>>82878998
Fair. I feel like a bulk of the issues with porn could have been solved early on with better regulation on what could be depicted. (Yeah yeah my free speech and all of that. I know I'm walking a tightrope here with this take)
In either case, I think there needs to be serious consideration on this. Look at the new AI-gen porn ads. They're showing stuff that is physically impossible but doesn't have that barrier of "Oh, this is CG" or "Oh, this is drawn/animated" where you have an obvious sign it's not real.
No, if you're unlucky you look at it and it looks real until they do some dumb surrealist shit like manifesting head-sized colored balls one after another from their cooch.
I'm not even joking, that's a real ad.
Now consider how many men think bigger is always better in terms of dick size, not considering that you can actually be too big and hospitalize a woman if you have a mega dong and aren't carful.
At the very least there needs to be a mandatory labeling or categorization for porn that ignores realism in favor of catering to extreme / unrealistic / impossible kinks.
