.
>TRVTH NVKE
Glad we agree on this.

It was funny when you tried to "Gatcha" me on the C++ thing. Run along little CS Major, go use your abstraction nonsense and leave the real coding to Engineers.

>>82877387
Okay you got me with the first one but this bait is just horrible.

>>82877399
Its not really bait. Its a somewhat complicated belief that I have.
Do I think that C++ existing is a bad thing? Not necessarily.
The problem is that C++ was made to make C programmers lives easier, not noobs.
This happens in lots of fields, things get easier overtime because the veterans want an improved workflow.
New people come into the field and all they know is this new workflow, they don't know the ACTUAL process, just the simplified one made for veterans.

If I had my way, high schools all across the United States would still be making their students learn C and writing their code on actual pencil and paper before ever touching a computer.
Just like the CS Majors of the 20th century had to do. Actually learn the material.
Instead, we live in a time of abstraction, IDEs, Youtube tutorials, AI Assistants, Stackoverflow, etc etc etc.

To sum up my point: Veterans come in, obtain master level knowledge in a field, they want to make their lives easier so they simplify the process.
Next generation comes in to the field, they study with the veterans, the veterans are all doing it the easy way now (because they understand the hard way).
New generation only knows the easy way, never had to learn the hard way, the entire quality of the field goes down once the veterans die.

We can see this happening in tons of fields today as the old generation retires or dies. So yeah, go learn Assembly and C and actually learn how a computer works. I emplore you.

>>82877612
Ah yeah I can agree with you there. I've always recommended to internet frens who are interested in coding to start with C and as of late, to never touch AI. It really is a problem when retards just start abusing inheritance and abstraction ad infinitum and make a rats nest of a codebase. I had to learn lower level stuff by necessity because I started out trying to learn about binary exploitation.
>Yeah that's called an abstraction. We use them to save time and labor. It's much more reasonable to write printf("hello world) >than bringing specific pins to a HIGH state on a monitor to achieve the same thing.
Yeah, its a crutch used by shitty programmers who don't actually know how their computers work and have no desire to learn the machine.
This was just so hyperbolic that I thought you were baiting.

>>82877693
I started with low level stuff because I'm autistic and always want to start things from "The Beginning" rather than just jump into them top-down.
This has caused many issues in my life because I make it harder for myself doing this, but whatever, its just how I like doing it.
So when I was 10 and wanted to start coding, I started on a Commodore 16 that my Great-Uncle gave me.
I thought, "Ah, I should start with Assembly before moving on to higher level languages."

So I followed in the footsteps of people who came before me, started on a commodre 16 learning Assembly from a physical book.
Then I jumped a bit to a Windows XP computer where I started learning C and learned about making mods for Gold Source games like Half-Life.

Then I finally made it back to my main computer, which ran Windows 7 at the time. That is when I started learning C++ and Java.
Coincidentally, that is also around the time I entered High School and was able to take a Java Programming class in School. Was kind of fun.

I know its autistic. Most people start with the current thing. They jump into C++ or Java or Python. This is called "Top-Down" learning where you pick up on things as you go.
I always did "Bottom-Up" learning where for some reason, for all things, I've always felt inclined to start from "The Beginning".
When I was learning Japanese for example, I didn't just start out with learning words or learning important phrases. I started out with learning the alphabet.
Then, after learning the alphabet, I got super obsessed with learning all the grammar rules and different intricacies of the language.
Then finally after some time, I started learning the Kanji and conversational japanese.

Meanwhile, most people just dive right into the conversational stuff, learn it more naturally, and generally have an easier time than I did.
But hey, at least I know all the grammar rules and stuff I guess.

>>82877802
The concept of a top down approach to learning seems fundamentally retarded to me. Learning the basic building blocks seems like the logical approach to mastering a subject, not autistic.

What a bunch of retarded little faggots in this thread

>>82877890
Well the original topic OP posted was retarded so I'm happy we were able to take over this stupid thread about women when some more interesting discussion.

>>82877868
Ehh, its how most people learn. I think I have a better example.
When I was learning to play the guitar, I went to classes. The first lesson was about the individual strings, finger placement, stuff like that.
The second lesson started jumping right into chords and progressions and learning how to play songs that already exist.
I went home and started diving in the history of the guitar, how the strings are made, why combining them makes certain chords, things like that.
Things that you dont really need to know just to play the thing, I just wanted to know as much as possible.
I didn't want to learn just how to play chords, I wanted to learn why the chords even exist in the first place and how people came to these conclusions about them and how guitars were even invented.
Then, after that, I felt I could learn to play the thing.

Most people, just learning the chords is enough and they're off playing songs by the end of the month. I overcomplicate things.