>>82880211
nigga can you retype that so you get some of the words right, it's gibberish
>no, i said that women CHOOSE to stay with someone who abuses them, not that they CHOOSE to make him abuse her, there is a difference between putting up with abuse versus "choosing" to be raped
yes, they choose to be abused. choosing to stay with an abuser is effectively choosing to be abused and is consenting to be abused. just like how staying with a rapist means you choose to be raped and consent to being raped.
>i said that women CHOOSE to stay with someone who abuses them,
obviously staying with an abuser means you will be abused. you are choosing to be abused if you stay with an abuser. that's just logical.
>not that they CHOOSE to make him abuse her,
so your worldview is entirely based on the possibility than a known abuser will stop abusing a woman at complete random? given the same conditions, the abuser will continue to abuse
>there is a difference between putting up with abuse versus "choosing" to be raped
yes, the former is choosing to be abused when simply leaving the abuser will 100% end the abuse. if some of the abuse is rape and you stay with your rapist, then yes you are choosing to be raped or are expecting an abuser to completely change his behavior at random. this is exactly why anti-rape and domestic violence laws are a problem, because they only exist to enable these abusive relationships. if foids actually cared about 100% stopping abuse they would just not hook up with abusers.